Cargando…

Serum Myostatin among Excessive Drinkers

Myostatin acts as a negative regulator of muscle growth. Its effect on fat mass is subject to debate. Among alcoholics, there is a high prevalence of muscle atrophy, and increased fat deposition has been also described in these patients. Myostatin could be involved in these alterations, but its rela...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Martín-González, Candelaria, Pérez-Hernández, Onán, García-Rodríguez, Alen, Abreu-González, Pedro, Ortega-Toledo, Paula, Fernández-Rodríguez, Camino María, Alvisa-Negrín, Julio César, Martínez-Riera, Antonio, González-Reimers, Emilio
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9917382/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36769301
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms24032981
Descripción
Sumario:Myostatin acts as a negative regulator of muscle growth. Its effect on fat mass is subject to debate. Among alcoholics, there is a high prevalence of muscle atrophy, and increased fat deposition has been also described in these patients. Myostatin could be involved in these alterations, but its relationships with body composition have been scarcely studied in alcoholic patients. To analyze the behavior of myostatin among alcoholics and its relationship with alcohol intake, liver function, and body composition. We investigated serum myostatin in 59 male patients and 18 controls. Patients were all heavy drinkers admitted with organic complications related to excessive ethanol ingestion. Densitometry analysis was used to assess body composition in 46 patients. Handgrip was assessed in 51 patients. Patients showed lower myostatin values than controls (Z = 3.80; p < 0.001). There was a significant relationship between myostatin and fat at the right leg (ρ = 0.32; p = 0.028), left leg (ρ = 0.32; p = 0.028), trunk (ρ = 0.31, p = 0.038), total fat proport ion (ρ = 0.33, p = 0.026), and gynecoid fat distribution (ρ = 0.40, p = 0.006) but not with lean mass (total lean ρ = 0.07; p = 0.63; trunk lean ρ = 0.03; p = 0.85; lower limbs ρ = 0.08; p = 0.58; upper limbs ρ = 0.04 p = 0.82; android ρ = 0.02; p = 0.88, or gynoid lean mass ρ = 0.20; p = 0.19). In total, 80.43% of patients showed at least one criterion of osteosarcopenic adiposity (OSA). Myostatin was related to OSA obesity. We also observed higher myostatin values among patients with body mass index > 30 kg/m(2). Serum myostatin was lower among excessive drinkers, and it was related to increased fat deposition among these patients but not to lean mass, handgrip, or bone mineral density.