Cargando…
Peripheral nerve induction of inhibitory brain circuits to treat Tourette syndrome: A randomized crossover trial
A prior study showed that rhythmic, but not arrhythmic, 12 Hz stimulation of the median nerve (MNS) entrained sensorimotor cortex EEG signal, and found that 10 Hz MNS improved tics in Tourette syndrome (TS). However, no control condition was tested and stimulation blocks lasted only 1 minute. We set...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9915823/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36778375 http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/2023.02.01.23285304 |
_version_ | 1784885979534852096 |
---|---|
author | Iverson, Ann M. Arbuckle, Amanda L. Ueda, Keisuke Song, David Y. Bihun, Emily C. Koller, Jonathan M. Wallendorf, Michael Black, Kevin J. |
author_facet | Iverson, Ann M. Arbuckle, Amanda L. Ueda, Keisuke Song, David Y. Bihun, Emily C. Koller, Jonathan M. Wallendorf, Michael Black, Kevin J. |
author_sort | Iverson, Ann M. |
collection | PubMed |
description | A prior study showed that rhythmic, but not arrhythmic, 12 Hz stimulation of the median nerve (MNS) entrained sensorimotor cortex EEG signal, and found that 10 Hz MNS improved tics in Tourette syndrome (TS). However, no control condition was tested and stimulation blocks lasted only 1 minute. We set out to replicate the TS results and to test whether tic improvement occurs by the proposed cortical entrainment mechanism. Thirty-two people with TS, age 15-64, completed two study visits with repeated MNS on and off blocks in random order, one visit for rhythmic and one for arrhythmic MNS. Subjects and staff were blind to order; a video rater was additionally blind to stimulation and to order of visits and blocks. Rhythmic MNS at 10 Hz improved tics. Both rhythmic and arrhythmic 12 Hz MNS improved tic frequency, intensity and urges without significant difference. Participant masking was effective and there was no carryover effect. Several participants described dramatic benefit. Discomfort was minimal. MNS benefit did not persist after the end of stimulation. These results replicate the tic benefit from MNS, but show that the EEG entrainment hypothesis cannot explain that benefit. Another electrophysiological mechanism may explain benefit; alternatively, these data do not exclude a placebo effect. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9915823 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-99158232023-02-11 Peripheral nerve induction of inhibitory brain circuits to treat Tourette syndrome: A randomized crossover trial Iverson, Ann M. Arbuckle, Amanda L. Ueda, Keisuke Song, David Y. Bihun, Emily C. Koller, Jonathan M. Wallendorf, Michael Black, Kevin J. medRxiv Article A prior study showed that rhythmic, but not arrhythmic, 12 Hz stimulation of the median nerve (MNS) entrained sensorimotor cortex EEG signal, and found that 10 Hz MNS improved tics in Tourette syndrome (TS). However, no control condition was tested and stimulation blocks lasted only 1 minute. We set out to replicate the TS results and to test whether tic improvement occurs by the proposed cortical entrainment mechanism. Thirty-two people with TS, age 15-64, completed two study visits with repeated MNS on and off blocks in random order, one visit for rhythmic and one for arrhythmic MNS. Subjects and staff were blind to order; a video rater was additionally blind to stimulation and to order of visits and blocks. Rhythmic MNS at 10 Hz improved tics. Both rhythmic and arrhythmic 12 Hz MNS improved tic frequency, intensity and urges without significant difference. Participant masking was effective and there was no carryover effect. Several participants described dramatic benefit. Discomfort was minimal. MNS benefit did not persist after the end of stimulation. These results replicate the tic benefit from MNS, but show that the EEG entrainment hypothesis cannot explain that benefit. Another electrophysiological mechanism may explain benefit; alternatively, these data do not exclude a placebo effect. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory 2023-02-06 /pmc/articles/PMC9915823/ /pubmed/36778375 http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/2023.02.01.23285304 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which allows reusers to distribute, remix, adapt, and build upon the material in any medium or format, so long as attribution is given to the creator. The license allows for commercial use. |
spellingShingle | Article Iverson, Ann M. Arbuckle, Amanda L. Ueda, Keisuke Song, David Y. Bihun, Emily C. Koller, Jonathan M. Wallendorf, Michael Black, Kevin J. Peripheral nerve induction of inhibitory brain circuits to treat Tourette syndrome: A randomized crossover trial |
title | Peripheral nerve induction of inhibitory brain circuits to treat Tourette syndrome: A randomized crossover trial |
title_full | Peripheral nerve induction of inhibitory brain circuits to treat Tourette syndrome: A randomized crossover trial |
title_fullStr | Peripheral nerve induction of inhibitory brain circuits to treat Tourette syndrome: A randomized crossover trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Peripheral nerve induction of inhibitory brain circuits to treat Tourette syndrome: A randomized crossover trial |
title_short | Peripheral nerve induction of inhibitory brain circuits to treat Tourette syndrome: A randomized crossover trial |
title_sort | peripheral nerve induction of inhibitory brain circuits to treat tourette syndrome: a randomized crossover trial |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9915823/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36778375 http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/2023.02.01.23285304 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT iversonannm peripheralnerveinductionofinhibitorybraincircuitstotreattourettesyndromearandomizedcrossovertrial AT arbuckleamandal peripheralnerveinductionofinhibitorybraincircuitstotreattourettesyndromearandomizedcrossovertrial AT uedakeisuke peripheralnerveinductionofinhibitorybraincircuitstotreattourettesyndromearandomizedcrossovertrial AT songdavidy peripheralnerveinductionofinhibitorybraincircuitstotreattourettesyndromearandomizedcrossovertrial AT bihunemilyc peripheralnerveinductionofinhibitorybraincircuitstotreattourettesyndromearandomizedcrossovertrial AT kollerjonathanm peripheralnerveinductionofinhibitorybraincircuitstotreattourettesyndromearandomizedcrossovertrial AT wallendorfmichael peripheralnerveinductionofinhibitorybraincircuitstotreattourettesyndromearandomizedcrossovertrial AT blackkevinj peripheralnerveinductionofinhibitorybraincircuitstotreattourettesyndromearandomizedcrossovertrial |