Cargando…

Intraoperative hypovolemia as a possible precipitating factor for pituitary apoplexy: a case report

BACKGROUND: Pituitary apoplexy is acute infarction with or without hemorrhage of the pituitary gland. It is a rare but potentially life-threatening emergency that most commonly occurs in the setting of pituitary adenoma. The mechanisms underlying pituitary apoplexy are not well understood, but are p...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Abo, Kristine M., Kane, Joseph, Druckenbrod, Rachel C., Mooney, Michael A., Rachlin, Jacob
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9912690/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36759850
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13256-022-03738-4
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: Pituitary apoplexy is acute infarction with or without hemorrhage of the pituitary gland. It is a rare but potentially life-threatening emergency that most commonly occurs in the setting of pituitary adenoma. The mechanisms underlying pituitary apoplexy are not well understood, but are proposed to include factors of both hemodynamic supply and adenoma demand. In the case of patients with known pituitary macroadenomas undergoing major surgery for other indications, there is a theoretically increased risk of apoplexy in the setting of “surgical stress.” However, risk stratification of patients with nonfunctioning pituitary adenomas prior to major surgery is challenging because the precipitating factors for pituitary apoplexy are not completely understood. Here we present a case in which intraoperative hypovolemia is a possible mechanistic precipitating factor for pituitary apoplexy. CASE PRESENTATION: A 76-year-old patient with a known hypofunctioning pituitary macroadenoma underwent nephrectomy for renal cell carcinoma, during which there was significant intraoperative blood loss. He became symptomatic with ophthalmoplegia on the second postoperative day, and was diagnosed with pituitary apoplexy. He was managed conservatively with cortisol replacement therapy, and underwent therapeutic anticoagulation 2 months after pituitary apoplexy for deep vein thrombosis. His ophthalmoplegia slowly resolved over months of follow-up. Pituitary apoplexy did not recur with therapeutic anticoagulation. CONCLUSIONS: When considering the risk of surgery in patients with a known pituitary macroadenoma, an operation with possible high-volume intraoperative blood loss may have increased risk of pituitary apoplexy because intraoperative hypovolemia may precipitate ischemia, infarction, and subsequent hemorrhage. This may be particularly relevant in the cases of elective surgery. Additionally, we found that we were able to therapeutically anticoagulate a patient 2 months after pituitary apoplexy for the management of deep vein thrombosis without recurrence of pituitary apoplexy.