Cargando…

Environmental Acceptability of Geotechnical Composites from Recycled Materials: Comparative Study of Laboratory and Field Investigations

The environmental properties of three geotechnical composites made by recycling wastes were investigated on a laboratory scale and in the field with the use of lysimeters designated for the revitalization of degraded mining sites. Composites were prepared by combining the mine waste with paper-mill...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Đurić, Marija, Zalar Serjun, Vesna, Mladenovič, Ana, Mauko Pranjić, Alenka, Milačič, Radmila, Ščančar, Janez, Urbanc, Janko, Mali, Nina, Pavlin, Alenka, Turk, Janez, Oprčkal, Primož
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9915455/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36767380
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20032014
_version_ 1784885908257898496
author Đurić, Marija
Zalar Serjun, Vesna
Mladenovič, Ana
Mauko Pranjić, Alenka
Milačič, Radmila
Ščančar, Janez
Urbanc, Janko
Mali, Nina
Pavlin, Alenka
Turk, Janez
Oprčkal, Primož
author_facet Đurić, Marija
Zalar Serjun, Vesna
Mladenovič, Ana
Mauko Pranjić, Alenka
Milačič, Radmila
Ščančar, Janez
Urbanc, Janko
Mali, Nina
Pavlin, Alenka
Turk, Janez
Oprčkal, Primož
author_sort Đurić, Marija
collection PubMed
description The environmental properties of three geotechnical composites made by recycling wastes were investigated on a laboratory scale and in the field with the use of lysimeters designated for the revitalization of degraded mining sites. Composites were prepared by combining the mine waste with paper-mill sludge and foundry sand (Composite 1), with digestate from municipal waste and paper ash (Composite 2), and with coal ash, foundry slag and waste incineration bottom ash (Composite 3). The results of laboratory leaching tests proved that Composites 1 and 3 are environmentally acceptable, according to the legislative limits, as the potentially hazardous substances were immobilized, while in Composite 2, the legislative limits were exceeded. In the field lysimeters, the lowest rate of leaching was determined for optimally compacted Composites 1 and 3, while for Composite 2 the leaching of Cu was high. This study proved that optimally installed Composites 1 and 3 are environmentally acceptable for use in construction as an alternative to virgin materials, for the revitalization of degraded mining sites or, along with Composite 2, for closure operations with landfills. In this way, locally available waste streams are valorised and channelized into a beneficial and sustainable recycling practice.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9915455
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-99154552023-02-11 Environmental Acceptability of Geotechnical Composites from Recycled Materials: Comparative Study of Laboratory and Field Investigations Đurić, Marija Zalar Serjun, Vesna Mladenovič, Ana Mauko Pranjić, Alenka Milačič, Radmila Ščančar, Janez Urbanc, Janko Mali, Nina Pavlin, Alenka Turk, Janez Oprčkal, Primož Int J Environ Res Public Health Article The environmental properties of three geotechnical composites made by recycling wastes were investigated on a laboratory scale and in the field with the use of lysimeters designated for the revitalization of degraded mining sites. Composites were prepared by combining the mine waste with paper-mill sludge and foundry sand (Composite 1), with digestate from municipal waste and paper ash (Composite 2), and with coal ash, foundry slag and waste incineration bottom ash (Composite 3). The results of laboratory leaching tests proved that Composites 1 and 3 are environmentally acceptable, according to the legislative limits, as the potentially hazardous substances were immobilized, while in Composite 2, the legislative limits were exceeded. In the field lysimeters, the lowest rate of leaching was determined for optimally compacted Composites 1 and 3, while for Composite 2 the leaching of Cu was high. This study proved that optimally installed Composites 1 and 3 are environmentally acceptable for use in construction as an alternative to virgin materials, for the revitalization of degraded mining sites or, along with Composite 2, for closure operations with landfills. In this way, locally available waste streams are valorised and channelized into a beneficial and sustainable recycling practice. MDPI 2023-01-21 /pmc/articles/PMC9915455/ /pubmed/36767380 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20032014 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Đurić, Marija
Zalar Serjun, Vesna
Mladenovič, Ana
Mauko Pranjić, Alenka
Milačič, Radmila
Ščančar, Janez
Urbanc, Janko
Mali, Nina
Pavlin, Alenka
Turk, Janez
Oprčkal, Primož
Environmental Acceptability of Geotechnical Composites from Recycled Materials: Comparative Study of Laboratory and Field Investigations
title Environmental Acceptability of Geotechnical Composites from Recycled Materials: Comparative Study of Laboratory and Field Investigations
title_full Environmental Acceptability of Geotechnical Composites from Recycled Materials: Comparative Study of Laboratory and Field Investigations
title_fullStr Environmental Acceptability of Geotechnical Composites from Recycled Materials: Comparative Study of Laboratory and Field Investigations
title_full_unstemmed Environmental Acceptability of Geotechnical Composites from Recycled Materials: Comparative Study of Laboratory and Field Investigations
title_short Environmental Acceptability of Geotechnical Composites from Recycled Materials: Comparative Study of Laboratory and Field Investigations
title_sort environmental acceptability of geotechnical composites from recycled materials: comparative study of laboratory and field investigations
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9915455/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36767380
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20032014
work_keys_str_mv AT đuricmarija environmentalacceptabilityofgeotechnicalcompositesfromrecycledmaterialscomparativestudyoflaboratoryandfieldinvestigations
AT zalarserjunvesna environmentalacceptabilityofgeotechnicalcompositesfromrecycledmaterialscomparativestudyoflaboratoryandfieldinvestigations
AT mladenovicana environmentalacceptabilityofgeotechnicalcompositesfromrecycledmaterialscomparativestudyoflaboratoryandfieldinvestigations
AT maukopranjicalenka environmentalacceptabilityofgeotechnicalcompositesfromrecycledmaterialscomparativestudyoflaboratoryandfieldinvestigations
AT milacicradmila environmentalacceptabilityofgeotechnicalcompositesfromrecycledmaterialscomparativestudyoflaboratoryandfieldinvestigations
AT scancarjanez environmentalacceptabilityofgeotechnicalcompositesfromrecycledmaterialscomparativestudyoflaboratoryandfieldinvestigations
AT urbancjanko environmentalacceptabilityofgeotechnicalcompositesfromrecycledmaterialscomparativestudyoflaboratoryandfieldinvestigations
AT malinina environmentalacceptabilityofgeotechnicalcompositesfromrecycledmaterialscomparativestudyoflaboratoryandfieldinvestigations
AT pavlinalenka environmentalacceptabilityofgeotechnicalcompositesfromrecycledmaterialscomparativestudyoflaboratoryandfieldinvestigations
AT turkjanez environmentalacceptabilityofgeotechnicalcompositesfromrecycledmaterialscomparativestudyoflaboratoryandfieldinvestigations
AT oprckalprimoz environmentalacceptabilityofgeotechnicalcompositesfromrecycledmaterialscomparativestudyoflaboratoryandfieldinvestigations