Cargando…

Comparison of intranasal and nebulized dexmedetomidine for premedication in pediatric patients: A non-inferiority randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Dexmedetomidine is a highly selective α-2 adrenoreceptor agonist and has been found to be an effective premedication agent when administered via the intranasal route. We aimed to compare the efficacy of dexmedetomidine premedication administered via intranasal route and through...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Verma, Shilpi, Bhatia, Pradeep Kumar, Sharma, Vandana, Mohammed, Sadik, Saran, Anita
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9912882/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36778820
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/joacp.JOACP_6_21
_version_ 1784885300777975808
author Verma, Shilpi
Bhatia, Pradeep Kumar
Sharma, Vandana
Mohammed, Sadik
Saran, Anita
author_facet Verma, Shilpi
Bhatia, Pradeep Kumar
Sharma, Vandana
Mohammed, Sadik
Saran, Anita
author_sort Verma, Shilpi
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Dexmedetomidine is a highly selective α-2 adrenoreceptor agonist and has been found to be an effective premedication agent when administered via the intranasal route. We aimed to compare the efficacy of dexmedetomidine premedication administered via intranasal route and through nebulization in pediatric patients. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This non-inferiority randomized controlled trial was conducted after getting approval from institutes ethics committee and informed written parental consent. Sixty-four children aged 2-8 years scheduled for elective surgery under general anesthesia were enrolled and were divided into two groups. Group I (Intranasal, n = 33) received 2 mcg/kg dexmedetomidine via intranasal route and group N (Nebulized, n = 31) received 2 mcg/kg dexmedetomidine through nebulization. The primary outcome was number of patients with satisfactory sedation 30 minutes after premedication at separation from parent. The secondary outcome included ease of medication acceptance, anxiety at parental separation, acceptance of anesthesia mask, perioperative hemodynamics, emergence agitation during recovery and adverse effects. Data collected was analyzed using Chi-square test, Student “t” test and Mann-Whitney U test with the help of SPSS 22. A one tailed P value < 0.025 was considered significant. RESULTS: Demographic profile was comparable between groups. On arrival in OR 27 (81.8%) patients in group I and 21 (67.7%) patients in group N had satisfactory sedation score (P = 0.19). The median (IQR) sedation score was comparable between group I and group N (P = 0.057). Patients in Group I showed significantly better medication and mask acceptance scores (P < 0.0001, P = 0.001 respectively), parental separation anxiety score (P < 0.0001) and emergence agitation score (P = 0.001). There were no significant differences in hemodynamic parameters and adverse effects between the groups. CONCLUSION: Although nebulized dexmedetomidine is non-inferior to intranasal dexmedetomidine in providing desired level of sedation but intranasal administration had better acceptance of medication and anesthesia mask with lesser anxiety at parental separation and postoperative emergence agitation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9912882
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-99128822023-02-11 Comparison of intranasal and nebulized dexmedetomidine for premedication in pediatric patients: A non-inferiority randomized controlled trial Verma, Shilpi Bhatia, Pradeep Kumar Sharma, Vandana Mohammed, Sadik Saran, Anita J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol Original Article BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Dexmedetomidine is a highly selective α-2 adrenoreceptor agonist and has been found to be an effective premedication agent when administered via the intranasal route. We aimed to compare the efficacy of dexmedetomidine premedication administered via intranasal route and through nebulization in pediatric patients. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This non-inferiority randomized controlled trial was conducted after getting approval from institutes ethics committee and informed written parental consent. Sixty-four children aged 2-8 years scheduled for elective surgery under general anesthesia were enrolled and were divided into two groups. Group I (Intranasal, n = 33) received 2 mcg/kg dexmedetomidine via intranasal route and group N (Nebulized, n = 31) received 2 mcg/kg dexmedetomidine through nebulization. The primary outcome was number of patients with satisfactory sedation 30 minutes after premedication at separation from parent. The secondary outcome included ease of medication acceptance, anxiety at parental separation, acceptance of anesthesia mask, perioperative hemodynamics, emergence agitation during recovery and adverse effects. Data collected was analyzed using Chi-square test, Student “t” test and Mann-Whitney U test with the help of SPSS 22. A one tailed P value < 0.025 was considered significant. RESULTS: Demographic profile was comparable between groups. On arrival in OR 27 (81.8%) patients in group I and 21 (67.7%) patients in group N had satisfactory sedation score (P = 0.19). The median (IQR) sedation score was comparable between group I and group N (P = 0.057). Patients in Group I showed significantly better medication and mask acceptance scores (P < 0.0001, P = 0.001 respectively), parental separation anxiety score (P < 0.0001) and emergence agitation score (P = 0.001). There were no significant differences in hemodynamic parameters and adverse effects between the groups. CONCLUSION: Although nebulized dexmedetomidine is non-inferior to intranasal dexmedetomidine in providing desired level of sedation but intranasal administration had better acceptance of medication and anesthesia mask with lesser anxiety at parental separation and postoperative emergence agitation. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2022 2022-03-08 /pmc/articles/PMC9912882/ /pubmed/36778820 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/joacp.JOACP_6_21 Text en Copyright: © 2022 Journal of Anaesthesiology Clinical Pharmacology https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Verma, Shilpi
Bhatia, Pradeep Kumar
Sharma, Vandana
Mohammed, Sadik
Saran, Anita
Comparison of intranasal and nebulized dexmedetomidine for premedication in pediatric patients: A non-inferiority randomized controlled trial
title Comparison of intranasal and nebulized dexmedetomidine for premedication in pediatric patients: A non-inferiority randomized controlled trial
title_full Comparison of intranasal and nebulized dexmedetomidine for premedication in pediatric patients: A non-inferiority randomized controlled trial
title_fullStr Comparison of intranasal and nebulized dexmedetomidine for premedication in pediatric patients: A non-inferiority randomized controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of intranasal and nebulized dexmedetomidine for premedication in pediatric patients: A non-inferiority randomized controlled trial
title_short Comparison of intranasal and nebulized dexmedetomidine for premedication in pediatric patients: A non-inferiority randomized controlled trial
title_sort comparison of intranasal and nebulized dexmedetomidine for premedication in pediatric patients: a non-inferiority randomized controlled trial
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9912882/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36778820
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/joacp.JOACP_6_21
work_keys_str_mv AT vermashilpi comparisonofintranasalandnebulizeddexmedetomidineforpremedicationinpediatricpatientsanoninferiorityrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT bhatiapradeepkumar comparisonofintranasalandnebulizeddexmedetomidineforpremedicationinpediatricpatientsanoninferiorityrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT sharmavandana comparisonofintranasalandnebulizeddexmedetomidineforpremedicationinpediatricpatientsanoninferiorityrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT mohammedsadik comparisonofintranasalandnebulizeddexmedetomidineforpremedicationinpediatricpatientsanoninferiorityrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT sarananita comparisonofintranasalandnebulizeddexmedetomidineforpremedicationinpediatricpatientsanoninferiorityrandomizedcontrolledtrial