Cargando…

A quantitative, multicentre, longitudinal study of patient experiences after gynaecological day surgery

AIM: The aim of this study was to explore patients' experiences after gynaecological day surgery one and 30 days postoperatively, as well as potential factors influencing these experiences. DESIGN: The study had a multicentre, quantitative, longitudinal design. METHODS: The study was conducted...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gran Bruun, Anne‐Marie, Svensen, Katrine, Johansen, Elin, Halstensen, Thor‐David, Gustavsson, Anette, Leonardsen, Ann‐Chatrin Linqvist
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9912434/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36210540
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/nop2.1403
_version_ 1784885205318762496
author Gran Bruun, Anne‐Marie
Svensen, Katrine
Johansen, Elin
Halstensen, Thor‐David
Gustavsson, Anette
Leonardsen, Ann‐Chatrin Linqvist
author_facet Gran Bruun, Anne‐Marie
Svensen, Katrine
Johansen, Elin
Halstensen, Thor‐David
Gustavsson, Anette
Leonardsen, Ann‐Chatrin Linqvist
author_sort Gran Bruun, Anne‐Marie
collection PubMed
description AIM: The aim of this study was to explore patients' experiences after gynaecological day surgery one and 30 days postoperatively, as well as potential factors influencing these experiences. DESIGN: The study had a multicentre, quantitative, longitudinal design. METHODS: The study was conducted in three different hospitals' day surgical unit and included patients undergoing gynaecological surgery in general anaesthesia. We used a questionnaire including the European Quality of Life tool (EQ5D3L), the Quality‐of‐Recovery‐15 questionnaire (QoR‐15) and items relating to patient experiences, the first day (T1, n = 444) and 30 days (T2, n = 193) after surgery. Data were collected in the period March 2019 to March 2020. RESULTS: Results show that patients mainly had positive experiences and ranged quality of recovery high, even though some areas needed improvement. Patient scores on the QoR‐15 relating to their experiences 24 h postoperative were rated higher at T1 than at T2. Twenty per cent of the respondents experienced complications such as infection, haemorrhage and pain. About 1/5 of these contacted healthcare services, and three per cent was hospitalized. EQ5D score was the only factor that made an statistically significant impact on patients' experiences with quality of recovery (R (2) .169, F = 82.87). However, this effect was weak.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9912434
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-99124342023-02-13 A quantitative, multicentre, longitudinal study of patient experiences after gynaecological day surgery Gran Bruun, Anne‐Marie Svensen, Katrine Johansen, Elin Halstensen, Thor‐David Gustavsson, Anette Leonardsen, Ann‐Chatrin Linqvist Nurs Open Research Articles AIM: The aim of this study was to explore patients' experiences after gynaecological day surgery one and 30 days postoperatively, as well as potential factors influencing these experiences. DESIGN: The study had a multicentre, quantitative, longitudinal design. METHODS: The study was conducted in three different hospitals' day surgical unit and included patients undergoing gynaecological surgery in general anaesthesia. We used a questionnaire including the European Quality of Life tool (EQ5D3L), the Quality‐of‐Recovery‐15 questionnaire (QoR‐15) and items relating to patient experiences, the first day (T1, n = 444) and 30 days (T2, n = 193) after surgery. Data were collected in the period March 2019 to March 2020. RESULTS: Results show that patients mainly had positive experiences and ranged quality of recovery high, even though some areas needed improvement. Patient scores on the QoR‐15 relating to their experiences 24 h postoperative were rated higher at T1 than at T2. Twenty per cent of the respondents experienced complications such as infection, haemorrhage and pain. About 1/5 of these contacted healthcare services, and three per cent was hospitalized. EQ5D score was the only factor that made an statistically significant impact on patients' experiences with quality of recovery (R (2) .169, F = 82.87). However, this effect was weak. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-10-09 /pmc/articles/PMC9912434/ /pubmed/36210540 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/nop2.1403 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Nursing Open published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Articles
Gran Bruun, Anne‐Marie
Svensen, Katrine
Johansen, Elin
Halstensen, Thor‐David
Gustavsson, Anette
Leonardsen, Ann‐Chatrin Linqvist
A quantitative, multicentre, longitudinal study of patient experiences after gynaecological day surgery
title A quantitative, multicentre, longitudinal study of patient experiences after gynaecological day surgery
title_full A quantitative, multicentre, longitudinal study of patient experiences after gynaecological day surgery
title_fullStr A quantitative, multicentre, longitudinal study of patient experiences after gynaecological day surgery
title_full_unstemmed A quantitative, multicentre, longitudinal study of patient experiences after gynaecological day surgery
title_short A quantitative, multicentre, longitudinal study of patient experiences after gynaecological day surgery
title_sort quantitative, multicentre, longitudinal study of patient experiences after gynaecological day surgery
topic Research Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9912434/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36210540
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/nop2.1403
work_keys_str_mv AT granbruunannemarie aquantitativemulticentrelongitudinalstudyofpatientexperiencesaftergynaecologicaldaysurgery
AT svensenkatrine aquantitativemulticentrelongitudinalstudyofpatientexperiencesaftergynaecologicaldaysurgery
AT johansenelin aquantitativemulticentrelongitudinalstudyofpatientexperiencesaftergynaecologicaldaysurgery
AT halstensenthordavid aquantitativemulticentrelongitudinalstudyofpatientexperiencesaftergynaecologicaldaysurgery
AT gustavssonanette aquantitativemulticentrelongitudinalstudyofpatientexperiencesaftergynaecologicaldaysurgery
AT leonardsenannchatrinlinqvist aquantitativemulticentrelongitudinalstudyofpatientexperiencesaftergynaecologicaldaysurgery
AT granbruunannemarie quantitativemulticentrelongitudinalstudyofpatientexperiencesaftergynaecologicaldaysurgery
AT svensenkatrine quantitativemulticentrelongitudinalstudyofpatientexperiencesaftergynaecologicaldaysurgery
AT johansenelin quantitativemulticentrelongitudinalstudyofpatientexperiencesaftergynaecologicaldaysurgery
AT halstensenthordavid quantitativemulticentrelongitudinalstudyofpatientexperiencesaftergynaecologicaldaysurgery
AT gustavssonanette quantitativemulticentrelongitudinalstudyofpatientexperiencesaftergynaecologicaldaysurgery
AT leonardsenannchatrinlinqvist quantitativemulticentrelongitudinalstudyofpatientexperiencesaftergynaecologicaldaysurgery