Cargando…

Relationship between occupational and leisure-time physical activity and the need for recovery after work

BACKGROUND: Health benefits of physical activity are very well acknowledged but the role of both occupational physical activity (OPA) and leisure time physical activity (LTPA) in recovery after work is not thoroughly understood. The purpose of this study was to investigate the association between ac...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Karihtala, Tiina, Valtonen, Anu M., Kautiainen, Hannu, Hopsu, Leila, Halonen, Janne, Heinonen, Ari, Puttonen, Sampsa
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9912667/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36759865
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13690-022-01017-8
_version_ 1784885254410993664
author Karihtala, Tiina
Valtonen, Anu M.
Kautiainen, Hannu
Hopsu, Leila
Halonen, Janne
Heinonen, Ari
Puttonen, Sampsa
author_facet Karihtala, Tiina
Valtonen, Anu M.
Kautiainen, Hannu
Hopsu, Leila
Halonen, Janne
Heinonen, Ari
Puttonen, Sampsa
author_sort Karihtala, Tiina
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Health benefits of physical activity are very well acknowledged but the role of both occupational physical activity (OPA) and leisure time physical activity (LTPA) in recovery after work is not thoroughly understood. The purpose of this study was to investigate the association between accelerometer-measured OPA and LTPA and the need for recovery after work (NFR) in early childhood education and care (ECEC) professionals. METHODS: The study participants were 217 female ECEC professionals aged 17–64. Physical activity was recorded with a three-axis accelerometer (ActiGraph GT9X Link, ActiGraph, USA) for seven consecutive days. Separate analyses were conducted for both OPA and LTPA and reported as hours/day based on different intensity levels (light, moderate, vigorous, very vigorous). The NFR was measured with the Need For Recovery (NFR) scale (0%–100%). RESULTS: Participants’ average physical activity for both OPA and LTPA was about 4 h/day, and the mean NFR score was 38.4%. OPA was significantly associated with the NFR but not with LTPA. The relationship remained significant after adjustments for age, body mass index, work ability, mental health status, and sleep difficulties (p < 0.024). CONCLUSION: According to this study, the OPA level is related to the level of the NFR in female ECEC professionals. Based on the results, it seems that LTPA has no relevance to the NFR. Results suggest that long-lasting OPA, even without strenuous physical activity at work, may predispose individuals to a high NFR.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9912667
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-99126672023-02-11 Relationship between occupational and leisure-time physical activity and the need for recovery after work Karihtala, Tiina Valtonen, Anu M. Kautiainen, Hannu Hopsu, Leila Halonen, Janne Heinonen, Ari Puttonen, Sampsa Arch Public Health Research BACKGROUND: Health benefits of physical activity are very well acknowledged but the role of both occupational physical activity (OPA) and leisure time physical activity (LTPA) in recovery after work is not thoroughly understood. The purpose of this study was to investigate the association between accelerometer-measured OPA and LTPA and the need for recovery after work (NFR) in early childhood education and care (ECEC) professionals. METHODS: The study participants were 217 female ECEC professionals aged 17–64. Physical activity was recorded with a three-axis accelerometer (ActiGraph GT9X Link, ActiGraph, USA) for seven consecutive days. Separate analyses were conducted for both OPA and LTPA and reported as hours/day based on different intensity levels (light, moderate, vigorous, very vigorous). The NFR was measured with the Need For Recovery (NFR) scale (0%–100%). RESULTS: Participants’ average physical activity for both OPA and LTPA was about 4 h/day, and the mean NFR score was 38.4%. OPA was significantly associated with the NFR but not with LTPA. The relationship remained significant after adjustments for age, body mass index, work ability, mental health status, and sleep difficulties (p < 0.024). CONCLUSION: According to this study, the OPA level is related to the level of the NFR in female ECEC professionals. Based on the results, it seems that LTPA has no relevance to the NFR. Results suggest that long-lasting OPA, even without strenuous physical activity at work, may predispose individuals to a high NFR. BioMed Central 2023-02-10 /pmc/articles/PMC9912667/ /pubmed/36759865 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13690-022-01017-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Karihtala, Tiina
Valtonen, Anu M.
Kautiainen, Hannu
Hopsu, Leila
Halonen, Janne
Heinonen, Ari
Puttonen, Sampsa
Relationship between occupational and leisure-time physical activity and the need for recovery after work
title Relationship between occupational and leisure-time physical activity and the need for recovery after work
title_full Relationship between occupational and leisure-time physical activity and the need for recovery after work
title_fullStr Relationship between occupational and leisure-time physical activity and the need for recovery after work
title_full_unstemmed Relationship between occupational and leisure-time physical activity and the need for recovery after work
title_short Relationship between occupational and leisure-time physical activity and the need for recovery after work
title_sort relationship between occupational and leisure-time physical activity and the need for recovery after work
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9912667/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36759865
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13690-022-01017-8
work_keys_str_mv AT karihtalatiina relationshipbetweenoccupationalandleisuretimephysicalactivityandtheneedforrecoveryafterwork
AT valtonenanum relationshipbetweenoccupationalandleisuretimephysicalactivityandtheneedforrecoveryafterwork
AT kautiainenhannu relationshipbetweenoccupationalandleisuretimephysicalactivityandtheneedforrecoveryafterwork
AT hopsuleila relationshipbetweenoccupationalandleisuretimephysicalactivityandtheneedforrecoveryafterwork
AT halonenjanne relationshipbetweenoccupationalandleisuretimephysicalactivityandtheneedforrecoveryafterwork
AT heinonenari relationshipbetweenoccupationalandleisuretimephysicalactivityandtheneedforrecoveryafterwork
AT puttonensampsa relationshipbetweenoccupationalandleisuretimephysicalactivityandtheneedforrecoveryafterwork