Cargando…

Pulsed Electric Field Ablation of Esophageal Malignancies and Mitigating Damage to Smooth Muscle: An In Vitro Study

Cancer ablation therapies aim to be efficient while minimizing damage to healthy tissues. Nanosecond pulsed electric field (nsPEF) is a promising ablation modality because of its selectivity against certain cell types and reduced neuromuscular effects. We compared cell killing efficiency by PEF (100...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gudvangen, Emily, Mangalanathan, Uma, Semenov, Iurii, Kiester, Allen S., Keppler, Mark A., Ibey, Bennett L., Bixler, Joel N., Pakhomov, Andrei G.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9917603/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36769172
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms24032854
_version_ 1784886407152533504
author Gudvangen, Emily
Mangalanathan, Uma
Semenov, Iurii
Kiester, Allen S.
Keppler, Mark A.
Ibey, Bennett L.
Bixler, Joel N.
Pakhomov, Andrei G.
author_facet Gudvangen, Emily
Mangalanathan, Uma
Semenov, Iurii
Kiester, Allen S.
Keppler, Mark A.
Ibey, Bennett L.
Bixler, Joel N.
Pakhomov, Andrei G.
author_sort Gudvangen, Emily
collection PubMed
description Cancer ablation therapies aim to be efficient while minimizing damage to healthy tissues. Nanosecond pulsed electric field (nsPEF) is a promising ablation modality because of its selectivity against certain cell types and reduced neuromuscular effects. We compared cell killing efficiency by PEF (100 pulses, 200 ns–10 µs duration, 10 Hz) in a panel of human esophageal cells (normal and pre-malignant epithelial and smooth muscle). Normal epithelial cells were less sensitive than the pre-malignant ones to unipolar PEF (15–20% higher LD50, p < 0.05). Smooth muscle cells (SMC) oriented randomly in the electric field were more sensitive, with 30–40% lower LD50 (p < 0.01). Trains of ten, 300-ns pulses at 10 kV/cm caused twofold weaker electroporative uptake of YO-PRO-1 dye in normal epithelial cells than in either pre-malignant cells or in SMC oriented perpendicularly to the field. Aligning SMC with the field reduced the dye uptake fourfold, along with a twofold reduction in Ca(2+) transients. A 300-ns pulse induced a twofold smaller transmembrane potential in cells aligned with the field, making them less vulnerable to electroporation. We infer that damage to SMC from nsPEF ablation of esophageal malignancies can be minimized by applying the electric field parallel to the predominant SMC orientation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9917603
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-99176032023-02-11 Pulsed Electric Field Ablation of Esophageal Malignancies and Mitigating Damage to Smooth Muscle: An In Vitro Study Gudvangen, Emily Mangalanathan, Uma Semenov, Iurii Kiester, Allen S. Keppler, Mark A. Ibey, Bennett L. Bixler, Joel N. Pakhomov, Andrei G. Int J Mol Sci Article Cancer ablation therapies aim to be efficient while minimizing damage to healthy tissues. Nanosecond pulsed electric field (nsPEF) is a promising ablation modality because of its selectivity against certain cell types and reduced neuromuscular effects. We compared cell killing efficiency by PEF (100 pulses, 200 ns–10 µs duration, 10 Hz) in a panel of human esophageal cells (normal and pre-malignant epithelial and smooth muscle). Normal epithelial cells were less sensitive than the pre-malignant ones to unipolar PEF (15–20% higher LD50, p < 0.05). Smooth muscle cells (SMC) oriented randomly in the electric field were more sensitive, with 30–40% lower LD50 (p < 0.01). Trains of ten, 300-ns pulses at 10 kV/cm caused twofold weaker electroporative uptake of YO-PRO-1 dye in normal epithelial cells than in either pre-malignant cells or in SMC oriented perpendicularly to the field. Aligning SMC with the field reduced the dye uptake fourfold, along with a twofold reduction in Ca(2+) transients. A 300-ns pulse induced a twofold smaller transmembrane potential in cells aligned with the field, making them less vulnerable to electroporation. We infer that damage to SMC from nsPEF ablation of esophageal malignancies can be minimized by applying the electric field parallel to the predominant SMC orientation. MDPI 2023-02-02 /pmc/articles/PMC9917603/ /pubmed/36769172 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms24032854 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Gudvangen, Emily
Mangalanathan, Uma
Semenov, Iurii
Kiester, Allen S.
Keppler, Mark A.
Ibey, Bennett L.
Bixler, Joel N.
Pakhomov, Andrei G.
Pulsed Electric Field Ablation of Esophageal Malignancies and Mitigating Damage to Smooth Muscle: An In Vitro Study
title Pulsed Electric Field Ablation of Esophageal Malignancies and Mitigating Damage to Smooth Muscle: An In Vitro Study
title_full Pulsed Electric Field Ablation of Esophageal Malignancies and Mitigating Damage to Smooth Muscle: An In Vitro Study
title_fullStr Pulsed Electric Field Ablation of Esophageal Malignancies and Mitigating Damage to Smooth Muscle: An In Vitro Study
title_full_unstemmed Pulsed Electric Field Ablation of Esophageal Malignancies and Mitigating Damage to Smooth Muscle: An In Vitro Study
title_short Pulsed Electric Field Ablation of Esophageal Malignancies and Mitigating Damage to Smooth Muscle: An In Vitro Study
title_sort pulsed electric field ablation of esophageal malignancies and mitigating damage to smooth muscle: an in vitro study
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9917603/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36769172
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms24032854
work_keys_str_mv AT gudvangenemily pulsedelectricfieldablationofesophagealmalignanciesandmitigatingdamagetosmoothmuscleaninvitrostudy
AT mangalanathanuma pulsedelectricfieldablationofesophagealmalignanciesandmitigatingdamagetosmoothmuscleaninvitrostudy
AT semenoviurii pulsedelectricfieldablationofesophagealmalignanciesandmitigatingdamagetosmoothmuscleaninvitrostudy
AT kiesterallens pulsedelectricfieldablationofesophagealmalignanciesandmitigatingdamagetosmoothmuscleaninvitrostudy
AT kepplermarka pulsedelectricfieldablationofesophagealmalignanciesandmitigatingdamagetosmoothmuscleaninvitrostudy
AT ibeybennettl pulsedelectricfieldablationofesophagealmalignanciesandmitigatingdamagetosmoothmuscleaninvitrostudy
AT bixlerjoeln pulsedelectricfieldablationofesophagealmalignanciesandmitigatingdamagetosmoothmuscleaninvitrostudy
AT pakhomovandreig pulsedelectricfieldablationofesophagealmalignanciesandmitigatingdamagetosmoothmuscleaninvitrostudy