Cargando…

Incorporating end-users’ voices into the development of an implant for HIV prevention: a discrete choice experiment in South Africa and Zimbabwe

BACKGROUND: Input from end-users during preclinical phases can support market fit for new HIV prevention technologies. With several long-acting pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) implants in development, we aimed to understand young women’s preferences for PrEP implants to inform optimal design. METHOD...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Browne, Erica N., Manenzhe, Kgahlisho, Makoni, Wanzirai, Nkomo, Sikhanyisiwe, Mahaka, Imelda, Ahmed, Khatija, Shapley-Quinn, Mary Kate, Marton, Tozoe, Luecke, Ellen, Johnson, Leah, van der Straten, Ariane, Minnis, Alexandra M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9913002/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36765358
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12905-023-02181-x
_version_ 1784885322337746944
author Browne, Erica N.
Manenzhe, Kgahlisho
Makoni, Wanzirai
Nkomo, Sikhanyisiwe
Mahaka, Imelda
Ahmed, Khatija
Shapley-Quinn, Mary Kate
Marton, Tozoe
Luecke, Ellen
Johnson, Leah
van der Straten, Ariane
Minnis, Alexandra M.
author_facet Browne, Erica N.
Manenzhe, Kgahlisho
Makoni, Wanzirai
Nkomo, Sikhanyisiwe
Mahaka, Imelda
Ahmed, Khatija
Shapley-Quinn, Mary Kate
Marton, Tozoe
Luecke, Ellen
Johnson, Leah
van der Straten, Ariane
Minnis, Alexandra M.
author_sort Browne, Erica N.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Input from end-users during preclinical phases can support market fit for new HIV prevention technologies. With several long-acting pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) implants in development, we aimed to understand young women’s preferences for PrEP implants to inform optimal design. METHODS: We developed a discrete choice experiment and surveyed 800 young women in Harare, Zimbabwe and Tshwane, South Africa between September–November 2020. Women aged 18–30 years who were nulliparous, postpartum, or exchanged sex for money, goods or shelter in prior year were eligible; quotas were set for each subgroup. The DCE asked participants to choose between two hypothetical implants for HIV prevention in a series of nine questions. Implants were described by: size, number of rods and insertion sites, duration (6-months, 1-year, 2-years), flexibility, and biodegradability. Random-parameters logit models estimated preference weights. RESULTS: Median age was 24 years (interquartile range 21–27). By design, 36% had used contraceptive implants. Duration of protection was most important feature, with strong preference for a 2-year over 6-month implant. In Zimbabwe, the number of rods/insertion sites was second most important and half as important as duration. Nonetheless, to achieve an implant lasting 2-years, 74% were estimated to accept two rods, one in each arm. In South Africa, preference was for longer, flexible implants that required removal, although each of these attributes were one-third as important as duration. On average, biodegradability and size did not influence Zimbabwean women’s choices. Contraceptive implant experience and parity did not influence relative importance of attributes. CONCLUSIONS: While duration of protection was a prominent attribute shaping women’s choices for PrEP implants, other characteristics related to discreetness were relevant. Optimizing for longest dosing while also ensuring minimal detection of implant placement seemed most attractive to potential users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9913002
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-99130022023-02-12 Incorporating end-users’ voices into the development of an implant for HIV prevention: a discrete choice experiment in South Africa and Zimbabwe Browne, Erica N. Manenzhe, Kgahlisho Makoni, Wanzirai Nkomo, Sikhanyisiwe Mahaka, Imelda Ahmed, Khatija Shapley-Quinn, Mary Kate Marton, Tozoe Luecke, Ellen Johnson, Leah van der Straten, Ariane Minnis, Alexandra M. BMC Womens Health Research BACKGROUND: Input from end-users during preclinical phases can support market fit for new HIV prevention technologies. With several long-acting pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) implants in development, we aimed to understand young women’s preferences for PrEP implants to inform optimal design. METHODS: We developed a discrete choice experiment and surveyed 800 young women in Harare, Zimbabwe and Tshwane, South Africa between September–November 2020. Women aged 18–30 years who were nulliparous, postpartum, or exchanged sex for money, goods or shelter in prior year were eligible; quotas were set for each subgroup. The DCE asked participants to choose between two hypothetical implants for HIV prevention in a series of nine questions. Implants were described by: size, number of rods and insertion sites, duration (6-months, 1-year, 2-years), flexibility, and biodegradability. Random-parameters logit models estimated preference weights. RESULTS: Median age was 24 years (interquartile range 21–27). By design, 36% had used contraceptive implants. Duration of protection was most important feature, with strong preference for a 2-year over 6-month implant. In Zimbabwe, the number of rods/insertion sites was second most important and half as important as duration. Nonetheless, to achieve an implant lasting 2-years, 74% were estimated to accept two rods, one in each arm. In South Africa, preference was for longer, flexible implants that required removal, although each of these attributes were one-third as important as duration. On average, biodegradability and size did not influence Zimbabwean women’s choices. Contraceptive implant experience and parity did not influence relative importance of attributes. CONCLUSIONS: While duration of protection was a prominent attribute shaping women’s choices for PrEP implants, other characteristics related to discreetness were relevant. Optimizing for longest dosing while also ensuring minimal detection of implant placement seemed most attractive to potential users. BioMed Central 2023-02-10 /pmc/articles/PMC9913002/ /pubmed/36765358 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12905-023-02181-x Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Browne, Erica N.
Manenzhe, Kgahlisho
Makoni, Wanzirai
Nkomo, Sikhanyisiwe
Mahaka, Imelda
Ahmed, Khatija
Shapley-Quinn, Mary Kate
Marton, Tozoe
Luecke, Ellen
Johnson, Leah
van der Straten, Ariane
Minnis, Alexandra M.
Incorporating end-users’ voices into the development of an implant for HIV prevention: a discrete choice experiment in South Africa and Zimbabwe
title Incorporating end-users’ voices into the development of an implant for HIV prevention: a discrete choice experiment in South Africa and Zimbabwe
title_full Incorporating end-users’ voices into the development of an implant for HIV prevention: a discrete choice experiment in South Africa and Zimbabwe
title_fullStr Incorporating end-users’ voices into the development of an implant for HIV prevention: a discrete choice experiment in South Africa and Zimbabwe
title_full_unstemmed Incorporating end-users’ voices into the development of an implant for HIV prevention: a discrete choice experiment in South Africa and Zimbabwe
title_short Incorporating end-users’ voices into the development of an implant for HIV prevention: a discrete choice experiment in South Africa and Zimbabwe
title_sort incorporating end-users’ voices into the development of an implant for hiv prevention: a discrete choice experiment in south africa and zimbabwe
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9913002/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36765358
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12905-023-02181-x
work_keys_str_mv AT browneerican incorporatingendusersvoicesintothedevelopmentofanimplantforhivpreventionadiscretechoiceexperimentinsouthafricaandzimbabwe
AT manenzhekgahlisho incorporatingendusersvoicesintothedevelopmentofanimplantforhivpreventionadiscretechoiceexperimentinsouthafricaandzimbabwe
AT makoniwanzirai incorporatingendusersvoicesintothedevelopmentofanimplantforhivpreventionadiscretechoiceexperimentinsouthafricaandzimbabwe
AT nkomosikhanyisiwe incorporatingendusersvoicesintothedevelopmentofanimplantforhivpreventionadiscretechoiceexperimentinsouthafricaandzimbabwe
AT mahakaimelda incorporatingendusersvoicesintothedevelopmentofanimplantforhivpreventionadiscretechoiceexperimentinsouthafricaandzimbabwe
AT ahmedkhatija incorporatingendusersvoicesintothedevelopmentofanimplantforhivpreventionadiscretechoiceexperimentinsouthafricaandzimbabwe
AT shapleyquinnmarykate incorporatingendusersvoicesintothedevelopmentofanimplantforhivpreventionadiscretechoiceexperimentinsouthafricaandzimbabwe
AT martontozoe incorporatingendusersvoicesintothedevelopmentofanimplantforhivpreventionadiscretechoiceexperimentinsouthafricaandzimbabwe
AT lueckeellen incorporatingendusersvoicesintothedevelopmentofanimplantforhivpreventionadiscretechoiceexperimentinsouthafricaandzimbabwe
AT johnsonleah incorporatingendusersvoicesintothedevelopmentofanimplantforhivpreventionadiscretechoiceexperimentinsouthafricaandzimbabwe
AT vanderstratenariane incorporatingendusersvoicesintothedevelopmentofanimplantforhivpreventionadiscretechoiceexperimentinsouthafricaandzimbabwe
AT minnisalexandram incorporatingendusersvoicesintothedevelopmentofanimplantforhivpreventionadiscretechoiceexperimentinsouthafricaandzimbabwe