Cargando…

Availability of evidence and comparative effectiveness for surgical versus drug interventions: an overview of systematic reviews

OBJECTIVES. To examine the prevalence of comparisons of surgery to drug regimens, the strength of evidence of such comparisons, and whether surgery or the drug intervention was favored. DESIGN. Systematic review of systematic reviews (umbrella review) DATA SOURCES. Cochrane Database of Systematic Re...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zavalis, Emmanuel A., Rameau, Anaïs, Saraswathula, Anirudh, Vist, Joachim, Schuit, Ewoud, Ioannidis, John P. A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9915830/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36778340
http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/2023.01.30.23285207
_version_ 1784885981236690944
author Zavalis, Emmanuel A.
Rameau, Anaïs
Saraswathula, Anirudh
Vist, Joachim
Schuit, Ewoud
Ioannidis, John P. A.
author_facet Zavalis, Emmanuel A.
Rameau, Anaïs
Saraswathula, Anirudh
Vist, Joachim
Schuit, Ewoud
Ioannidis, John P. A.
author_sort Zavalis, Emmanuel A.
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES. To examine the prevalence of comparisons of surgery to drug regimens, the strength of evidence of such comparisons, and whether surgery or the drug intervention was favored. DESIGN. Systematic review of systematic reviews (umbrella review) DATA SOURCES. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (CDSR) ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA AND SYNTHESIS OF RESULTS. Using the search term “surg*” in CDSR, we retrieved systematic reviews of surgical interventions. Abstracts were subsequently screened to find systematic reviews that aimed to compare surgical to drug interventions; and then, among them, those that included any randomized controlled trials (RCTs) for such comparisons. Trial results data were extracted manually and synthesized into random-effects meta-analyses. RESULTS. Overall, 188 systematic reviews intended to compare surgery versus drugs. Only 41 included data from at least one RCT (total, 165 RCTs with data) and covered a total of 103 different outcomes of various comparisons of surgery versus drugs. A GRADE assessment was performed by the Cochrane reviewers for 87 (83%) outcomes in the reviews, indicating the strength of evidence was high in 4 outcomes (4%), moderate in 22 (21%), low in 27 (26%) and very low in 33 (32%). Based on 95% confidence intervals, the surgical intervention was favored in 38/103 (37%), and the drugs were favored in 13/103 (13%) outcomes. Of the outcomes with high GRADE rating, only one showed conclusive superiority (sphincterotomy was better than medical therapy for anal fissure). Of the 22 outcomes with moderate GRADE rating, 6 (27%) were inconclusive, 14 (64%) were in favor of surgery, and 2 (9%) were in favor of drugs. CONCLUSIONS. Though the relative merits of surgical versus drug interventions are important to know for many diseases, high strength randomized evidence is rare. More randomized trials comparing surgery to drug interventions are needed. PROTOCOL REGISTRATION. https://osf.io/p9x3j
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9915830
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-99158302023-02-11 Availability of evidence and comparative effectiveness for surgical versus drug interventions: an overview of systematic reviews Zavalis, Emmanuel A. Rameau, Anaïs Saraswathula, Anirudh Vist, Joachim Schuit, Ewoud Ioannidis, John P. A. medRxiv Article OBJECTIVES. To examine the prevalence of comparisons of surgery to drug regimens, the strength of evidence of such comparisons, and whether surgery or the drug intervention was favored. DESIGN. Systematic review of systematic reviews (umbrella review) DATA SOURCES. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (CDSR) ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA AND SYNTHESIS OF RESULTS. Using the search term “surg*” in CDSR, we retrieved systematic reviews of surgical interventions. Abstracts were subsequently screened to find systematic reviews that aimed to compare surgical to drug interventions; and then, among them, those that included any randomized controlled trials (RCTs) for such comparisons. Trial results data were extracted manually and synthesized into random-effects meta-analyses. RESULTS. Overall, 188 systematic reviews intended to compare surgery versus drugs. Only 41 included data from at least one RCT (total, 165 RCTs with data) and covered a total of 103 different outcomes of various comparisons of surgery versus drugs. A GRADE assessment was performed by the Cochrane reviewers for 87 (83%) outcomes in the reviews, indicating the strength of evidence was high in 4 outcomes (4%), moderate in 22 (21%), low in 27 (26%) and very low in 33 (32%). Based on 95% confidence intervals, the surgical intervention was favored in 38/103 (37%), and the drugs were favored in 13/103 (13%) outcomes. Of the outcomes with high GRADE rating, only one showed conclusive superiority (sphincterotomy was better than medical therapy for anal fissure). Of the 22 outcomes with moderate GRADE rating, 6 (27%) were inconclusive, 14 (64%) were in favor of surgery, and 2 (9%) were in favor of drugs. CONCLUSIONS. Though the relative merits of surgical versus drug interventions are important to know for many diseases, high strength randomized evidence is rare. More randomized trials comparing surgery to drug interventions are needed. PROTOCOL REGISTRATION. https://osf.io/p9x3j Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory 2023-02-01 /pmc/articles/PMC9915830/ /pubmed/36778340 http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/2023.01.30.23285207 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) , which allows reusers to distribute, remix, adapt, and build upon the material in any medium or format for noncommercial purposes only, and only so long as attribution is given to the creator.
spellingShingle Article
Zavalis, Emmanuel A.
Rameau, Anaïs
Saraswathula, Anirudh
Vist, Joachim
Schuit, Ewoud
Ioannidis, John P. A.
Availability of evidence and comparative effectiveness for surgical versus drug interventions: an overview of systematic reviews
title Availability of evidence and comparative effectiveness for surgical versus drug interventions: an overview of systematic reviews
title_full Availability of evidence and comparative effectiveness for surgical versus drug interventions: an overview of systematic reviews
title_fullStr Availability of evidence and comparative effectiveness for surgical versus drug interventions: an overview of systematic reviews
title_full_unstemmed Availability of evidence and comparative effectiveness for surgical versus drug interventions: an overview of systematic reviews
title_short Availability of evidence and comparative effectiveness for surgical versus drug interventions: an overview of systematic reviews
title_sort availability of evidence and comparative effectiveness for surgical versus drug interventions: an overview of systematic reviews
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9915830/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36778340
http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/2023.01.30.23285207
work_keys_str_mv AT zavalisemmanuela availabilityofevidenceandcomparativeeffectivenessforsurgicalversusdruginterventionsanoverviewofsystematicreviews
AT rameauanais availabilityofevidenceandcomparativeeffectivenessforsurgicalversusdruginterventionsanoverviewofsystematicreviews
AT saraswathulaanirudh availabilityofevidenceandcomparativeeffectivenessforsurgicalversusdruginterventionsanoverviewofsystematicreviews
AT vistjoachim availabilityofevidenceandcomparativeeffectivenessforsurgicalversusdruginterventionsanoverviewofsystematicreviews
AT schuitewoud availabilityofevidenceandcomparativeeffectivenessforsurgicalversusdruginterventionsanoverviewofsystematicreviews
AT ioannidisjohnpa availabilityofevidenceandcomparativeeffectivenessforsurgicalversusdruginterventionsanoverviewofsystematicreviews