Cargando…
Prone versus Supine FDG PET/CT in the Staging of Breast Cancer
Supine [18F]Fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission technology/computed tomography (PET/CT) is a commonly used modality for the initial staging of breast cancer, and several previous studies have shown superior sensitivity and specificity of prone FDG PET/CT in comparison to its supine counterpar...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9914486/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36766472 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics13030367 |
_version_ | 1784885680822812672 |
---|---|
author | Nassar, Lara Kassas, Mutaz Abi-Ghanem, Alain S. El-Jebai, Malak Al-Zakleet, Safaa Baassiri, Amro S. Naccoul, Rami Abou Barakat, Andrew Tfayli, Arafat Assi, Hazem Berjawi, Ghina Estrada-Lobato, Enrique Giammarile, Francesco Vinjamuri, Sobhan Haidar, Mohamad |
author_facet | Nassar, Lara Kassas, Mutaz Abi-Ghanem, Alain S. El-Jebai, Malak Al-Zakleet, Safaa Baassiri, Amro S. Naccoul, Rami Abou Barakat, Andrew Tfayli, Arafat Assi, Hazem Berjawi, Ghina Estrada-Lobato, Enrique Giammarile, Francesco Vinjamuri, Sobhan Haidar, Mohamad |
author_sort | Nassar, Lara |
collection | PubMed |
description | Supine [18F]Fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission technology/computed tomography (PET/CT) is a commonly used modality for the initial staging of breast cancer, and several previous studies have shown superior sensitivity and specificity of prone FDG PET/CT in comparison to its supine counterpart. This retrospective study included 25 females with breast cancer referred for staging. They underwent supine FDG PET/CT followed by prone FDG PET/CT. The outcomes were: number of primary breast lesions, anatomical site of FDG-avid lymph nodes (LNs), and number and type of bone lesions, with SUVmax of all corresponding parameters. Performance was superior in prone acquisition compared to supine acquisition, with the respective results: 29 vs. 22 breast tumor lesions detected, 62 vs. 27 FDG-avid axillary LNs detected, sensitivity of 68% vs. 57%, specificity of 64% vs. 53%. The detection rate of axillary LNs in the prone position was significantly higher (p = 0.001). SUVmax for breast tumor lesions (p = 0.000) and number of detected axillary LNs (p = 0.002) were significantly higher in prone acquisition. Five patients were upstaged after experts read the prone acquisition. Prone FDG PET/CT acquisition is a promising technique in detecting primary breast lesions and metastatic LNs possibly missed in supine acquisition, which may lead to change in patient staging and management. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9914486 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-99144862023-02-11 Prone versus Supine FDG PET/CT in the Staging of Breast Cancer Nassar, Lara Kassas, Mutaz Abi-Ghanem, Alain S. El-Jebai, Malak Al-Zakleet, Safaa Baassiri, Amro S. Naccoul, Rami Abou Barakat, Andrew Tfayli, Arafat Assi, Hazem Berjawi, Ghina Estrada-Lobato, Enrique Giammarile, Francesco Vinjamuri, Sobhan Haidar, Mohamad Diagnostics (Basel) Article Supine [18F]Fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission technology/computed tomography (PET/CT) is a commonly used modality for the initial staging of breast cancer, and several previous studies have shown superior sensitivity and specificity of prone FDG PET/CT in comparison to its supine counterpart. This retrospective study included 25 females with breast cancer referred for staging. They underwent supine FDG PET/CT followed by prone FDG PET/CT. The outcomes were: number of primary breast lesions, anatomical site of FDG-avid lymph nodes (LNs), and number and type of bone lesions, with SUVmax of all corresponding parameters. Performance was superior in prone acquisition compared to supine acquisition, with the respective results: 29 vs. 22 breast tumor lesions detected, 62 vs. 27 FDG-avid axillary LNs detected, sensitivity of 68% vs. 57%, specificity of 64% vs. 53%. The detection rate of axillary LNs in the prone position was significantly higher (p = 0.001). SUVmax for breast tumor lesions (p = 0.000) and number of detected axillary LNs (p = 0.002) were significantly higher in prone acquisition. Five patients were upstaged after experts read the prone acquisition. Prone FDG PET/CT acquisition is a promising technique in detecting primary breast lesions and metastatic LNs possibly missed in supine acquisition, which may lead to change in patient staging and management. MDPI 2023-01-19 /pmc/articles/PMC9914486/ /pubmed/36766472 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics13030367 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Nassar, Lara Kassas, Mutaz Abi-Ghanem, Alain S. El-Jebai, Malak Al-Zakleet, Safaa Baassiri, Amro S. Naccoul, Rami Abou Barakat, Andrew Tfayli, Arafat Assi, Hazem Berjawi, Ghina Estrada-Lobato, Enrique Giammarile, Francesco Vinjamuri, Sobhan Haidar, Mohamad Prone versus Supine FDG PET/CT in the Staging of Breast Cancer |
title | Prone versus Supine FDG PET/CT in the Staging of Breast Cancer |
title_full | Prone versus Supine FDG PET/CT in the Staging of Breast Cancer |
title_fullStr | Prone versus Supine FDG PET/CT in the Staging of Breast Cancer |
title_full_unstemmed | Prone versus Supine FDG PET/CT in the Staging of Breast Cancer |
title_short | Prone versus Supine FDG PET/CT in the Staging of Breast Cancer |
title_sort | prone versus supine fdg pet/ct in the staging of breast cancer |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9914486/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36766472 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics13030367 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT nassarlara proneversussupinefdgpetctinthestagingofbreastcancer AT kassasmutaz proneversussupinefdgpetctinthestagingofbreastcancer AT abighanemalains proneversussupinefdgpetctinthestagingofbreastcancer AT eljebaimalak proneversussupinefdgpetctinthestagingofbreastcancer AT alzakleetsafaa proneversussupinefdgpetctinthestagingofbreastcancer AT baassiriamros proneversussupinefdgpetctinthestagingofbreastcancer AT naccoulramiabou proneversussupinefdgpetctinthestagingofbreastcancer AT barakatandrew proneversussupinefdgpetctinthestagingofbreastcancer AT tfayliarafat proneversussupinefdgpetctinthestagingofbreastcancer AT assihazem proneversussupinefdgpetctinthestagingofbreastcancer AT berjawighina proneversussupinefdgpetctinthestagingofbreastcancer AT estradalobatoenrique proneversussupinefdgpetctinthestagingofbreastcancer AT giammarilefrancesco proneversussupinefdgpetctinthestagingofbreastcancer AT vinjamurisobhan proneversussupinefdgpetctinthestagingofbreastcancer AT haidarmohamad proneversussupinefdgpetctinthestagingofbreastcancer |