Cargando…
Numerical Assessment Tool to Measure Realism in Clinical Simulation
Realism is indispensable in clinical simulation learning, and the objective of this work is to present to the scientific community the methodology behind a novel numerical and digital tool to objectively measure realism in clinical simulation. Indicators measuring accuracy and naturality constitute...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9916353/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36767618 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20032247 |
_version_ | 1784886104925667328 |
---|---|
author | Coro-Montanet, Gleyvis Pardo Monedero, María Jesús Sánchez Ituarte, Julia Wagner Porto Rocha, Helena Gomar Sancho, Carmen |
author_facet | Coro-Montanet, Gleyvis Pardo Monedero, María Jesús Sánchez Ituarte, Julia Wagner Porto Rocha, Helena Gomar Sancho, Carmen |
author_sort | Coro-Montanet, Gleyvis |
collection | PubMed |
description | Realism is indispensable in clinical simulation learning, and the objective of this work is to present to the scientific community the methodology behind a novel numerical and digital tool to objectively measure realism in clinical simulation. Indicators measuring accuracy and naturality constitute ProRealSim v.1.0 (Universidad Europea, Madrid, Spain) which allows the assessing of attained realism for three dimensions: simulated participant, scenography, and simulator. Twelve experts in simulation-based learning (SBL) analyzed the conceptual relevance of 73 initial qualitative indicators that were then reduced to 53 final indicators after a screening study evaluating eight medical clinical simulation scenarios. Inter- and intra-observer concordance, correlation, and internal consistency were calculated, and an exploratory factorial analysis was conducted. Realism units were weighted based on variability and its mathematical contribution to global and dimensional realism. A statistical significance of p < 0.05 was applied and internal consistency was significant in all cases (raw_alpha ≥ 0.9698094). ProRealSim v.1.0 is integrated into a bilingual, free, and open access digital platform, and the intention is to foster a culture of interpretation of realism for its better study and didactic use. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9916353 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-99163532023-02-11 Numerical Assessment Tool to Measure Realism in Clinical Simulation Coro-Montanet, Gleyvis Pardo Monedero, María Jesús Sánchez Ituarte, Julia Wagner Porto Rocha, Helena Gomar Sancho, Carmen Int J Environ Res Public Health Article Realism is indispensable in clinical simulation learning, and the objective of this work is to present to the scientific community the methodology behind a novel numerical and digital tool to objectively measure realism in clinical simulation. Indicators measuring accuracy and naturality constitute ProRealSim v.1.0 (Universidad Europea, Madrid, Spain) which allows the assessing of attained realism for three dimensions: simulated participant, scenography, and simulator. Twelve experts in simulation-based learning (SBL) analyzed the conceptual relevance of 73 initial qualitative indicators that were then reduced to 53 final indicators after a screening study evaluating eight medical clinical simulation scenarios. Inter- and intra-observer concordance, correlation, and internal consistency were calculated, and an exploratory factorial analysis was conducted. Realism units were weighted based on variability and its mathematical contribution to global and dimensional realism. A statistical significance of p < 0.05 was applied and internal consistency was significant in all cases (raw_alpha ≥ 0.9698094). ProRealSim v.1.0 is integrated into a bilingual, free, and open access digital platform, and the intention is to foster a culture of interpretation of realism for its better study and didactic use. MDPI 2023-01-27 /pmc/articles/PMC9916353/ /pubmed/36767618 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20032247 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Coro-Montanet, Gleyvis Pardo Monedero, María Jesús Sánchez Ituarte, Julia Wagner Porto Rocha, Helena Gomar Sancho, Carmen Numerical Assessment Tool to Measure Realism in Clinical Simulation |
title | Numerical Assessment Tool to Measure Realism in Clinical Simulation |
title_full | Numerical Assessment Tool to Measure Realism in Clinical Simulation |
title_fullStr | Numerical Assessment Tool to Measure Realism in Clinical Simulation |
title_full_unstemmed | Numerical Assessment Tool to Measure Realism in Clinical Simulation |
title_short | Numerical Assessment Tool to Measure Realism in Clinical Simulation |
title_sort | numerical assessment tool to measure realism in clinical simulation |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9916353/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36767618 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20032247 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT coromontanetgleyvis numericalassessmenttooltomeasurerealisminclinicalsimulation AT pardomonederomariajesus numericalassessmenttooltomeasurerealisminclinicalsimulation AT sanchezituartejulia numericalassessmenttooltomeasurerealisminclinicalsimulation AT wagnerportorochahelena numericalassessmenttooltomeasurerealisminclinicalsimulation AT gomarsanchocarmen numericalassessmenttooltomeasurerealisminclinicalsimulation |