Cargando…

[(18)F]FDG Uptake in Non-Infected Endovascular Grafts: A Retrospective Study

Purpose: After endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR), an increased [(18)F]FDG uptake may be observed at PET/CT, being common to both vascular graft/endograft infection (VGEI) and sterile post-surgical inflammation. Increased non-specific metabolic activity, due to foreign body reaction, can persist fo...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lauri, Chiara, Signore, Alberto, Campagna, Giuseppe, Aloisi, Francesco, Taurino, Maurizio, Sirignano, Pasqualino
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9914612/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36766514
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics13030409
_version_ 1784885706419601408
author Lauri, Chiara
Signore, Alberto
Campagna, Giuseppe
Aloisi, Francesco
Taurino, Maurizio
Sirignano, Pasqualino
author_facet Lauri, Chiara
Signore, Alberto
Campagna, Giuseppe
Aloisi, Francesco
Taurino, Maurizio
Sirignano, Pasqualino
author_sort Lauri, Chiara
collection PubMed
description Purpose: After endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR), an increased [(18)F]FDG uptake may be observed at PET/CT, being common to both vascular graft/endograft infection (VGEI) and sterile post-surgical inflammation. Increased non-specific metabolic activity, due to foreign body reaction, can persist for several years after surgery, thus complicating the interpretation of PET/CT studies. In this paper, we aimed to assess [(18)F]FDG distribution at different time-points after the implant of abdominal Endurant(®) endografts in patients without suspicion of infection. Methods: We retrospectively evaluated [(18)F]FDG/CT in 16 oncological patients who underwent abdominal aortic aneurysm exclusion with Endurant(®) grafts. Patients had no clinical suspicion of infection and were followed up for at least 24 months after scan. [(18)F]FDG PET/CT scans were interpreted using both visual and semi-quantitative analyses. Results: The time between the EVAR procedure and [(18)F]FDG PET/CT ranged between 1 and 36 months. All grafts showed mild and diffuse [(18)F]FDG uptake without a focal pattern. Mean values of SUVmax were 2.63 ± 0.48 (95% CI 2.38–2.88); for SUVmean 1.90 ± 0.33 (95% CI 1.72–2.08); for T/B ratios 1.43 ± 0.41 (95% CI 1.21–1.65). SUVmax and SUVmean were not correlated to the time elapsed from the procedure, but we observed a declining trend in T/B ratio over time. Conclusions: Endovascular implant of Endurant(®) grafts does not cause a significant inflammatory reaction. The evidence of faint and diffuse [(18)F]FDG uptake along the graft can reliably exclude an infection, even in early post-procedural phases. Therefore, in patients with a low probability of VGEI, [(18)F]FDG PET/CT can also be performed immediately after EVAR.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9914612
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-99146122023-02-11 [(18)F]FDG Uptake in Non-Infected Endovascular Grafts: A Retrospective Study Lauri, Chiara Signore, Alberto Campagna, Giuseppe Aloisi, Francesco Taurino, Maurizio Sirignano, Pasqualino Diagnostics (Basel) Article Purpose: After endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR), an increased [(18)F]FDG uptake may be observed at PET/CT, being common to both vascular graft/endograft infection (VGEI) and sterile post-surgical inflammation. Increased non-specific metabolic activity, due to foreign body reaction, can persist for several years after surgery, thus complicating the interpretation of PET/CT studies. In this paper, we aimed to assess [(18)F]FDG distribution at different time-points after the implant of abdominal Endurant(®) endografts in patients without suspicion of infection. Methods: We retrospectively evaluated [(18)F]FDG/CT in 16 oncological patients who underwent abdominal aortic aneurysm exclusion with Endurant(®) grafts. Patients had no clinical suspicion of infection and were followed up for at least 24 months after scan. [(18)F]FDG PET/CT scans were interpreted using both visual and semi-quantitative analyses. Results: The time between the EVAR procedure and [(18)F]FDG PET/CT ranged between 1 and 36 months. All grafts showed mild and diffuse [(18)F]FDG uptake without a focal pattern. Mean values of SUVmax were 2.63 ± 0.48 (95% CI 2.38–2.88); for SUVmean 1.90 ± 0.33 (95% CI 1.72–2.08); for T/B ratios 1.43 ± 0.41 (95% CI 1.21–1.65). SUVmax and SUVmean were not correlated to the time elapsed from the procedure, but we observed a declining trend in T/B ratio over time. Conclusions: Endovascular implant of Endurant(®) grafts does not cause a significant inflammatory reaction. The evidence of faint and diffuse [(18)F]FDG uptake along the graft can reliably exclude an infection, even in early post-procedural phases. Therefore, in patients with a low probability of VGEI, [(18)F]FDG PET/CT can also be performed immediately after EVAR. MDPI 2023-01-23 /pmc/articles/PMC9914612/ /pubmed/36766514 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics13030409 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Lauri, Chiara
Signore, Alberto
Campagna, Giuseppe
Aloisi, Francesco
Taurino, Maurizio
Sirignano, Pasqualino
[(18)F]FDG Uptake in Non-Infected Endovascular Grafts: A Retrospective Study
title [(18)F]FDG Uptake in Non-Infected Endovascular Grafts: A Retrospective Study
title_full [(18)F]FDG Uptake in Non-Infected Endovascular Grafts: A Retrospective Study
title_fullStr [(18)F]FDG Uptake in Non-Infected Endovascular Grafts: A Retrospective Study
title_full_unstemmed [(18)F]FDG Uptake in Non-Infected Endovascular Grafts: A Retrospective Study
title_short [(18)F]FDG Uptake in Non-Infected Endovascular Grafts: A Retrospective Study
title_sort [(18)f]fdg uptake in non-infected endovascular grafts: a retrospective study
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9914612/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36766514
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics13030409
work_keys_str_mv AT laurichiara 18ffdguptakeinnoninfectedendovasculargraftsaretrospectivestudy
AT signorealberto 18ffdguptakeinnoninfectedendovasculargraftsaretrospectivestudy
AT campagnagiuseppe 18ffdguptakeinnoninfectedendovasculargraftsaretrospectivestudy
AT aloisifrancesco 18ffdguptakeinnoninfectedendovasculargraftsaretrospectivestudy
AT taurinomaurizio 18ffdguptakeinnoninfectedendovasculargraftsaretrospectivestudy
AT sirignanopasqualino 18ffdguptakeinnoninfectedendovasculargraftsaretrospectivestudy