Cargando…

A Comparison of MGMT Testing by MSP and qMSP in Paired Snap-Frozen and Formalin-Fixed Paraffin-Embedded Gliomas

Comparative analysis of the conventional methylation-specific PCR (MSP) vs. the quantitative MSP (qMSP) assessment of the O(6)-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) promoter methylation status in 34 snap-frozen (SF) glioma samples was performed. The accuracy of the semi-quantitative MSP was com...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lazarević, Milica, Jovanović, Nikola, Cvetković, Vladimir J., Tošić, Svetlana, Vitorović, Jelena, Stamenković, Slaviša, Nikolov, Vesna, Vidović, Nataša, Kostić Perić, Jelena, Jovanović, Marija, Mitrović, Tatjana
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9914267/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36766464
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics13030360
_version_ 1784885627423031296
author Lazarević, Milica
Jovanović, Nikola
Cvetković, Vladimir J.
Tošić, Svetlana
Vitorović, Jelena
Stamenković, Slaviša
Nikolov, Vesna
Vidović, Nataša
Kostić Perić, Jelena
Jovanović, Marija
Mitrović, Tatjana
author_facet Lazarević, Milica
Jovanović, Nikola
Cvetković, Vladimir J.
Tošić, Svetlana
Vitorović, Jelena
Stamenković, Slaviša
Nikolov, Vesna
Vidović, Nataša
Kostić Perić, Jelena
Jovanović, Marija
Mitrović, Tatjana
author_sort Lazarević, Milica
collection PubMed
description Comparative analysis of the conventional methylation-specific PCR (MSP) vs. the quantitative MSP (qMSP) assessment of the O(6)-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) promoter methylation status in 34 snap-frozen (SF) glioma samples was performed. The accuracy of the semi-quantitative MSP was compared with the corresponding qMSP semi-quantitative values using two semi-quantitative cut-off values (0—unmethylated and 1—weakly methylated) to discriminate methylated from unmethylated samples. In the case of the cut-off value 0, MSP test showed 80.0% sensitivity and 78.9% specificity compared to the reference qMSP analysis. However, when using the cut-off value 1, the diagnostic accuracy of the MSP test was significantly higher (85.7% sensitivity, 85.2% specificity). Fleiss’ Kappa statistical analyses indicated moderate agreement (Fleiss’ Kappa Coefficient = 0.509; 70.59% agreement) between MSP and qMSP semi-quantitative measurements of MGMT promoter methylation in glioma patients, justifying the conventional MSP use in diagnostics and confirming its high reliability. Further, we aimed to compare the validity of SF and formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) glioma samples for MGMT testing. Statistical analyses indicated moderate overall agreement of FFPE glioma samples and SF MSP semi-quantitative measurements (Fleiss’ Kappa Coefficient = 0.516/0.509; 70.0% agreement) and emphasized their low reliability in the assessment of highly methylated MGMT promoter samples.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9914267
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-99142672023-02-11 A Comparison of MGMT Testing by MSP and qMSP in Paired Snap-Frozen and Formalin-Fixed Paraffin-Embedded Gliomas Lazarević, Milica Jovanović, Nikola Cvetković, Vladimir J. Tošić, Svetlana Vitorović, Jelena Stamenković, Slaviša Nikolov, Vesna Vidović, Nataša Kostić Perić, Jelena Jovanović, Marija Mitrović, Tatjana Diagnostics (Basel) Article Comparative analysis of the conventional methylation-specific PCR (MSP) vs. the quantitative MSP (qMSP) assessment of the O(6)-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) promoter methylation status in 34 snap-frozen (SF) glioma samples was performed. The accuracy of the semi-quantitative MSP was compared with the corresponding qMSP semi-quantitative values using two semi-quantitative cut-off values (0—unmethylated and 1—weakly methylated) to discriminate methylated from unmethylated samples. In the case of the cut-off value 0, MSP test showed 80.0% sensitivity and 78.9% specificity compared to the reference qMSP analysis. However, when using the cut-off value 1, the diagnostic accuracy of the MSP test was significantly higher (85.7% sensitivity, 85.2% specificity). Fleiss’ Kappa statistical analyses indicated moderate agreement (Fleiss’ Kappa Coefficient = 0.509; 70.59% agreement) between MSP and qMSP semi-quantitative measurements of MGMT promoter methylation in glioma patients, justifying the conventional MSP use in diagnostics and confirming its high reliability. Further, we aimed to compare the validity of SF and formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) glioma samples for MGMT testing. Statistical analyses indicated moderate overall agreement of FFPE glioma samples and SF MSP semi-quantitative measurements (Fleiss’ Kappa Coefficient = 0.516/0.509; 70.0% agreement) and emphasized their low reliability in the assessment of highly methylated MGMT promoter samples. MDPI 2023-01-18 /pmc/articles/PMC9914267/ /pubmed/36766464 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics13030360 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Lazarević, Milica
Jovanović, Nikola
Cvetković, Vladimir J.
Tošić, Svetlana
Vitorović, Jelena
Stamenković, Slaviša
Nikolov, Vesna
Vidović, Nataša
Kostić Perić, Jelena
Jovanović, Marija
Mitrović, Tatjana
A Comparison of MGMT Testing by MSP and qMSP in Paired Snap-Frozen and Formalin-Fixed Paraffin-Embedded Gliomas
title A Comparison of MGMT Testing by MSP and qMSP in Paired Snap-Frozen and Formalin-Fixed Paraffin-Embedded Gliomas
title_full A Comparison of MGMT Testing by MSP and qMSP in Paired Snap-Frozen and Formalin-Fixed Paraffin-Embedded Gliomas
title_fullStr A Comparison of MGMT Testing by MSP and qMSP in Paired Snap-Frozen and Formalin-Fixed Paraffin-Embedded Gliomas
title_full_unstemmed A Comparison of MGMT Testing by MSP and qMSP in Paired Snap-Frozen and Formalin-Fixed Paraffin-Embedded Gliomas
title_short A Comparison of MGMT Testing by MSP and qMSP in Paired Snap-Frozen and Formalin-Fixed Paraffin-Embedded Gliomas
title_sort comparison of mgmt testing by msp and qmsp in paired snap-frozen and formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded gliomas
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9914267/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36766464
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics13030360
work_keys_str_mv AT lazarevicmilica acomparisonofmgmttestingbymspandqmspinpairedsnapfrozenandformalinfixedparaffinembeddedgliomas
AT jovanovicnikola acomparisonofmgmttestingbymspandqmspinpairedsnapfrozenandformalinfixedparaffinembeddedgliomas
AT cvetkovicvladimirj acomparisonofmgmttestingbymspandqmspinpairedsnapfrozenandformalinfixedparaffinembeddedgliomas
AT tosicsvetlana acomparisonofmgmttestingbymspandqmspinpairedsnapfrozenandformalinfixedparaffinembeddedgliomas
AT vitorovicjelena acomparisonofmgmttestingbymspandqmspinpairedsnapfrozenandformalinfixedparaffinembeddedgliomas
AT stamenkovicslavisa acomparisonofmgmttestingbymspandqmspinpairedsnapfrozenandformalinfixedparaffinembeddedgliomas
AT nikolovvesna acomparisonofmgmttestingbymspandqmspinpairedsnapfrozenandformalinfixedparaffinembeddedgliomas
AT vidovicnatasa acomparisonofmgmttestingbymspandqmspinpairedsnapfrozenandformalinfixedparaffinembeddedgliomas
AT kosticpericjelena acomparisonofmgmttestingbymspandqmspinpairedsnapfrozenandformalinfixedparaffinembeddedgliomas
AT jovanovicmarija acomparisonofmgmttestingbymspandqmspinpairedsnapfrozenandformalinfixedparaffinembeddedgliomas
AT mitrovictatjana acomparisonofmgmttestingbymspandqmspinpairedsnapfrozenandformalinfixedparaffinembeddedgliomas
AT lazarevicmilica comparisonofmgmttestingbymspandqmspinpairedsnapfrozenandformalinfixedparaffinembeddedgliomas
AT jovanovicnikola comparisonofmgmttestingbymspandqmspinpairedsnapfrozenandformalinfixedparaffinembeddedgliomas
AT cvetkovicvladimirj comparisonofmgmttestingbymspandqmspinpairedsnapfrozenandformalinfixedparaffinembeddedgliomas
AT tosicsvetlana comparisonofmgmttestingbymspandqmspinpairedsnapfrozenandformalinfixedparaffinembeddedgliomas
AT vitorovicjelena comparisonofmgmttestingbymspandqmspinpairedsnapfrozenandformalinfixedparaffinembeddedgliomas
AT stamenkovicslavisa comparisonofmgmttestingbymspandqmspinpairedsnapfrozenandformalinfixedparaffinembeddedgliomas
AT nikolovvesna comparisonofmgmttestingbymspandqmspinpairedsnapfrozenandformalinfixedparaffinembeddedgliomas
AT vidovicnatasa comparisonofmgmttestingbymspandqmspinpairedsnapfrozenandformalinfixedparaffinembeddedgliomas
AT kosticpericjelena comparisonofmgmttestingbymspandqmspinpairedsnapfrozenandformalinfixedparaffinembeddedgliomas
AT jovanovicmarija comparisonofmgmttestingbymspandqmspinpairedsnapfrozenandformalinfixedparaffinembeddedgliomas
AT mitrovictatjana comparisonofmgmttestingbymspandqmspinpairedsnapfrozenandformalinfixedparaffinembeddedgliomas