Cargando…

Validity and reliability of the left ventricular assist device self-care behaviour scale

BACKGROUND: Adequate self-care behaviour is essential for patients with a left ventricular assist device (LVAD) to prevent complications, prolong life, and optimise quality of life. However, there were no valid and reliable measurements available to assess self-care behaviour among patients with LVA...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kato, Naoko P., Melnikov, Semyon, Denfeld, Quin E., Casida, Jesus, Strömberg, Anna, Ben-Gal, Tuvia, Lee, Christopher S., Jaarsma, Tiny
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9917258/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36763631
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0275465
_version_ 1784886327726047232
author Kato, Naoko P.
Melnikov, Semyon
Denfeld, Quin E.
Casida, Jesus
Strömberg, Anna
Ben-Gal, Tuvia
Lee, Christopher S.
Jaarsma, Tiny
author_facet Kato, Naoko P.
Melnikov, Semyon
Denfeld, Quin E.
Casida, Jesus
Strömberg, Anna
Ben-Gal, Tuvia
Lee, Christopher S.
Jaarsma, Tiny
author_sort Kato, Naoko P.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Adequate self-care behaviour is essential for patients with a left ventricular assist device (LVAD) to prevent complications, prolong life, and optimise quality of life. However, there were no valid and reliable measurements available to assess self-care behaviour among patients with LVAD. We have previously developed the 33-item LVAD self-care behaviour scale. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate psychometric properties of the 33-item LVAD self-care behaviour scale. METHODS AND RESULTS: Data on 127 patients with a LVAD in Israel, Japan, and the USA were analysed (mean age 51±14.3, 81% male). Exploratory factor analysis extracted three factors, and 13 items were excluded from the scale. Internal consistency assessed by Cronbach’s alpha was acceptable for the total scale (α = 0.80) and the three subscales: Factor 1: Monitoring (α = 0.81), Factor 2: Heart failure self-care (α = 0.67), and Factor 3: LVAD self-care (α = 0.63). The 20-item version of the LVAD self-care behaviour scale had sufficient convergent validity with another scale that assessed self-care related to the driveline of LVAD (r = 0.47, p<0.001). Test–retest reliability was adequate (intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.58). CONCLUSIONS: The 20-item version of the LVAD self-care behaviour scale showed adequate validity and reliability. The scale is ready for use in clinical practice and research. Additional testing might further optimise the scale.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9917258
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-99172582023-02-11 Validity and reliability of the left ventricular assist device self-care behaviour scale Kato, Naoko P. Melnikov, Semyon Denfeld, Quin E. Casida, Jesus Strömberg, Anna Ben-Gal, Tuvia Lee, Christopher S. Jaarsma, Tiny PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: Adequate self-care behaviour is essential for patients with a left ventricular assist device (LVAD) to prevent complications, prolong life, and optimise quality of life. However, there were no valid and reliable measurements available to assess self-care behaviour among patients with LVAD. We have previously developed the 33-item LVAD self-care behaviour scale. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate psychometric properties of the 33-item LVAD self-care behaviour scale. METHODS AND RESULTS: Data on 127 patients with a LVAD in Israel, Japan, and the USA were analysed (mean age 51±14.3, 81% male). Exploratory factor analysis extracted three factors, and 13 items were excluded from the scale. Internal consistency assessed by Cronbach’s alpha was acceptable for the total scale (α = 0.80) and the three subscales: Factor 1: Monitoring (α = 0.81), Factor 2: Heart failure self-care (α = 0.67), and Factor 3: LVAD self-care (α = 0.63). The 20-item version of the LVAD self-care behaviour scale had sufficient convergent validity with another scale that assessed self-care related to the driveline of LVAD (r = 0.47, p<0.001). Test–retest reliability was adequate (intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.58). CONCLUSIONS: The 20-item version of the LVAD self-care behaviour scale showed adequate validity and reliability. The scale is ready for use in clinical practice and research. Additional testing might further optimise the scale. Public Library of Science 2023-02-10 /pmc/articles/PMC9917258/ /pubmed/36763631 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0275465 Text en © 2023 Kato et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Kato, Naoko P.
Melnikov, Semyon
Denfeld, Quin E.
Casida, Jesus
Strömberg, Anna
Ben-Gal, Tuvia
Lee, Christopher S.
Jaarsma, Tiny
Validity and reliability of the left ventricular assist device self-care behaviour scale
title Validity and reliability of the left ventricular assist device self-care behaviour scale
title_full Validity and reliability of the left ventricular assist device self-care behaviour scale
title_fullStr Validity and reliability of the left ventricular assist device self-care behaviour scale
title_full_unstemmed Validity and reliability of the left ventricular assist device self-care behaviour scale
title_short Validity and reliability of the left ventricular assist device self-care behaviour scale
title_sort validity and reliability of the left ventricular assist device self-care behaviour scale
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9917258/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36763631
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0275465
work_keys_str_mv AT katonaokop validityandreliabilityoftheleftventricularassistdeviceselfcarebehaviourscale
AT melnikovsemyon validityandreliabilityoftheleftventricularassistdeviceselfcarebehaviourscale
AT denfeldquine validityandreliabilityoftheleftventricularassistdeviceselfcarebehaviourscale
AT casidajesus validityandreliabilityoftheleftventricularassistdeviceselfcarebehaviourscale
AT stromberganna validityandreliabilityoftheleftventricularassistdeviceselfcarebehaviourscale
AT bengaltuvia validityandreliabilityoftheleftventricularassistdeviceselfcarebehaviourscale
AT leechristophers validityandreliabilityoftheleftventricularassistdeviceselfcarebehaviourscale
AT jaarsmatiny validityandreliabilityoftheleftventricularassistdeviceselfcarebehaviourscale