Cargando…

Closing the Gap: From Research to Practice in Mental Health Interventions

Evidence-based practice is critical but challenging in mental health. Rigorous research-proven interventions often do not yield expected results in the clinical practice. This study aimed to explore factors contributing to the effectiveness of Occupational Connections (OC)—an intervention for promot...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lipskaya-Velikovsky, Lena, Krupa, Terry
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9915162/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36767508
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20032141
_version_ 1784885837256720384
author Lipskaya-Velikovsky, Lena
Krupa, Terry
author_facet Lipskaya-Velikovsky, Lena
Krupa, Terry
author_sort Lipskaya-Velikovsky, Lena
collection PubMed
description Evidence-based practice is critical but challenging in mental health. Rigorous research-proven interventions often do not yield expected results in the clinical practice. This study aimed to explore factors contributing to the effectiveness of Occupational Connections (OC)—an intervention for promotion of engagement in meaningful occupations in serious mental illness (SMI)—based on case series study of three quasi-experimental studies. The studies focused on people with SMI, admitted to intensive mental health services participated in the OC, as well as on a control condition group. Similar evaluation procedures throughout these studies addressed primary outcomes of participation dimensions and recovery orientation, as well as secondary outcomes of functional capacity, cognition, and symptom severity. Patterns of changes in outcome measures varied between the three studies as to direction and extension. In the OC groups, 29–60% of the outcome measurements were changed, in comparison to 29–43% of measurements in the control groups. The secondary outcomes were consistently improved in the OC (18–100% of measurements) in comparison to the control (18–67%). The analysis of the studies revealed that clinical effectiveness of participation-oriented intervention varied dependent on interplay between the clinical context, clinician actions, served persons’ characteristics, and evidence-building process. These factors should be considered to maximize research benefits for practice.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9915162
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-99151622023-02-11 Closing the Gap: From Research to Practice in Mental Health Interventions Lipskaya-Velikovsky, Lena Krupa, Terry Int J Environ Res Public Health Case Report Evidence-based practice is critical but challenging in mental health. Rigorous research-proven interventions often do not yield expected results in the clinical practice. This study aimed to explore factors contributing to the effectiveness of Occupational Connections (OC)—an intervention for promotion of engagement in meaningful occupations in serious mental illness (SMI)—based on case series study of three quasi-experimental studies. The studies focused on people with SMI, admitted to intensive mental health services participated in the OC, as well as on a control condition group. Similar evaluation procedures throughout these studies addressed primary outcomes of participation dimensions and recovery orientation, as well as secondary outcomes of functional capacity, cognition, and symptom severity. Patterns of changes in outcome measures varied between the three studies as to direction and extension. In the OC groups, 29–60% of the outcome measurements were changed, in comparison to 29–43% of measurements in the control groups. The secondary outcomes were consistently improved in the OC (18–100% of measurements) in comparison to the control (18–67%). The analysis of the studies revealed that clinical effectiveness of participation-oriented intervention varied dependent on interplay between the clinical context, clinician actions, served persons’ characteristics, and evidence-building process. These factors should be considered to maximize research benefits for practice. MDPI 2023-01-24 /pmc/articles/PMC9915162/ /pubmed/36767508 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20032141 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Case Report
Lipskaya-Velikovsky, Lena
Krupa, Terry
Closing the Gap: From Research to Practice in Mental Health Interventions
title Closing the Gap: From Research to Practice in Mental Health Interventions
title_full Closing the Gap: From Research to Practice in Mental Health Interventions
title_fullStr Closing the Gap: From Research to Practice in Mental Health Interventions
title_full_unstemmed Closing the Gap: From Research to Practice in Mental Health Interventions
title_short Closing the Gap: From Research to Practice in Mental Health Interventions
title_sort closing the gap: from research to practice in mental health interventions
topic Case Report
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9915162/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36767508
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20032141
work_keys_str_mv AT lipskayavelikovskylena closingthegapfromresearchtopracticeinmentalhealthinterventions
AT krupaterry closingthegapfromresearchtopracticeinmentalhealthinterventions