Cargando…
Prostate Cancer—PET Imaging Update
SIMPLE SUMMARY: The imaging of prostate cancer has evolved over the last few decades with molecular imaging, especially Positron Emission Tomography (PET) replacing conventional CT and MRI in patients with prostate cancer recurrence. These recent advances in PET imaging have allowed for a better loc...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9913636/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36765754 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers15030796 |
_version_ | 1784885474428452864 |
---|---|
author | Jetty, Sankarsh Loftus, James Ryan Patel, Abhinav Gupta, Akshya Puri, Savita Dogra, Vikram |
author_facet | Jetty, Sankarsh Loftus, James Ryan Patel, Abhinav Gupta, Akshya Puri, Savita Dogra, Vikram |
author_sort | Jetty, Sankarsh |
collection | PubMed |
description | SIMPLE SUMMARY: The imaging of prostate cancer has evolved over the last few decades with molecular imaging, especially Positron Emission Tomography (PET) replacing conventional CT and MRI in patients with prostate cancer recurrence. These recent advances in PET imaging have allowed for a better localization of disease recurrence, and a better characterization of disease extent. Beyond localization and characterization, new uses for PET imaging have emerged, with PET agents now playing a role in assessing the response to treatment at the receptor level, and also helping to determine patient prognosis and survival. ABSTRACT: Prostate cancer is the most common non-dermatologic cancer in men, and one of the leading causes of cancer-related mortality. The incidence of prostate cancer increases precipitously after the age of 65 and demonstrates variable aggressiveness, depending on its grade and stage at diagnosis. Despite recent advancements in prostate cancer treatment, recurrence is seen in 25% of patients. Advancements in prostate cancer Positron Emission Tomography (PET) molecular imaging and recent United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approvals have led to several new options for evaluating prostate cancer. This manuscript will review the commonly used molecular imaging agents, with an emphasis on Fluorine-18 fluciclovine (Axumin) and PSMA-ligand agents, including their protocols, imaging interpretation, and pitfalls. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9913636 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-99136362023-02-11 Prostate Cancer—PET Imaging Update Jetty, Sankarsh Loftus, James Ryan Patel, Abhinav Gupta, Akshya Puri, Savita Dogra, Vikram Cancers (Basel) Review SIMPLE SUMMARY: The imaging of prostate cancer has evolved over the last few decades with molecular imaging, especially Positron Emission Tomography (PET) replacing conventional CT and MRI in patients with prostate cancer recurrence. These recent advances in PET imaging have allowed for a better localization of disease recurrence, and a better characterization of disease extent. Beyond localization and characterization, new uses for PET imaging have emerged, with PET agents now playing a role in assessing the response to treatment at the receptor level, and also helping to determine patient prognosis and survival. ABSTRACT: Prostate cancer is the most common non-dermatologic cancer in men, and one of the leading causes of cancer-related mortality. The incidence of prostate cancer increases precipitously after the age of 65 and demonstrates variable aggressiveness, depending on its grade and stage at diagnosis. Despite recent advancements in prostate cancer treatment, recurrence is seen in 25% of patients. Advancements in prostate cancer Positron Emission Tomography (PET) molecular imaging and recent United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approvals have led to several new options for evaluating prostate cancer. This manuscript will review the commonly used molecular imaging agents, with an emphasis on Fluorine-18 fluciclovine (Axumin) and PSMA-ligand agents, including their protocols, imaging interpretation, and pitfalls. MDPI 2023-01-28 /pmc/articles/PMC9913636/ /pubmed/36765754 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers15030796 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Review Jetty, Sankarsh Loftus, James Ryan Patel, Abhinav Gupta, Akshya Puri, Savita Dogra, Vikram Prostate Cancer—PET Imaging Update |
title | Prostate Cancer—PET Imaging Update |
title_full | Prostate Cancer—PET Imaging Update |
title_fullStr | Prostate Cancer—PET Imaging Update |
title_full_unstemmed | Prostate Cancer—PET Imaging Update |
title_short | Prostate Cancer—PET Imaging Update |
title_sort | prostate cancer—pet imaging update |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9913636/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36765754 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers15030796 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT jettysankarsh prostatecancerpetimagingupdate AT loftusjamesryan prostatecancerpetimagingupdate AT patelabhinav prostatecancerpetimagingupdate AT guptaakshya prostatecancerpetimagingupdate AT purisavita prostatecancerpetimagingupdate AT dogravikram prostatecancerpetimagingupdate |