Cargando…
A study of prisms and therapy in attention loss after stroke (SPATIAL): A feasibility randomised controlled trial
OBJECTIVE: Investigate feasibility and acceptability of prism adaptation training for people with inattention (spatial neglect), early after stroke, during usual care. DESIGN: Phase II feasibility randomised controlled trial with 3:1 stratified allocation to standard occupational therapy with or wit...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
SAGE Publications
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9912302/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36285484 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/02692155221134060 |
_version_ | 1784885178432225280 |
---|---|
author | Longley, Verity Woodward-Nutt, Kate Turton, Ailie J. Stocking, Katie Checketts, Matthew Bamford, Ann Douglass, Emma Taylor, Julie Woodley, Julie Moule, Pam Vail, Andy Bowen, Audrey |
author_facet | Longley, Verity Woodward-Nutt, Kate Turton, Ailie J. Stocking, Katie Checketts, Matthew Bamford, Ann Douglass, Emma Taylor, Julie Woodley, Julie Moule, Pam Vail, Andy Bowen, Audrey |
author_sort | Longley, Verity |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: Investigate feasibility and acceptability of prism adaptation training for people with inattention (spatial neglect), early after stroke, during usual care. DESIGN: Phase II feasibility randomised controlled trial with 3:1 stratified allocation to standard occupational therapy with or without intervention, and nested process evaluation. SETTING: Ten hospital sites providing in-patient stroke services. PARTICIPANTS: Screened positive for inattention more than one-week post-stroke; informal carers. Occupational therapists participated in qualitative interviews. INTERVENTION: Adjunctive prism adaptation training at the start of standard occupational therapy sessions for three weeks. MAIN MEASURES: Feasibility measures included recruitment and retention rates, intervention fidelity and attrition. Outcomes collected at baseline, 3 weeks and 12 weeks tested measures including Nottingham Extended Activities of Daily Living Scale. Acceptability was explored through qualitative interviews and structured questions. RESULTS: Eighty (31%) patients were eligible, 57 (71%) consented, 54 randomised (40:13, +1 exclusion) and 39 (74%) completed 12-week outcomes. Treatment fidelity was good: participants received median eight intervention sessions (IQR: 5, 12) lasting 4.7 min (IQR: 4.1, 5.0). All six serious adverse events were unrelated. There was no signal that patients allocated to intervention did better than controls. Twenty five of 35 recruited carers provided outcomes with excellent data completeness. Therapists, patients and carers found prism adaptation training acceptable. CONCLUSIONS: It is feasible and acceptable to conduct a high-quality definitive trial of prism adaptation training within occupational therapy early after stroke in usual care setting, but difficult to justify given no sign of benefit over standard occupational therapy. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: https://www.isrctn.com/ Ref ISRCTN88395268. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9912302 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | SAGE Publications |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-99123022023-02-11 A study of prisms and therapy in attention loss after stroke (SPATIAL): A feasibility randomised controlled trial Longley, Verity Woodward-Nutt, Kate Turton, Ailie J. Stocking, Katie Checketts, Matthew Bamford, Ann Douglass, Emma Taylor, Julie Woodley, Julie Moule, Pam Vail, Andy Bowen, Audrey Clin Rehabil Evaluative Studies OBJECTIVE: Investigate feasibility and acceptability of prism adaptation training for people with inattention (spatial neglect), early after stroke, during usual care. DESIGN: Phase II feasibility randomised controlled trial with 3:1 stratified allocation to standard occupational therapy with or without intervention, and nested process evaluation. SETTING: Ten hospital sites providing in-patient stroke services. PARTICIPANTS: Screened positive for inattention more than one-week post-stroke; informal carers. Occupational therapists participated in qualitative interviews. INTERVENTION: Adjunctive prism adaptation training at the start of standard occupational therapy sessions for three weeks. MAIN MEASURES: Feasibility measures included recruitment and retention rates, intervention fidelity and attrition. Outcomes collected at baseline, 3 weeks and 12 weeks tested measures including Nottingham Extended Activities of Daily Living Scale. Acceptability was explored through qualitative interviews and structured questions. RESULTS: Eighty (31%) patients were eligible, 57 (71%) consented, 54 randomised (40:13, +1 exclusion) and 39 (74%) completed 12-week outcomes. Treatment fidelity was good: participants received median eight intervention sessions (IQR: 5, 12) lasting 4.7 min (IQR: 4.1, 5.0). All six serious adverse events were unrelated. There was no signal that patients allocated to intervention did better than controls. Twenty five of 35 recruited carers provided outcomes with excellent data completeness. Therapists, patients and carers found prism adaptation training acceptable. CONCLUSIONS: It is feasible and acceptable to conduct a high-quality definitive trial of prism adaptation training within occupational therapy early after stroke in usual care setting, but difficult to justify given no sign of benefit over standard occupational therapy. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: https://www.isrctn.com/ Ref ISRCTN88395268. SAGE Publications 2022-10-26 2023-03 /pmc/articles/PMC9912302/ /pubmed/36285484 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/02692155221134060 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) which permits any use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access page (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage). |
spellingShingle | Evaluative Studies Longley, Verity Woodward-Nutt, Kate Turton, Ailie J. Stocking, Katie Checketts, Matthew Bamford, Ann Douglass, Emma Taylor, Julie Woodley, Julie Moule, Pam Vail, Andy Bowen, Audrey A study of prisms and therapy in attention loss after stroke (SPATIAL): A feasibility randomised controlled trial |
title | A study of prisms and therapy in attention loss after stroke
(SPATIAL): A feasibility randomised controlled trial |
title_full | A study of prisms and therapy in attention loss after stroke
(SPATIAL): A feasibility randomised controlled trial |
title_fullStr | A study of prisms and therapy in attention loss after stroke
(SPATIAL): A feasibility randomised controlled trial |
title_full_unstemmed | A study of prisms and therapy in attention loss after stroke
(SPATIAL): A feasibility randomised controlled trial |
title_short | A study of prisms and therapy in attention loss after stroke
(SPATIAL): A feasibility randomised controlled trial |
title_sort | study of prisms and therapy in attention loss after stroke
(spatial): a feasibility randomised controlled trial |
topic | Evaluative Studies |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9912302/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36285484 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/02692155221134060 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT longleyverity astudyofprismsandtherapyinattentionlossafterstrokespatialafeasibilityrandomisedcontrolledtrial AT woodwardnuttkate astudyofprismsandtherapyinattentionlossafterstrokespatialafeasibilityrandomisedcontrolledtrial AT turtonailiej astudyofprismsandtherapyinattentionlossafterstrokespatialafeasibilityrandomisedcontrolledtrial AT stockingkatie astudyofprismsandtherapyinattentionlossafterstrokespatialafeasibilityrandomisedcontrolledtrial AT checkettsmatthew astudyofprismsandtherapyinattentionlossafterstrokespatialafeasibilityrandomisedcontrolledtrial AT bamfordann astudyofprismsandtherapyinattentionlossafterstrokespatialafeasibilityrandomisedcontrolledtrial AT douglassemma astudyofprismsandtherapyinattentionlossafterstrokespatialafeasibilityrandomisedcontrolledtrial AT taylorjulie astudyofprismsandtherapyinattentionlossafterstrokespatialafeasibilityrandomisedcontrolledtrial AT woodleyjulie astudyofprismsandtherapyinattentionlossafterstrokespatialafeasibilityrandomisedcontrolledtrial AT moulepam astudyofprismsandtherapyinattentionlossafterstrokespatialafeasibilityrandomisedcontrolledtrial AT vailandy astudyofprismsandtherapyinattentionlossafterstrokespatialafeasibilityrandomisedcontrolledtrial AT bowenaudrey astudyofprismsandtherapyinattentionlossafterstrokespatialafeasibilityrandomisedcontrolledtrial AT longleyverity studyofprismsandtherapyinattentionlossafterstrokespatialafeasibilityrandomisedcontrolledtrial AT woodwardnuttkate studyofprismsandtherapyinattentionlossafterstrokespatialafeasibilityrandomisedcontrolledtrial AT turtonailiej studyofprismsandtherapyinattentionlossafterstrokespatialafeasibilityrandomisedcontrolledtrial AT stockingkatie studyofprismsandtherapyinattentionlossafterstrokespatialafeasibilityrandomisedcontrolledtrial AT checkettsmatthew studyofprismsandtherapyinattentionlossafterstrokespatialafeasibilityrandomisedcontrolledtrial AT bamfordann studyofprismsandtherapyinattentionlossafterstrokespatialafeasibilityrandomisedcontrolledtrial AT douglassemma studyofprismsandtherapyinattentionlossafterstrokespatialafeasibilityrandomisedcontrolledtrial AT taylorjulie studyofprismsandtherapyinattentionlossafterstrokespatialafeasibilityrandomisedcontrolledtrial AT woodleyjulie studyofprismsandtherapyinattentionlossafterstrokespatialafeasibilityrandomisedcontrolledtrial AT moulepam studyofprismsandtherapyinattentionlossafterstrokespatialafeasibilityrandomisedcontrolledtrial AT vailandy studyofprismsandtherapyinattentionlossafterstrokespatialafeasibilityrandomisedcontrolledtrial AT bowenaudrey studyofprismsandtherapyinattentionlossafterstrokespatialafeasibilityrandomisedcontrolledtrial |