Cargando…
Environmental Acceptability of Geotechnical Composites from Recycled Materials: Comparative Study of Laboratory and Field Investigations
The environmental properties of three geotechnical composites made by recycling wastes were investigated on a laboratory scale and in the field with the use of lysimeters designated for the revitalization of degraded mining sites. Composites were prepared by combining the mine waste with paper-mill...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9915455/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36767380 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20032014 |
_version_ | 1784885908257898496 |
---|---|
author | Đurić, Marija Zalar Serjun, Vesna Mladenovič, Ana Mauko Pranjić, Alenka Milačič, Radmila Ščančar, Janez Urbanc, Janko Mali, Nina Pavlin, Alenka Turk, Janez Oprčkal, Primož |
author_facet | Đurić, Marija Zalar Serjun, Vesna Mladenovič, Ana Mauko Pranjić, Alenka Milačič, Radmila Ščančar, Janez Urbanc, Janko Mali, Nina Pavlin, Alenka Turk, Janez Oprčkal, Primož |
author_sort | Đurić, Marija |
collection | PubMed |
description | The environmental properties of three geotechnical composites made by recycling wastes were investigated on a laboratory scale and in the field with the use of lysimeters designated for the revitalization of degraded mining sites. Composites were prepared by combining the mine waste with paper-mill sludge and foundry sand (Composite 1), with digestate from municipal waste and paper ash (Composite 2), and with coal ash, foundry slag and waste incineration bottom ash (Composite 3). The results of laboratory leaching tests proved that Composites 1 and 3 are environmentally acceptable, according to the legislative limits, as the potentially hazardous substances were immobilized, while in Composite 2, the legislative limits were exceeded. In the field lysimeters, the lowest rate of leaching was determined for optimally compacted Composites 1 and 3, while for Composite 2 the leaching of Cu was high. This study proved that optimally installed Composites 1 and 3 are environmentally acceptable for use in construction as an alternative to virgin materials, for the revitalization of degraded mining sites or, along with Composite 2, for closure operations with landfills. In this way, locally available waste streams are valorised and channelized into a beneficial and sustainable recycling practice. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9915455 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-99154552023-02-11 Environmental Acceptability of Geotechnical Composites from Recycled Materials: Comparative Study of Laboratory and Field Investigations Đurić, Marija Zalar Serjun, Vesna Mladenovič, Ana Mauko Pranjić, Alenka Milačič, Radmila Ščančar, Janez Urbanc, Janko Mali, Nina Pavlin, Alenka Turk, Janez Oprčkal, Primož Int J Environ Res Public Health Article The environmental properties of three geotechnical composites made by recycling wastes were investigated on a laboratory scale and in the field with the use of lysimeters designated for the revitalization of degraded mining sites. Composites were prepared by combining the mine waste with paper-mill sludge and foundry sand (Composite 1), with digestate from municipal waste and paper ash (Composite 2), and with coal ash, foundry slag and waste incineration bottom ash (Composite 3). The results of laboratory leaching tests proved that Composites 1 and 3 are environmentally acceptable, according to the legislative limits, as the potentially hazardous substances were immobilized, while in Composite 2, the legislative limits were exceeded. In the field lysimeters, the lowest rate of leaching was determined for optimally compacted Composites 1 and 3, while for Composite 2 the leaching of Cu was high. This study proved that optimally installed Composites 1 and 3 are environmentally acceptable for use in construction as an alternative to virgin materials, for the revitalization of degraded mining sites or, along with Composite 2, for closure operations with landfills. In this way, locally available waste streams are valorised and channelized into a beneficial and sustainable recycling practice. MDPI 2023-01-21 /pmc/articles/PMC9915455/ /pubmed/36767380 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20032014 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Đurić, Marija Zalar Serjun, Vesna Mladenovič, Ana Mauko Pranjić, Alenka Milačič, Radmila Ščančar, Janez Urbanc, Janko Mali, Nina Pavlin, Alenka Turk, Janez Oprčkal, Primož Environmental Acceptability of Geotechnical Composites from Recycled Materials: Comparative Study of Laboratory and Field Investigations |
title | Environmental Acceptability of Geotechnical Composites from Recycled Materials: Comparative Study of Laboratory and Field Investigations |
title_full | Environmental Acceptability of Geotechnical Composites from Recycled Materials: Comparative Study of Laboratory and Field Investigations |
title_fullStr | Environmental Acceptability of Geotechnical Composites from Recycled Materials: Comparative Study of Laboratory and Field Investigations |
title_full_unstemmed | Environmental Acceptability of Geotechnical Composites from Recycled Materials: Comparative Study of Laboratory and Field Investigations |
title_short | Environmental Acceptability of Geotechnical Composites from Recycled Materials: Comparative Study of Laboratory and Field Investigations |
title_sort | environmental acceptability of geotechnical composites from recycled materials: comparative study of laboratory and field investigations |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9915455/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36767380 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20032014 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT đuricmarija environmentalacceptabilityofgeotechnicalcompositesfromrecycledmaterialscomparativestudyoflaboratoryandfieldinvestigations AT zalarserjunvesna environmentalacceptabilityofgeotechnicalcompositesfromrecycledmaterialscomparativestudyoflaboratoryandfieldinvestigations AT mladenovicana environmentalacceptabilityofgeotechnicalcompositesfromrecycledmaterialscomparativestudyoflaboratoryandfieldinvestigations AT maukopranjicalenka environmentalacceptabilityofgeotechnicalcompositesfromrecycledmaterialscomparativestudyoflaboratoryandfieldinvestigations AT milacicradmila environmentalacceptabilityofgeotechnicalcompositesfromrecycledmaterialscomparativestudyoflaboratoryandfieldinvestigations AT scancarjanez environmentalacceptabilityofgeotechnicalcompositesfromrecycledmaterialscomparativestudyoflaboratoryandfieldinvestigations AT urbancjanko environmentalacceptabilityofgeotechnicalcompositesfromrecycledmaterialscomparativestudyoflaboratoryandfieldinvestigations AT malinina environmentalacceptabilityofgeotechnicalcompositesfromrecycledmaterialscomparativestudyoflaboratoryandfieldinvestigations AT pavlinalenka environmentalacceptabilityofgeotechnicalcompositesfromrecycledmaterialscomparativestudyoflaboratoryandfieldinvestigations AT turkjanez environmentalacceptabilityofgeotechnicalcompositesfromrecycledmaterialscomparativestudyoflaboratoryandfieldinvestigations AT oprckalprimoz environmentalacceptabilityofgeotechnicalcompositesfromrecycledmaterialscomparativestudyoflaboratoryandfieldinvestigations |