Cargando…

COLUMBUS 5-Year Update: A Randomized, Open-Label, Phase III Trial of Encorafenib Plus Binimetinib Versus Vemurafenib or Encorafenib in Patients With BRAF V600–Mutant Melanoma

Combination treatment with BRAF and MEK inhibitors has demonstrated benefits on progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) and is a standard of care for the treatment of advanced BRAF V600–mutant melanoma. Here, we report the 5-year update from the COLUMBUS trial (ClinicalTrials.gov i...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dummer, Reinhard, Flaherty, Keith T., Robert, Caroline, Arance, Ana, de Groot, Jan Willem B., Garbe, Claus, Gogas, Helen J., Gutzmer, Ralf, Krajsová, Ivana, Liszkay, Gabriella, Loquai, Carmen, Mandalà, Mario, Schadendorf, Dirk, Yamazaki, Naoya, di Pietro, Alessandra, Cantey-Kiser, Jean, Edwards, Michelle, Ascierto, Paolo A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer Health 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9916040/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35862871
http://dx.doi.org/10.1200/JCO.21.02659
_version_ 1784886030966456320
author Dummer, Reinhard
Flaherty, Keith T.
Robert, Caroline
Arance, Ana
de Groot, Jan Willem B.
Garbe, Claus
Gogas, Helen J.
Gutzmer, Ralf
Krajsová, Ivana
Liszkay, Gabriella
Loquai, Carmen
Mandalà, Mario
Schadendorf, Dirk
Yamazaki, Naoya
di Pietro, Alessandra
Cantey-Kiser, Jean
Edwards, Michelle
Ascierto, Paolo A.
author_facet Dummer, Reinhard
Flaherty, Keith T.
Robert, Caroline
Arance, Ana
de Groot, Jan Willem B.
Garbe, Claus
Gogas, Helen J.
Gutzmer, Ralf
Krajsová, Ivana
Liszkay, Gabriella
Loquai, Carmen
Mandalà, Mario
Schadendorf, Dirk
Yamazaki, Naoya
di Pietro, Alessandra
Cantey-Kiser, Jean
Edwards, Michelle
Ascierto, Paolo A.
author_sort Dummer, Reinhard
collection PubMed
description Combination treatment with BRAF and MEK inhibitors has demonstrated benefits on progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) and is a standard of care for the treatment of advanced BRAF V600–mutant melanoma. Here, we report the 5-year update from the COLUMBUS trial (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01909453). METHODS: Patients with locally advanced unresectable or metastatic BRAF V600–mutant melanoma, untreated or progressed after first-line immunotherapy, were randomly assigned 1:1:1 to encorafenib 450 mg once daily plus binimetinib 45 mg twice daily, vemurafenib 960 mg twice daily, or encorafenib 300 mg once daily. An updated analysis was conducted 65 months after the last patient was randomly assigned. RESULTS: Five hundred seventy-seven patients were randomly assigned: 192 to encorafenib plus binimetinib, 191 to vemurafenib, and 194 to encorafenib. The 5-year PFS and OS rates with encorafenib plus binimetinib were 23% and 35% overall and 31% and 45% in those with normal lactate dehydrogenase levels, respectively. In comparison, the 5-year PFS and OS rates with vemurafenib were 10% and 21% overall and 12% and 28% in those with normal lactate dehydrogenase levels, respectively. The median duration of response with encorafenib plus binimetinib was 18.6 months, with disease control achieved in 92.2% of patients. In comparison, the median duration of response with vemurafenib was 12.3 months, with disease control achieved in 81.2% of patients. Long-term follow-up showed no new safety concerns, and results were consistent with the known tolerability profile of encorafenib plus binimetinib. Interactive visualization of the data presented in this article is available at COLUMBUS dashboard. CONCLUSION: In this 5-year update of part 1 of the COLUMBUS trial, encorafenib plus binimetinib treatment demonstrated continued long-term benefits and a consistent safety profile in patients with BRAF V600–mutant melanoma.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9916040
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Wolters Kluwer Health
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-99160402023-02-13 COLUMBUS 5-Year Update: A Randomized, Open-Label, Phase III Trial of Encorafenib Plus Binimetinib Versus Vemurafenib or Encorafenib in Patients With BRAF V600–Mutant Melanoma Dummer, Reinhard Flaherty, Keith T. Robert, Caroline Arance, Ana de Groot, Jan Willem B. Garbe, Claus Gogas, Helen J. Gutzmer, Ralf Krajsová, Ivana Liszkay, Gabriella Loquai, Carmen Mandalà, Mario Schadendorf, Dirk Yamazaki, Naoya di Pietro, Alessandra Cantey-Kiser, Jean Edwards, Michelle Ascierto, Paolo A. J Clin Oncol ORIGINAL REPORTS Combination treatment with BRAF and MEK inhibitors has demonstrated benefits on progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) and is a standard of care for the treatment of advanced BRAF V600–mutant melanoma. Here, we report the 5-year update from the COLUMBUS trial (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01909453). METHODS: Patients with locally advanced unresectable or metastatic BRAF V600–mutant melanoma, untreated or progressed after first-line immunotherapy, were randomly assigned 1:1:1 to encorafenib 450 mg once daily plus binimetinib 45 mg twice daily, vemurafenib 960 mg twice daily, or encorafenib 300 mg once daily. An updated analysis was conducted 65 months after the last patient was randomly assigned. RESULTS: Five hundred seventy-seven patients were randomly assigned: 192 to encorafenib plus binimetinib, 191 to vemurafenib, and 194 to encorafenib. The 5-year PFS and OS rates with encorafenib plus binimetinib were 23% and 35% overall and 31% and 45% in those with normal lactate dehydrogenase levels, respectively. In comparison, the 5-year PFS and OS rates with vemurafenib were 10% and 21% overall and 12% and 28% in those with normal lactate dehydrogenase levels, respectively. The median duration of response with encorafenib plus binimetinib was 18.6 months, with disease control achieved in 92.2% of patients. In comparison, the median duration of response with vemurafenib was 12.3 months, with disease control achieved in 81.2% of patients. Long-term follow-up showed no new safety concerns, and results were consistent with the known tolerability profile of encorafenib plus binimetinib. Interactive visualization of the data presented in this article is available at COLUMBUS dashboard. CONCLUSION: In this 5-year update of part 1 of the COLUMBUS trial, encorafenib plus binimetinib treatment demonstrated continued long-term benefits and a consistent safety profile in patients with BRAF V600–mutant melanoma. Wolters Kluwer Health 2022-12-20 2022-07-21 /pmc/articles/PMC9916040/ /pubmed/35862871 http://dx.doi.org/10.1200/JCO.21.02659 Text en © 2022 by American Society of Clinical Oncology https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives 4.0 License: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
spellingShingle ORIGINAL REPORTS
Dummer, Reinhard
Flaherty, Keith T.
Robert, Caroline
Arance, Ana
de Groot, Jan Willem B.
Garbe, Claus
Gogas, Helen J.
Gutzmer, Ralf
Krajsová, Ivana
Liszkay, Gabriella
Loquai, Carmen
Mandalà, Mario
Schadendorf, Dirk
Yamazaki, Naoya
di Pietro, Alessandra
Cantey-Kiser, Jean
Edwards, Michelle
Ascierto, Paolo A.
COLUMBUS 5-Year Update: A Randomized, Open-Label, Phase III Trial of Encorafenib Plus Binimetinib Versus Vemurafenib or Encorafenib in Patients With BRAF V600–Mutant Melanoma
title COLUMBUS 5-Year Update: A Randomized, Open-Label, Phase III Trial of Encorafenib Plus Binimetinib Versus Vemurafenib or Encorafenib in Patients With BRAF V600–Mutant Melanoma
title_full COLUMBUS 5-Year Update: A Randomized, Open-Label, Phase III Trial of Encorafenib Plus Binimetinib Versus Vemurafenib or Encorafenib in Patients With BRAF V600–Mutant Melanoma
title_fullStr COLUMBUS 5-Year Update: A Randomized, Open-Label, Phase III Trial of Encorafenib Plus Binimetinib Versus Vemurafenib or Encorafenib in Patients With BRAF V600–Mutant Melanoma
title_full_unstemmed COLUMBUS 5-Year Update: A Randomized, Open-Label, Phase III Trial of Encorafenib Plus Binimetinib Versus Vemurafenib or Encorafenib in Patients With BRAF V600–Mutant Melanoma
title_short COLUMBUS 5-Year Update: A Randomized, Open-Label, Phase III Trial of Encorafenib Plus Binimetinib Versus Vemurafenib or Encorafenib in Patients With BRAF V600–Mutant Melanoma
title_sort columbus 5-year update: a randomized, open-label, phase iii trial of encorafenib plus binimetinib versus vemurafenib or encorafenib in patients with braf v600–mutant melanoma
topic ORIGINAL REPORTS
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9916040/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35862871
http://dx.doi.org/10.1200/JCO.21.02659
work_keys_str_mv AT dummerreinhard columbus5yearupdatearandomizedopenlabelphaseiiitrialofencorafenibplusbinimetinibversusvemurafeniborencorafenibinpatientswithbrafv600mutantmelanoma
AT flahertykeitht columbus5yearupdatearandomizedopenlabelphaseiiitrialofencorafenibplusbinimetinibversusvemurafeniborencorafenibinpatientswithbrafv600mutantmelanoma
AT robertcaroline columbus5yearupdatearandomizedopenlabelphaseiiitrialofencorafenibplusbinimetinibversusvemurafeniborencorafenibinpatientswithbrafv600mutantmelanoma
AT aranceana columbus5yearupdatearandomizedopenlabelphaseiiitrialofencorafenibplusbinimetinibversusvemurafeniborencorafenibinpatientswithbrafv600mutantmelanoma
AT degrootjanwillemb columbus5yearupdatearandomizedopenlabelphaseiiitrialofencorafenibplusbinimetinibversusvemurafeniborencorafenibinpatientswithbrafv600mutantmelanoma
AT garbeclaus columbus5yearupdatearandomizedopenlabelphaseiiitrialofencorafenibplusbinimetinibversusvemurafeniborencorafenibinpatientswithbrafv600mutantmelanoma
AT gogashelenj columbus5yearupdatearandomizedopenlabelphaseiiitrialofencorafenibplusbinimetinibversusvemurafeniborencorafenibinpatientswithbrafv600mutantmelanoma
AT gutzmerralf columbus5yearupdatearandomizedopenlabelphaseiiitrialofencorafenibplusbinimetinibversusvemurafeniborencorafenibinpatientswithbrafv600mutantmelanoma
AT krajsovaivana columbus5yearupdatearandomizedopenlabelphaseiiitrialofencorafenibplusbinimetinibversusvemurafeniborencorafenibinpatientswithbrafv600mutantmelanoma
AT liszkaygabriella columbus5yearupdatearandomizedopenlabelphaseiiitrialofencorafenibplusbinimetinibversusvemurafeniborencorafenibinpatientswithbrafv600mutantmelanoma
AT loquaicarmen columbus5yearupdatearandomizedopenlabelphaseiiitrialofencorafenibplusbinimetinibversusvemurafeniborencorafenibinpatientswithbrafv600mutantmelanoma
AT mandalamario columbus5yearupdatearandomizedopenlabelphaseiiitrialofencorafenibplusbinimetinibversusvemurafeniborencorafenibinpatientswithbrafv600mutantmelanoma
AT schadendorfdirk columbus5yearupdatearandomizedopenlabelphaseiiitrialofencorafenibplusbinimetinibversusvemurafeniborencorafenibinpatientswithbrafv600mutantmelanoma
AT yamazakinaoya columbus5yearupdatearandomizedopenlabelphaseiiitrialofencorafenibplusbinimetinibversusvemurafeniborencorafenibinpatientswithbrafv600mutantmelanoma
AT dipietroalessandra columbus5yearupdatearandomizedopenlabelphaseiiitrialofencorafenibplusbinimetinibversusvemurafeniborencorafenibinpatientswithbrafv600mutantmelanoma
AT canteykiserjean columbus5yearupdatearandomizedopenlabelphaseiiitrialofencorafenibplusbinimetinibversusvemurafeniborencorafenibinpatientswithbrafv600mutantmelanoma
AT edwardsmichelle columbus5yearupdatearandomizedopenlabelphaseiiitrialofencorafenibplusbinimetinibversusvemurafeniborencorafenibinpatientswithbrafv600mutantmelanoma
AT asciertopaoloa columbus5yearupdatearandomizedopenlabelphaseiiitrialofencorafenibplusbinimetinibversusvemurafeniborencorafenibinpatientswithbrafv600mutantmelanoma