Cargando…

Environmental, Human and Ecotoxicological Impacts of Different Rice Cultivation Systems in Northern Thailand

Sustainable practices in rice cultivation require effective farming management concerning environmental and human health impacts. In this study, three rice cultivation systems, namely low-land, upland, and terraced rice in the Mae Chaem District, Chiang Mai Province, were assessed and the carbon foo...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Toolkiattiwong, Patharanun, Arunrat, Noppol, Sereenonchai, Sukanya
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9916391/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36768102
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20032738
_version_ 1784886114510700544
author Toolkiattiwong, Patharanun
Arunrat, Noppol
Sereenonchai, Sukanya
author_facet Toolkiattiwong, Patharanun
Arunrat, Noppol
Sereenonchai, Sukanya
author_sort Toolkiattiwong, Patharanun
collection PubMed
description Sustainable practices in rice cultivation require effective farming management concerning environmental and human health impacts. In this study, three rice cultivation systems, namely low-land, upland, and terraced rice in the Mae Chaem District, Chiang Mai Province, were assessed and the carbon footprint (CF), water footprint (WF), and human and ecotoxicological impacts were compared from pesticide application. The results showed that the highest CF intensity was observed in terraced rice with 1.15 kg CO(2)eq kg(−1) rice yield, followed by lowland rice (1.02 kg CO(2)eq kg(−1) rice yield) and upland rice (0.17 kg CO(2)eq kg(−1) rice yield) fields. Moreover, lowland rice cultivation generated the highest total WF with 1701.6 m(3) ton(−1), followed by terraced rice (1422.1 m(3) ton(−1)) and upland rice (1283.2 m(3) ton(−1)). The lowland rice fields had the most impact on human health and freshwater ecotoxicity, followed by the terraced and upland rice cultivation systems. The results also showed that most of the pesticides remaining in soils were chlorpyrifos (98.88%), butachlor (96.94%), and fipronil (95.33%), respectively. The substances with the greatest distributions in freshwater were acephate (56.74%), glyphosate (50.90%), and metaldehyde (45.65%), respectively. This study indicated that, with more agricultural inputs, higher CF, WF, human health impacts, and freshwater ecotoxicity were generated. Although the use of pesticides in the study areas did not exceed the recommendations on the packaging, glyphosate and chlorpyrifos are restricted in Thailand, so it is necessary to monitor their use due to their long-term health effects.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9916391
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-99163912023-02-11 Environmental, Human and Ecotoxicological Impacts of Different Rice Cultivation Systems in Northern Thailand Toolkiattiwong, Patharanun Arunrat, Noppol Sereenonchai, Sukanya Int J Environ Res Public Health Article Sustainable practices in rice cultivation require effective farming management concerning environmental and human health impacts. In this study, three rice cultivation systems, namely low-land, upland, and terraced rice in the Mae Chaem District, Chiang Mai Province, were assessed and the carbon footprint (CF), water footprint (WF), and human and ecotoxicological impacts were compared from pesticide application. The results showed that the highest CF intensity was observed in terraced rice with 1.15 kg CO(2)eq kg(−1) rice yield, followed by lowland rice (1.02 kg CO(2)eq kg(−1) rice yield) and upland rice (0.17 kg CO(2)eq kg(−1) rice yield) fields. Moreover, lowland rice cultivation generated the highest total WF with 1701.6 m(3) ton(−1), followed by terraced rice (1422.1 m(3) ton(−1)) and upland rice (1283.2 m(3) ton(−1)). The lowland rice fields had the most impact on human health and freshwater ecotoxicity, followed by the terraced and upland rice cultivation systems. The results also showed that most of the pesticides remaining in soils were chlorpyrifos (98.88%), butachlor (96.94%), and fipronil (95.33%), respectively. The substances with the greatest distributions in freshwater were acephate (56.74%), glyphosate (50.90%), and metaldehyde (45.65%), respectively. This study indicated that, with more agricultural inputs, higher CF, WF, human health impacts, and freshwater ecotoxicity were generated. Although the use of pesticides in the study areas did not exceed the recommendations on the packaging, glyphosate and chlorpyrifos are restricted in Thailand, so it is necessary to monitor their use due to their long-term health effects. MDPI 2023-02-03 /pmc/articles/PMC9916391/ /pubmed/36768102 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20032738 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Toolkiattiwong, Patharanun
Arunrat, Noppol
Sereenonchai, Sukanya
Environmental, Human and Ecotoxicological Impacts of Different Rice Cultivation Systems in Northern Thailand
title Environmental, Human and Ecotoxicological Impacts of Different Rice Cultivation Systems in Northern Thailand
title_full Environmental, Human and Ecotoxicological Impacts of Different Rice Cultivation Systems in Northern Thailand
title_fullStr Environmental, Human and Ecotoxicological Impacts of Different Rice Cultivation Systems in Northern Thailand
title_full_unstemmed Environmental, Human and Ecotoxicological Impacts of Different Rice Cultivation Systems in Northern Thailand
title_short Environmental, Human and Ecotoxicological Impacts of Different Rice Cultivation Systems in Northern Thailand
title_sort environmental, human and ecotoxicological impacts of different rice cultivation systems in northern thailand
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9916391/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36768102
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20032738
work_keys_str_mv AT toolkiattiwongpatharanun environmentalhumanandecotoxicologicalimpactsofdifferentricecultivationsystemsinnorthernthailand
AT arunratnoppol environmentalhumanandecotoxicologicalimpactsofdifferentricecultivationsystemsinnorthernthailand
AT sereenonchaisukanya environmentalhumanandecotoxicologicalimpactsofdifferentricecultivationsystemsinnorthernthailand