Cargando…
A quantitative, multicentre, longitudinal study of patient experiences after gynaecological day surgery
AIM: The aim of this study was to explore patients' experiences after gynaecological day surgery one and 30 days postoperatively, as well as potential factors influencing these experiences. DESIGN: The study had a multicentre, quantitative, longitudinal design. METHODS: The study was conducted...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9912434/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36210540 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/nop2.1403 |
_version_ | 1784885205318762496 |
---|---|
author | Gran Bruun, Anne‐Marie Svensen, Katrine Johansen, Elin Halstensen, Thor‐David Gustavsson, Anette Leonardsen, Ann‐Chatrin Linqvist |
author_facet | Gran Bruun, Anne‐Marie Svensen, Katrine Johansen, Elin Halstensen, Thor‐David Gustavsson, Anette Leonardsen, Ann‐Chatrin Linqvist |
author_sort | Gran Bruun, Anne‐Marie |
collection | PubMed |
description | AIM: The aim of this study was to explore patients' experiences after gynaecological day surgery one and 30 days postoperatively, as well as potential factors influencing these experiences. DESIGN: The study had a multicentre, quantitative, longitudinal design. METHODS: The study was conducted in three different hospitals' day surgical unit and included patients undergoing gynaecological surgery in general anaesthesia. We used a questionnaire including the European Quality of Life tool (EQ5D3L), the Quality‐of‐Recovery‐15 questionnaire (QoR‐15) and items relating to patient experiences, the first day (T1, n = 444) and 30 days (T2, n = 193) after surgery. Data were collected in the period March 2019 to March 2020. RESULTS: Results show that patients mainly had positive experiences and ranged quality of recovery high, even though some areas needed improvement. Patient scores on the QoR‐15 relating to their experiences 24 h postoperative were rated higher at T1 than at T2. Twenty per cent of the respondents experienced complications such as infection, haemorrhage and pain. About 1/5 of these contacted healthcare services, and three per cent was hospitalized. EQ5D score was the only factor that made an statistically significant impact on patients' experiences with quality of recovery (R (2) .169, F = 82.87). However, this effect was weak. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9912434 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-99124342023-02-13 A quantitative, multicentre, longitudinal study of patient experiences after gynaecological day surgery Gran Bruun, Anne‐Marie Svensen, Katrine Johansen, Elin Halstensen, Thor‐David Gustavsson, Anette Leonardsen, Ann‐Chatrin Linqvist Nurs Open Research Articles AIM: The aim of this study was to explore patients' experiences after gynaecological day surgery one and 30 days postoperatively, as well as potential factors influencing these experiences. DESIGN: The study had a multicentre, quantitative, longitudinal design. METHODS: The study was conducted in three different hospitals' day surgical unit and included patients undergoing gynaecological surgery in general anaesthesia. We used a questionnaire including the European Quality of Life tool (EQ5D3L), the Quality‐of‐Recovery‐15 questionnaire (QoR‐15) and items relating to patient experiences, the first day (T1, n = 444) and 30 days (T2, n = 193) after surgery. Data were collected in the period March 2019 to March 2020. RESULTS: Results show that patients mainly had positive experiences and ranged quality of recovery high, even though some areas needed improvement. Patient scores on the QoR‐15 relating to their experiences 24 h postoperative were rated higher at T1 than at T2. Twenty per cent of the respondents experienced complications such as infection, haemorrhage and pain. About 1/5 of these contacted healthcare services, and three per cent was hospitalized. EQ5D score was the only factor that made an statistically significant impact on patients' experiences with quality of recovery (R (2) .169, F = 82.87). However, this effect was weak. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-10-09 /pmc/articles/PMC9912434/ /pubmed/36210540 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/nop2.1403 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Nursing Open published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Articles Gran Bruun, Anne‐Marie Svensen, Katrine Johansen, Elin Halstensen, Thor‐David Gustavsson, Anette Leonardsen, Ann‐Chatrin Linqvist A quantitative, multicentre, longitudinal study of patient experiences after gynaecological day surgery |
title | A quantitative, multicentre, longitudinal study of patient experiences after gynaecological day surgery |
title_full | A quantitative, multicentre, longitudinal study of patient experiences after gynaecological day surgery |
title_fullStr | A quantitative, multicentre, longitudinal study of patient experiences after gynaecological day surgery |
title_full_unstemmed | A quantitative, multicentre, longitudinal study of patient experiences after gynaecological day surgery |
title_short | A quantitative, multicentre, longitudinal study of patient experiences after gynaecological day surgery |
title_sort | quantitative, multicentre, longitudinal study of patient experiences after gynaecological day surgery |
topic | Research Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9912434/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36210540 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/nop2.1403 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT granbruunannemarie aquantitativemulticentrelongitudinalstudyofpatientexperiencesaftergynaecologicaldaysurgery AT svensenkatrine aquantitativemulticentrelongitudinalstudyofpatientexperiencesaftergynaecologicaldaysurgery AT johansenelin aquantitativemulticentrelongitudinalstudyofpatientexperiencesaftergynaecologicaldaysurgery AT halstensenthordavid aquantitativemulticentrelongitudinalstudyofpatientexperiencesaftergynaecologicaldaysurgery AT gustavssonanette aquantitativemulticentrelongitudinalstudyofpatientexperiencesaftergynaecologicaldaysurgery AT leonardsenannchatrinlinqvist aquantitativemulticentrelongitudinalstudyofpatientexperiencesaftergynaecologicaldaysurgery AT granbruunannemarie quantitativemulticentrelongitudinalstudyofpatientexperiencesaftergynaecologicaldaysurgery AT svensenkatrine quantitativemulticentrelongitudinalstudyofpatientexperiencesaftergynaecologicaldaysurgery AT johansenelin quantitativemulticentrelongitudinalstudyofpatientexperiencesaftergynaecologicaldaysurgery AT halstensenthordavid quantitativemulticentrelongitudinalstudyofpatientexperiencesaftergynaecologicaldaysurgery AT gustavssonanette quantitativemulticentrelongitudinalstudyofpatientexperiencesaftergynaecologicaldaysurgery AT leonardsenannchatrinlinqvist quantitativemulticentrelongitudinalstudyofpatientexperiencesaftergynaecologicaldaysurgery |