Cargando…
Comparison of intranasal and nebulized dexmedetomidine for premedication in pediatric patients: A non-inferiority randomized controlled trial
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Dexmedetomidine is a highly selective α-2 adrenoreceptor agonist and has been found to be an effective premedication agent when administered via the intranasal route. We aimed to compare the efficacy of dexmedetomidine premedication administered via intranasal route and through...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9912882/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36778820 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/joacp.JOACP_6_21 |
_version_ | 1784885300777975808 |
---|---|
author | Verma, Shilpi Bhatia, Pradeep Kumar Sharma, Vandana Mohammed, Sadik Saran, Anita |
author_facet | Verma, Shilpi Bhatia, Pradeep Kumar Sharma, Vandana Mohammed, Sadik Saran, Anita |
author_sort | Verma, Shilpi |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Dexmedetomidine is a highly selective α-2 adrenoreceptor agonist and has been found to be an effective premedication agent when administered via the intranasal route. We aimed to compare the efficacy of dexmedetomidine premedication administered via intranasal route and through nebulization in pediatric patients. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This non-inferiority randomized controlled trial was conducted after getting approval from institutes ethics committee and informed written parental consent. Sixty-four children aged 2-8 years scheduled for elective surgery under general anesthesia were enrolled and were divided into two groups. Group I (Intranasal, n = 33) received 2 mcg/kg dexmedetomidine via intranasal route and group N (Nebulized, n = 31) received 2 mcg/kg dexmedetomidine through nebulization. The primary outcome was number of patients with satisfactory sedation 30 minutes after premedication at separation from parent. The secondary outcome included ease of medication acceptance, anxiety at parental separation, acceptance of anesthesia mask, perioperative hemodynamics, emergence agitation during recovery and adverse effects. Data collected was analyzed using Chi-square test, Student “t” test and Mann-Whitney U test with the help of SPSS 22. A one tailed P value < 0.025 was considered significant. RESULTS: Demographic profile was comparable between groups. On arrival in OR 27 (81.8%) patients in group I and 21 (67.7%) patients in group N had satisfactory sedation score (P = 0.19). The median (IQR) sedation score was comparable between group I and group N (P = 0.057). Patients in Group I showed significantly better medication and mask acceptance scores (P < 0.0001, P = 0.001 respectively), parental separation anxiety score (P < 0.0001) and emergence agitation score (P = 0.001). There were no significant differences in hemodynamic parameters and adverse effects between the groups. CONCLUSION: Although nebulized dexmedetomidine is non-inferior to intranasal dexmedetomidine in providing desired level of sedation but intranasal administration had better acceptance of medication and anesthesia mask with lesser anxiety at parental separation and postoperative emergence agitation. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9912882 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Wolters Kluwer - Medknow |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-99128822023-02-11 Comparison of intranasal and nebulized dexmedetomidine for premedication in pediatric patients: A non-inferiority randomized controlled trial Verma, Shilpi Bhatia, Pradeep Kumar Sharma, Vandana Mohammed, Sadik Saran, Anita J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol Original Article BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Dexmedetomidine is a highly selective α-2 adrenoreceptor agonist and has been found to be an effective premedication agent when administered via the intranasal route. We aimed to compare the efficacy of dexmedetomidine premedication administered via intranasal route and through nebulization in pediatric patients. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This non-inferiority randomized controlled trial was conducted after getting approval from institutes ethics committee and informed written parental consent. Sixty-four children aged 2-8 years scheduled for elective surgery under general anesthesia were enrolled and were divided into two groups. Group I (Intranasal, n = 33) received 2 mcg/kg dexmedetomidine via intranasal route and group N (Nebulized, n = 31) received 2 mcg/kg dexmedetomidine through nebulization. The primary outcome was number of patients with satisfactory sedation 30 minutes after premedication at separation from parent. The secondary outcome included ease of medication acceptance, anxiety at parental separation, acceptance of anesthesia mask, perioperative hemodynamics, emergence agitation during recovery and adverse effects. Data collected was analyzed using Chi-square test, Student “t” test and Mann-Whitney U test with the help of SPSS 22. A one tailed P value < 0.025 was considered significant. RESULTS: Demographic profile was comparable between groups. On arrival in OR 27 (81.8%) patients in group I and 21 (67.7%) patients in group N had satisfactory sedation score (P = 0.19). The median (IQR) sedation score was comparable between group I and group N (P = 0.057). Patients in Group I showed significantly better medication and mask acceptance scores (P < 0.0001, P = 0.001 respectively), parental separation anxiety score (P < 0.0001) and emergence agitation score (P = 0.001). There were no significant differences in hemodynamic parameters and adverse effects between the groups. CONCLUSION: Although nebulized dexmedetomidine is non-inferior to intranasal dexmedetomidine in providing desired level of sedation but intranasal administration had better acceptance of medication and anesthesia mask with lesser anxiety at parental separation and postoperative emergence agitation. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2022 2022-03-08 /pmc/articles/PMC9912882/ /pubmed/36778820 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/joacp.JOACP_6_21 Text en Copyright: © 2022 Journal of Anaesthesiology Clinical Pharmacology https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Verma, Shilpi Bhatia, Pradeep Kumar Sharma, Vandana Mohammed, Sadik Saran, Anita Comparison of intranasal and nebulized dexmedetomidine for premedication in pediatric patients: A non-inferiority randomized controlled trial |
title | Comparison of intranasal and nebulized dexmedetomidine for premedication in pediatric patients: A non-inferiority randomized controlled trial |
title_full | Comparison of intranasal and nebulized dexmedetomidine for premedication in pediatric patients: A non-inferiority randomized controlled trial |
title_fullStr | Comparison of intranasal and nebulized dexmedetomidine for premedication in pediatric patients: A non-inferiority randomized controlled trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of intranasal and nebulized dexmedetomidine for premedication in pediatric patients: A non-inferiority randomized controlled trial |
title_short | Comparison of intranasal and nebulized dexmedetomidine for premedication in pediatric patients: A non-inferiority randomized controlled trial |
title_sort | comparison of intranasal and nebulized dexmedetomidine for premedication in pediatric patients: a non-inferiority randomized controlled trial |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9912882/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36778820 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/joacp.JOACP_6_21 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT vermashilpi comparisonofintranasalandnebulizeddexmedetomidineforpremedicationinpediatricpatientsanoninferiorityrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT bhatiapradeepkumar comparisonofintranasalandnebulizeddexmedetomidineforpremedicationinpediatricpatientsanoninferiorityrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT sharmavandana comparisonofintranasalandnebulizeddexmedetomidineforpremedicationinpediatricpatientsanoninferiorityrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT mohammedsadik comparisonofintranasalandnebulizeddexmedetomidineforpremedicationinpediatricpatientsanoninferiorityrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT sarananita comparisonofintranasalandnebulizeddexmedetomidineforpremedicationinpediatricpatientsanoninferiorityrandomizedcontrolledtrial |