Cargando…

Application of the AT(N) and Other CSF Classification Systems in Behavioral Variant Frontotemporal Dementia

Background: Patients with a frontotemporal lobar degeneration (FTLD) usually manifest with behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia (bvFTD). Alzheimer’s disease (AD) may also manifest with a predominant behavioral-dysexecutive syndrome, similar to bvFTD. Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) biomarkers, such...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Constantinides, Vasilios C., Boufidou, Fotini, Bourbouli, Mara, Pyrgelis, Efstratios-Stylianos, Ghika, Apostolia, Koros, Christos, Liakakis, George, Papageorgiou, Sokratis, Stefanis, Leonidas, Paraskevas, George P., Kapaki, Elisabeth
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9914032/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36766437
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics13030332
Descripción
Sumario:Background: Patients with a frontotemporal lobar degeneration (FTLD) usually manifest with behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia (bvFTD). Alzheimer’s disease (AD) may also manifest with a predominant behavioral-dysexecutive syndrome, similar to bvFTD. Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) biomarkers, such as total tau (τ(T)), phosphorylated tau (τ(P-181)) and amyloid beta with 42 amino-acids (Aβ(42)), can predict AD pathology in vivo. The aim of this study was to compare the τ(T)/Aβ(42) and τ(P-181)/Aβ(42) ratios, the BIOMARKAPD/ABSI criteria and the AT(N) classification system in a cohort of bvFTD patients. Methods: A total of 105 bvFTD patients (21 possible bvFTD; 20%) with CSF data, examined from 2008 to 2022, were included. Seventy-eight AD patients and 62 control subjects were included. The CSF biomarkers were measured with Innotest (2008–2017 subcohort) and EUROIMMUN (2017–2022 subcohort) ELISAs. Results: Depending on the classification system, 7.6 to 28.6% of bvFTD had an AD biochemical profile. The τ(T)/Aβ(42) and τ(P-181)/Aβ(42) ratios classified more patients as AD compared to the BIOMARKAPD/ABSI and AT(N) systems. The patients with possible bvFTD had higher frequencies of AD compared to the probable bvFTD patients. Conclusions: The four classification criteria of CSF AD biomarkers resulted in differences in AD allocation in this bvFTD cohort. A consensus on the optimal classification criteria of CSF AD biomarkers is pivotal.