Cargando…
Validity and reliability of the left ventricular assist device self-care behaviour scale
BACKGROUND: Adequate self-care behaviour is essential for patients with a left ventricular assist device (LVAD) to prevent complications, prolong life, and optimise quality of life. However, there were no valid and reliable measurements available to assess self-care behaviour among patients with LVA...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9917258/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36763631 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0275465 |
_version_ | 1784886327726047232 |
---|---|
author | Kato, Naoko P. Melnikov, Semyon Denfeld, Quin E. Casida, Jesus Strömberg, Anna Ben-Gal, Tuvia Lee, Christopher S. Jaarsma, Tiny |
author_facet | Kato, Naoko P. Melnikov, Semyon Denfeld, Quin E. Casida, Jesus Strömberg, Anna Ben-Gal, Tuvia Lee, Christopher S. Jaarsma, Tiny |
author_sort | Kato, Naoko P. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Adequate self-care behaviour is essential for patients with a left ventricular assist device (LVAD) to prevent complications, prolong life, and optimise quality of life. However, there were no valid and reliable measurements available to assess self-care behaviour among patients with LVAD. We have previously developed the 33-item LVAD self-care behaviour scale. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate psychometric properties of the 33-item LVAD self-care behaviour scale. METHODS AND RESULTS: Data on 127 patients with a LVAD in Israel, Japan, and the USA were analysed (mean age 51±14.3, 81% male). Exploratory factor analysis extracted three factors, and 13 items were excluded from the scale. Internal consistency assessed by Cronbach’s alpha was acceptable for the total scale (α = 0.80) and the three subscales: Factor 1: Monitoring (α = 0.81), Factor 2: Heart failure self-care (α = 0.67), and Factor 3: LVAD self-care (α = 0.63). The 20-item version of the LVAD self-care behaviour scale had sufficient convergent validity with another scale that assessed self-care related to the driveline of LVAD (r = 0.47, p<0.001). Test–retest reliability was adequate (intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.58). CONCLUSIONS: The 20-item version of the LVAD self-care behaviour scale showed adequate validity and reliability. The scale is ready for use in clinical practice and research. Additional testing might further optimise the scale. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9917258 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-99172582023-02-11 Validity and reliability of the left ventricular assist device self-care behaviour scale Kato, Naoko P. Melnikov, Semyon Denfeld, Quin E. Casida, Jesus Strömberg, Anna Ben-Gal, Tuvia Lee, Christopher S. Jaarsma, Tiny PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: Adequate self-care behaviour is essential for patients with a left ventricular assist device (LVAD) to prevent complications, prolong life, and optimise quality of life. However, there were no valid and reliable measurements available to assess self-care behaviour among patients with LVAD. We have previously developed the 33-item LVAD self-care behaviour scale. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate psychometric properties of the 33-item LVAD self-care behaviour scale. METHODS AND RESULTS: Data on 127 patients with a LVAD in Israel, Japan, and the USA were analysed (mean age 51±14.3, 81% male). Exploratory factor analysis extracted three factors, and 13 items were excluded from the scale. Internal consistency assessed by Cronbach’s alpha was acceptable for the total scale (α = 0.80) and the three subscales: Factor 1: Monitoring (α = 0.81), Factor 2: Heart failure self-care (α = 0.67), and Factor 3: LVAD self-care (α = 0.63). The 20-item version of the LVAD self-care behaviour scale had sufficient convergent validity with another scale that assessed self-care related to the driveline of LVAD (r = 0.47, p<0.001). Test–retest reliability was adequate (intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.58). CONCLUSIONS: The 20-item version of the LVAD self-care behaviour scale showed adequate validity and reliability. The scale is ready for use in clinical practice and research. Additional testing might further optimise the scale. Public Library of Science 2023-02-10 /pmc/articles/PMC9917258/ /pubmed/36763631 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0275465 Text en © 2023 Kato et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Kato, Naoko P. Melnikov, Semyon Denfeld, Quin E. Casida, Jesus Strömberg, Anna Ben-Gal, Tuvia Lee, Christopher S. Jaarsma, Tiny Validity and reliability of the left ventricular assist device self-care behaviour scale |
title | Validity and reliability of the left ventricular assist device self-care behaviour scale |
title_full | Validity and reliability of the left ventricular assist device self-care behaviour scale |
title_fullStr | Validity and reliability of the left ventricular assist device self-care behaviour scale |
title_full_unstemmed | Validity and reliability of the left ventricular assist device self-care behaviour scale |
title_short | Validity and reliability of the left ventricular assist device self-care behaviour scale |
title_sort | validity and reliability of the left ventricular assist device self-care behaviour scale |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9917258/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36763631 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0275465 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT katonaokop validityandreliabilityoftheleftventricularassistdeviceselfcarebehaviourscale AT melnikovsemyon validityandreliabilityoftheleftventricularassistdeviceselfcarebehaviourscale AT denfeldquine validityandreliabilityoftheleftventricularassistdeviceselfcarebehaviourscale AT casidajesus validityandreliabilityoftheleftventricularassistdeviceselfcarebehaviourscale AT stromberganna validityandreliabilityoftheleftventricularassistdeviceselfcarebehaviourscale AT bengaltuvia validityandreliabilityoftheleftventricularassistdeviceselfcarebehaviourscale AT leechristophers validityandreliabilityoftheleftventricularassistdeviceselfcarebehaviourscale AT jaarsmatiny validityandreliabilityoftheleftventricularassistdeviceselfcarebehaviourscale |