Cargando…

Clinical outcomes for pleomorphic xanthoastrocytoma patients: an institutional experience

PURPOSE: Report our institutional experience with pleomorphic xanthoastrocytoma (PXA) to contribute to limited data on optimal management. METHODS: Patients with pathologically confirmed PXA treated at our institution between 1990 and 2019 were identified. Demographic information, tumor grade, treat...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sullivan, Jared, Chandler, James, Lesniak, Maciej, Tate, Matthew, Sonabend, Adam, Kalapurakal, John, Horbinski, Craig, Lukas, Rimas, Kumthekar, Priya, Sachdev, Sean
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: American Journal Experts 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9915763/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36778274
http://dx.doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-2535551/v1
Descripción
Sumario:PURPOSE: Report our institutional experience with pleomorphic xanthoastrocytoma (PXA) to contribute to limited data on optimal management. METHODS: Patients with pathologically confirmed PXA treated at our institution between 1990 and 2019 were identified. Demographic information, tumor grade, treatment variables, and clinical outcomes were collected from patient charts. Kaplan-Meier estimates were used to summarize two primary outcome measurements: progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Outcomes were stratified by tumor grade and extent of resection. Cox regression and log-rank testing were performed. RESULTS: We identified 17 patients with pathologically confirmed PXA. Two patients were excluded due to incomplete treatment information or < 6m of follow-up; 15 patients were analyzed (median follow-up 4.4y). Six patients had grade 2 PXA and 9 had grade 3 anaplastic PXA. The 2-year and 5-year PFS for the cohort was 57% and 33%, respectively; 2-year and 5-year OS was 93% and 75%, respectively. Patients with grade 2 tumors exhibited superior PFS compared to those with grade 3 tumors (2-year PFS: 100% vs. 28%, 5-year PFS: 60% vs. 14%), hazard ratio, 5.09 (95% CI:1.06–24.50), p = 0.02. Undergoing a GTR also yielded improved outcomes (hazard ratio: 0.38, p = 0.15). All but one (89%) of the grade 3 patients underwent RT. CONCLUSION: The poor survival of the cohort, especially with grade 3 tumors, suggests the need for more aggressive treatment, including maximal resection followed by intensive adjuvant therapy. Better prognostics of tumor recurrence are needed to guide the use of adjuvant therapy.