Synovial sarcoma of the tibial nerve - case report of a rare tumor in a rare location requiring early diagnosis

BACKGROUND: We present the case of a patient with a rare synovial sarcoma (SS) of the tibial nerve. So far, only 4 cases of patients with SS originating from the tibial nerve have been described in the literature, and our patient is only the second patient whose limb was saved during treatment. Synovial sarcomas are malignant mesenchymal tumors, i.e., tumors arising from connective tissue. Synovial sarcomas account for 5–10% of all soft tissue sarcomas. However, the name synovial sarcoma is misleading, because the tumor does not originate from synovial cells, but rather from primitive mesenchymal cells. The name most likely originated from the localization around the large joints on the limbs, more often on the lower ones, in the area of the knee joints. We point out the aspects of correct and quick diagnosis and subsequent treatment, which has very important effect on the patient’s prognosis. Primary less radical excision without prior biopsy verification leads to a higher risk of local recurrence, even if a proper reexcision was performed immediately after biopsy verification of the sarcoma. CASE PRESENTATION: A woman born in 1949 began to suffer at the end of 2020 with escalating pain under the left inner ankle with a projection to the sole and fingers. Her personal, family work and social history were insignificant. After the initial neurological examination, the patient was sent for an ultrasound examination of the ankle, which showed a lobular mass measuring 50 × 22 × 16 mm and according magnetic resonance imaging, the finding appeared to be a suspicious neurinoma of the tibial nerve. The tumor was surgically excised, without prior biopsy verification: a 50 × 20 mm tumor was dissected in the distal part of the tarsal canal, which grew through the structure of the tibial nerve and in some places into the surrounding area and appeared intraoperatively as a neurofibroma. But histologically the tumor was classified as monophasic synovial sarcoma. The patient was indicated for a wide reexcision of the skin with the subcutaneous tissue of size 91 × 20 × 15 mm. Now the patient is being treated with external radiotherapy to the tumor bed and she is able to walk. CONCLUSION: This report draws attention to a rare type of malignant nerve tumor, which both clinically and radiologically can mimic benign peripheral nerve sheath tumors. Synovial sarcoma should be considered in very painful resistances, typically located around the joints of the lower limbs, the growth of which can be slow. Because the size of the tumor is a negative prognostic factor, it is necessary to make a timely diagnosis using MR imaging and a biopsy with histological examination and to start treatment quickly. Surgical treatment should take place only after a biopsy with histological examination of the tumor so that it is sufficiently radical and does not have to undergo an additional reoperation, as happened in the case of our patient.