Endothelial Cell Markers Are Inferior to Vascular Smooth Muscle Cells Markers in Staining Vasa Vasorum and Are Non-Specific for Distinct Endothelial Cell Lineages in Clinical Samples

Current techniques for the detection of vasa vasorum (VV) in vascular pathology include staining for endothelial cell (EC) markers such as CD31 or VE-cadherin. However, this approach does not permit an objective assessment of vascular geometry upon vasospasm and the clinical relevance of endothelial specification markers found in developmental biology studies remains unclear. Here, we performed a combined immunostaining of rat abdominal aorta (rAA) and human saphenous vein (hSV) for various EC or vascular smooth muscle cell (VSMC) markers and found that the latter (e.g., alpha smooth muscle actin (α-SMA) or smooth muscle myosin heavy chain (SM-MHC)) ensure a several-fold higher signal-to-noise ratio irrespective of the primary antibody origin, fluorophore, or VV type (arterioles, venules, or capillaries). Further, α-SMA or SM-MHC staining allowed unbiased evaluation of the VV area under vasospasm. Screening of the molecular markers of endothelial heterogeneity (mechanosensitive transcription factors KLF2 and KLF4, arterial transcription factors HES1, HEY1, and ERG, venous transcription factor NR2F2, and venous/lymphatic markers PROX1, LYVE1, VEGFR3, and NRP2) have not revealed specific markers of any lineage in hSV (although KLF2 and PROX1 were restricted to venous endothelium in rAA), suggesting the need in high-throughput searches for the clinically relevant signatures of arterial, venous, lymphatic, or capillary differentiation.