Cargando…
‘Guidance should have been there 15 years ago’ research stakeholders’ perspectives on ancillary care in the global south: a case study of Malawi
BACKGROUND: Medical researchers in resource-constrained settings must make difficult moral decisions about the provision of ancillary care to participants where additional healthcare needs fall outside the scope of the research and are not provided for by the local healthcare system. We examined res...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9912595/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36765406 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12910-023-00889-x |
_version_ | 1784885239229710336 |
---|---|
author | Kapumba, Blessings M. Nyirenda, Deborah Desmond, Nicola Seeley, Janet |
author_facet | Kapumba, Blessings M. Nyirenda, Deborah Desmond, Nicola Seeley, Janet |
author_sort | Kapumba, Blessings M. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Medical researchers in resource-constrained settings must make difficult moral decisions about the provision of ancillary care to participants where additional healthcare needs fall outside the scope of the research and are not provided for by the local healthcare system. We examined research stakeholder perceptions and experiences of ancillary care in biomedical research projects in Malawi. METHODS: We conducted 45 qualitative in-depth interviews with key research stakeholders: researchers, health officials, research ethics committee members, research participants and grants officers from international research funding organisations. Thematic analysis was used to analyse and interpret the findings. FINDINGS: All stakeholders perceived the provision of ancillary care to have potential health benefits to study participants in biomedical research. However, they also had concerns, particularly related to the absence of guidance to support it. Some suggested that consideration for ancillary care provision could be possible on a case-by-case basis but that most of the support from research projects should be directed towards strengthening the public health system, emphasising public good above individual or personal benefits. Some researchers and ethics committee members raised concerns about potential tensions in terms of funding, for example balancing study demands with addressing participants’ additional health needs. CONCLUSION: Our findings highlight the complexities and gaps in the guidance around the provision of ancillary care in Malawi and other resource-constrained settings more generally. To promote the provision of ancillary care, we recommend that national and international guidelines for research ethics include specific recommendations for resource-constrained settings and specific types of research. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12910-023-00889-x. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9912595 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-99125952023-02-11 ‘Guidance should have been there 15 years ago’ research stakeholders’ perspectives on ancillary care in the global south: a case study of Malawi Kapumba, Blessings M. Nyirenda, Deborah Desmond, Nicola Seeley, Janet BMC Med Ethics Research BACKGROUND: Medical researchers in resource-constrained settings must make difficult moral decisions about the provision of ancillary care to participants where additional healthcare needs fall outside the scope of the research and are not provided for by the local healthcare system. We examined research stakeholder perceptions and experiences of ancillary care in biomedical research projects in Malawi. METHODS: We conducted 45 qualitative in-depth interviews with key research stakeholders: researchers, health officials, research ethics committee members, research participants and grants officers from international research funding organisations. Thematic analysis was used to analyse and interpret the findings. FINDINGS: All stakeholders perceived the provision of ancillary care to have potential health benefits to study participants in biomedical research. However, they also had concerns, particularly related to the absence of guidance to support it. Some suggested that consideration for ancillary care provision could be possible on a case-by-case basis but that most of the support from research projects should be directed towards strengthening the public health system, emphasising public good above individual or personal benefits. Some researchers and ethics committee members raised concerns about potential tensions in terms of funding, for example balancing study demands with addressing participants’ additional health needs. CONCLUSION: Our findings highlight the complexities and gaps in the guidance around the provision of ancillary care in Malawi and other resource-constrained settings more generally. To promote the provision of ancillary care, we recommend that national and international guidelines for research ethics include specific recommendations for resource-constrained settings and specific types of research. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12910-023-00889-x. BioMed Central 2023-02-10 /pmc/articles/PMC9912595/ /pubmed/36765406 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12910-023-00889-x Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Kapumba, Blessings M. Nyirenda, Deborah Desmond, Nicola Seeley, Janet ‘Guidance should have been there 15 years ago’ research stakeholders’ perspectives on ancillary care in the global south: a case study of Malawi |
title | ‘Guidance should have been there 15 years ago’ research stakeholders’ perspectives on ancillary care in the global south: a case study of Malawi |
title_full | ‘Guidance should have been there 15 years ago’ research stakeholders’ perspectives on ancillary care in the global south: a case study of Malawi |
title_fullStr | ‘Guidance should have been there 15 years ago’ research stakeholders’ perspectives on ancillary care in the global south: a case study of Malawi |
title_full_unstemmed | ‘Guidance should have been there 15 years ago’ research stakeholders’ perspectives on ancillary care in the global south: a case study of Malawi |
title_short | ‘Guidance should have been there 15 years ago’ research stakeholders’ perspectives on ancillary care in the global south: a case study of Malawi |
title_sort | ‘guidance should have been there 15 years ago’ research stakeholders’ perspectives on ancillary care in the global south: a case study of malawi |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9912595/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36765406 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12910-023-00889-x |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kapumbablessingsm guidanceshouldhavebeenthere15yearsagoresearchstakeholdersperspectivesonancillarycareintheglobalsouthacasestudyofmalawi AT nyirendadeborah guidanceshouldhavebeenthere15yearsagoresearchstakeholdersperspectivesonancillarycareintheglobalsouthacasestudyofmalawi AT desmondnicola guidanceshouldhavebeenthere15yearsagoresearchstakeholdersperspectivesonancillarycareintheglobalsouthacasestudyofmalawi AT seeleyjanet guidanceshouldhavebeenthere15yearsagoresearchstakeholdersperspectivesonancillarycareintheglobalsouthacasestudyofmalawi |