Cargando…
COLUMBUS 5-Year Update: A Randomized, Open-Label, Phase III Trial of Encorafenib Plus Binimetinib Versus Vemurafenib or Encorafenib in Patients With BRAF V600–Mutant Melanoma
Combination treatment with BRAF and MEK inhibitors has demonstrated benefits on progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) and is a standard of care for the treatment of advanced BRAF V600–mutant melanoma. Here, we report the 5-year update from the COLUMBUS trial (ClinicalTrials.gov i...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Wolters Kluwer Health
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9916040/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35862871 http://dx.doi.org/10.1200/JCO.21.02659 |
_version_ | 1784886030966456320 |
---|---|
author | Dummer, Reinhard Flaherty, Keith T. Robert, Caroline Arance, Ana de Groot, Jan Willem B. Garbe, Claus Gogas, Helen J. Gutzmer, Ralf Krajsová, Ivana Liszkay, Gabriella Loquai, Carmen Mandalà, Mario Schadendorf, Dirk Yamazaki, Naoya di Pietro, Alessandra Cantey-Kiser, Jean Edwards, Michelle Ascierto, Paolo A. |
author_facet | Dummer, Reinhard Flaherty, Keith T. Robert, Caroline Arance, Ana de Groot, Jan Willem B. Garbe, Claus Gogas, Helen J. Gutzmer, Ralf Krajsová, Ivana Liszkay, Gabriella Loquai, Carmen Mandalà, Mario Schadendorf, Dirk Yamazaki, Naoya di Pietro, Alessandra Cantey-Kiser, Jean Edwards, Michelle Ascierto, Paolo A. |
author_sort | Dummer, Reinhard |
collection | PubMed |
description | Combination treatment with BRAF and MEK inhibitors has demonstrated benefits on progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) and is a standard of care for the treatment of advanced BRAF V600–mutant melanoma. Here, we report the 5-year update from the COLUMBUS trial (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01909453). METHODS: Patients with locally advanced unresectable or metastatic BRAF V600–mutant melanoma, untreated or progressed after first-line immunotherapy, were randomly assigned 1:1:1 to encorafenib 450 mg once daily plus binimetinib 45 mg twice daily, vemurafenib 960 mg twice daily, or encorafenib 300 mg once daily. An updated analysis was conducted 65 months after the last patient was randomly assigned. RESULTS: Five hundred seventy-seven patients were randomly assigned: 192 to encorafenib plus binimetinib, 191 to vemurafenib, and 194 to encorafenib. The 5-year PFS and OS rates with encorafenib plus binimetinib were 23% and 35% overall and 31% and 45% in those with normal lactate dehydrogenase levels, respectively. In comparison, the 5-year PFS and OS rates with vemurafenib were 10% and 21% overall and 12% and 28% in those with normal lactate dehydrogenase levels, respectively. The median duration of response with encorafenib plus binimetinib was 18.6 months, with disease control achieved in 92.2% of patients. In comparison, the median duration of response with vemurafenib was 12.3 months, with disease control achieved in 81.2% of patients. Long-term follow-up showed no new safety concerns, and results were consistent with the known tolerability profile of encorafenib plus binimetinib. Interactive visualization of the data presented in this article is available at COLUMBUS dashboard. CONCLUSION: In this 5-year update of part 1 of the COLUMBUS trial, encorafenib plus binimetinib treatment demonstrated continued long-term benefits and a consistent safety profile in patients with BRAF V600–mutant melanoma. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9916040 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Wolters Kluwer Health |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-99160402023-02-13 COLUMBUS 5-Year Update: A Randomized, Open-Label, Phase III Trial of Encorafenib Plus Binimetinib Versus Vemurafenib or Encorafenib in Patients With BRAF V600–Mutant Melanoma Dummer, Reinhard Flaherty, Keith T. Robert, Caroline Arance, Ana de Groot, Jan Willem B. Garbe, Claus Gogas, Helen J. Gutzmer, Ralf Krajsová, Ivana Liszkay, Gabriella Loquai, Carmen Mandalà, Mario Schadendorf, Dirk Yamazaki, Naoya di Pietro, Alessandra Cantey-Kiser, Jean Edwards, Michelle Ascierto, Paolo A. J Clin Oncol ORIGINAL REPORTS Combination treatment with BRAF and MEK inhibitors has demonstrated benefits on progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) and is a standard of care for the treatment of advanced BRAF V600–mutant melanoma. Here, we report the 5-year update from the COLUMBUS trial (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01909453). METHODS: Patients with locally advanced unresectable or metastatic BRAF V600–mutant melanoma, untreated or progressed after first-line immunotherapy, were randomly assigned 1:1:1 to encorafenib 450 mg once daily plus binimetinib 45 mg twice daily, vemurafenib 960 mg twice daily, or encorafenib 300 mg once daily. An updated analysis was conducted 65 months after the last patient was randomly assigned. RESULTS: Five hundred seventy-seven patients were randomly assigned: 192 to encorafenib plus binimetinib, 191 to vemurafenib, and 194 to encorafenib. The 5-year PFS and OS rates with encorafenib plus binimetinib were 23% and 35% overall and 31% and 45% in those with normal lactate dehydrogenase levels, respectively. In comparison, the 5-year PFS and OS rates with vemurafenib were 10% and 21% overall and 12% and 28% in those with normal lactate dehydrogenase levels, respectively. The median duration of response with encorafenib plus binimetinib was 18.6 months, with disease control achieved in 92.2% of patients. In comparison, the median duration of response with vemurafenib was 12.3 months, with disease control achieved in 81.2% of patients. Long-term follow-up showed no new safety concerns, and results were consistent with the known tolerability profile of encorafenib plus binimetinib. Interactive visualization of the data presented in this article is available at COLUMBUS dashboard. CONCLUSION: In this 5-year update of part 1 of the COLUMBUS trial, encorafenib plus binimetinib treatment demonstrated continued long-term benefits and a consistent safety profile in patients with BRAF V600–mutant melanoma. Wolters Kluwer Health 2022-12-20 2022-07-21 /pmc/articles/PMC9916040/ /pubmed/35862871 http://dx.doi.org/10.1200/JCO.21.02659 Text en © 2022 by American Society of Clinical Oncology https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives 4.0 License: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ |
spellingShingle | ORIGINAL REPORTS Dummer, Reinhard Flaherty, Keith T. Robert, Caroline Arance, Ana de Groot, Jan Willem B. Garbe, Claus Gogas, Helen J. Gutzmer, Ralf Krajsová, Ivana Liszkay, Gabriella Loquai, Carmen Mandalà, Mario Schadendorf, Dirk Yamazaki, Naoya di Pietro, Alessandra Cantey-Kiser, Jean Edwards, Michelle Ascierto, Paolo A. COLUMBUS 5-Year Update: A Randomized, Open-Label, Phase III Trial of Encorafenib Plus Binimetinib Versus Vemurafenib or Encorafenib in Patients With BRAF V600–Mutant Melanoma |
title | COLUMBUS 5-Year Update: A Randomized, Open-Label, Phase III Trial of Encorafenib Plus Binimetinib Versus Vemurafenib or Encorafenib in Patients With BRAF V600–Mutant Melanoma |
title_full | COLUMBUS 5-Year Update: A Randomized, Open-Label, Phase III Trial of Encorafenib Plus Binimetinib Versus Vemurafenib or Encorafenib in Patients With BRAF V600–Mutant Melanoma |
title_fullStr | COLUMBUS 5-Year Update: A Randomized, Open-Label, Phase III Trial of Encorafenib Plus Binimetinib Versus Vemurafenib or Encorafenib in Patients With BRAF V600–Mutant Melanoma |
title_full_unstemmed | COLUMBUS 5-Year Update: A Randomized, Open-Label, Phase III Trial of Encorafenib Plus Binimetinib Versus Vemurafenib or Encorafenib in Patients With BRAF V600–Mutant Melanoma |
title_short | COLUMBUS 5-Year Update: A Randomized, Open-Label, Phase III Trial of Encorafenib Plus Binimetinib Versus Vemurafenib or Encorafenib in Patients With BRAF V600–Mutant Melanoma |
title_sort | columbus 5-year update: a randomized, open-label, phase iii trial of encorafenib plus binimetinib versus vemurafenib or encorafenib in patients with braf v600–mutant melanoma |
topic | ORIGINAL REPORTS |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9916040/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35862871 http://dx.doi.org/10.1200/JCO.21.02659 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT dummerreinhard columbus5yearupdatearandomizedopenlabelphaseiiitrialofencorafenibplusbinimetinibversusvemurafeniborencorafenibinpatientswithbrafv600mutantmelanoma AT flahertykeitht columbus5yearupdatearandomizedopenlabelphaseiiitrialofencorafenibplusbinimetinibversusvemurafeniborencorafenibinpatientswithbrafv600mutantmelanoma AT robertcaroline columbus5yearupdatearandomizedopenlabelphaseiiitrialofencorafenibplusbinimetinibversusvemurafeniborencorafenibinpatientswithbrafv600mutantmelanoma AT aranceana columbus5yearupdatearandomizedopenlabelphaseiiitrialofencorafenibplusbinimetinibversusvemurafeniborencorafenibinpatientswithbrafv600mutantmelanoma AT degrootjanwillemb columbus5yearupdatearandomizedopenlabelphaseiiitrialofencorafenibplusbinimetinibversusvemurafeniborencorafenibinpatientswithbrafv600mutantmelanoma AT garbeclaus columbus5yearupdatearandomizedopenlabelphaseiiitrialofencorafenibplusbinimetinibversusvemurafeniborencorafenibinpatientswithbrafv600mutantmelanoma AT gogashelenj columbus5yearupdatearandomizedopenlabelphaseiiitrialofencorafenibplusbinimetinibversusvemurafeniborencorafenibinpatientswithbrafv600mutantmelanoma AT gutzmerralf columbus5yearupdatearandomizedopenlabelphaseiiitrialofencorafenibplusbinimetinibversusvemurafeniborencorafenibinpatientswithbrafv600mutantmelanoma AT krajsovaivana columbus5yearupdatearandomizedopenlabelphaseiiitrialofencorafenibplusbinimetinibversusvemurafeniborencorafenibinpatientswithbrafv600mutantmelanoma AT liszkaygabriella columbus5yearupdatearandomizedopenlabelphaseiiitrialofencorafenibplusbinimetinibversusvemurafeniborencorafenibinpatientswithbrafv600mutantmelanoma AT loquaicarmen columbus5yearupdatearandomizedopenlabelphaseiiitrialofencorafenibplusbinimetinibversusvemurafeniborencorafenibinpatientswithbrafv600mutantmelanoma AT mandalamario columbus5yearupdatearandomizedopenlabelphaseiiitrialofencorafenibplusbinimetinibversusvemurafeniborencorafenibinpatientswithbrafv600mutantmelanoma AT schadendorfdirk columbus5yearupdatearandomizedopenlabelphaseiiitrialofencorafenibplusbinimetinibversusvemurafeniborencorafenibinpatientswithbrafv600mutantmelanoma AT yamazakinaoya columbus5yearupdatearandomizedopenlabelphaseiiitrialofencorafenibplusbinimetinibversusvemurafeniborencorafenibinpatientswithbrafv600mutantmelanoma AT dipietroalessandra columbus5yearupdatearandomizedopenlabelphaseiiitrialofencorafenibplusbinimetinibversusvemurafeniborencorafenibinpatientswithbrafv600mutantmelanoma AT canteykiserjean columbus5yearupdatearandomizedopenlabelphaseiiitrialofencorafenibplusbinimetinibversusvemurafeniborencorafenibinpatientswithbrafv600mutantmelanoma AT edwardsmichelle columbus5yearupdatearandomizedopenlabelphaseiiitrialofencorafenibplusbinimetinibversusvemurafeniborencorafenibinpatientswithbrafv600mutantmelanoma AT asciertopaoloa columbus5yearupdatearandomizedopenlabelphaseiiitrialofencorafenibplusbinimetinibversusvemurafeniborencorafenibinpatientswithbrafv600mutantmelanoma |