Cargando…

Surface Topography Description after Turning Inconel 718 with a Conventional, Wiper and Special Insert Made by the SPS Technique

This paper presents a comparison of surface morphology obtained after machining Inconel 718 by the conventional insert, by Wiper insert and by using the cutting insert made by Spark Plasma Sintering (SPS). The shape of the special insert was obtained by employing Wire Electrical Discharge Machining...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Szablewski, Piotr, Legutko, Stanisław, Mróz, Adrian, Garbiec, Dariusz, Czajka, Rafał, Smak, Krzysztof, Krawczyk, Bartłomiej
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9917646/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36769960
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma16030949
_version_ 1784886417798725632
author Szablewski, Piotr
Legutko, Stanisław
Mróz, Adrian
Garbiec, Dariusz
Czajka, Rafał
Smak, Krzysztof
Krawczyk, Bartłomiej
author_facet Szablewski, Piotr
Legutko, Stanisław
Mróz, Adrian
Garbiec, Dariusz
Czajka, Rafał
Smak, Krzysztof
Krawczyk, Bartłomiej
author_sort Szablewski, Piotr
collection PubMed
description This paper presents a comparison of surface morphology obtained after machining Inconel 718 by the conventional insert, by Wiper insert and by using the cutting insert made by Spark Plasma Sintering (SPS). The shape of the special insert was obtained by employing Wire Electrical Discharge Machining (WEDM). The paper focuses on the description of surface topography after turning in dry and wet conditions. The performed investigation included longitudinal turning tests of Inconel 718 performed in a range of variable feeds. Surface topography measurements have been performed with the application of Nanoscan 855. The performed analysis includes a parametric evaluation of the obtained surfaces. With the Wiper insert, the Sa surface roughness parameter was obtained below 0.6 µm in the whole range of used feed rates. The surface roughness parameter Sa measured on the surface after machining by special insert depends on the cutting conditions (wet and dry machining). After, the dry machining parameter Sa, similar to the Wiper insert, was below 0.6 µm in the whole range of used feed rates. Unfortunately, cutting Inconel 718 using special insert with feed rate f = 0.25 mm/rev and cooling generated a surface with Sa parameter over 2 times higher than for the same feed rate without cooling, while this parameter, after turning by conventional insert, increases over 4 times using feed rate f = 0.25 mm/rev compared to feed rate f = 0.05 mm/rev during machining with cooling. This ratio is lower for conventional insert in dry machining because of sticking, which arises at the smallest feed rate according to previous research.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9917646
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-99176462023-02-11 Surface Topography Description after Turning Inconel 718 with a Conventional, Wiper and Special Insert Made by the SPS Technique Szablewski, Piotr Legutko, Stanisław Mróz, Adrian Garbiec, Dariusz Czajka, Rafał Smak, Krzysztof Krawczyk, Bartłomiej Materials (Basel) Article This paper presents a comparison of surface morphology obtained after machining Inconel 718 by the conventional insert, by Wiper insert and by using the cutting insert made by Spark Plasma Sintering (SPS). The shape of the special insert was obtained by employing Wire Electrical Discharge Machining (WEDM). The paper focuses on the description of surface topography after turning in dry and wet conditions. The performed investigation included longitudinal turning tests of Inconel 718 performed in a range of variable feeds. Surface topography measurements have been performed with the application of Nanoscan 855. The performed analysis includes a parametric evaluation of the obtained surfaces. With the Wiper insert, the Sa surface roughness parameter was obtained below 0.6 µm in the whole range of used feed rates. The surface roughness parameter Sa measured on the surface after machining by special insert depends on the cutting conditions (wet and dry machining). After, the dry machining parameter Sa, similar to the Wiper insert, was below 0.6 µm in the whole range of used feed rates. Unfortunately, cutting Inconel 718 using special insert with feed rate f = 0.25 mm/rev and cooling generated a surface with Sa parameter over 2 times higher than for the same feed rate without cooling, while this parameter, after turning by conventional insert, increases over 4 times using feed rate f = 0.25 mm/rev compared to feed rate f = 0.05 mm/rev during machining with cooling. This ratio is lower for conventional insert in dry machining because of sticking, which arises at the smallest feed rate according to previous research. MDPI 2023-01-19 /pmc/articles/PMC9917646/ /pubmed/36769960 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma16030949 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Szablewski, Piotr
Legutko, Stanisław
Mróz, Adrian
Garbiec, Dariusz
Czajka, Rafał
Smak, Krzysztof
Krawczyk, Bartłomiej
Surface Topography Description after Turning Inconel 718 with a Conventional, Wiper and Special Insert Made by the SPS Technique
title Surface Topography Description after Turning Inconel 718 with a Conventional, Wiper and Special Insert Made by the SPS Technique
title_full Surface Topography Description after Turning Inconel 718 with a Conventional, Wiper and Special Insert Made by the SPS Technique
title_fullStr Surface Topography Description after Turning Inconel 718 with a Conventional, Wiper and Special Insert Made by the SPS Technique
title_full_unstemmed Surface Topography Description after Turning Inconel 718 with a Conventional, Wiper and Special Insert Made by the SPS Technique
title_short Surface Topography Description after Turning Inconel 718 with a Conventional, Wiper and Special Insert Made by the SPS Technique
title_sort surface topography description after turning inconel 718 with a conventional, wiper and special insert made by the sps technique
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9917646/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36769960
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma16030949
work_keys_str_mv AT szablewskipiotr surfacetopographydescriptionafterturninginconel718withaconventionalwiperandspecialinsertmadebythespstechnique
AT legutkostanisław surfacetopographydescriptionafterturninginconel718withaconventionalwiperandspecialinsertmadebythespstechnique
AT mrozadrian surfacetopographydescriptionafterturninginconel718withaconventionalwiperandspecialinsertmadebythespstechnique
AT garbiecdariusz surfacetopographydescriptionafterturninginconel718withaconventionalwiperandspecialinsertmadebythespstechnique
AT czajkarafał surfacetopographydescriptionafterturninginconel718withaconventionalwiperandspecialinsertmadebythespstechnique
AT smakkrzysztof surfacetopographydescriptionafterturninginconel718withaconventionalwiperandspecialinsertmadebythespstechnique
AT krawczykbartłomiej surfacetopographydescriptionafterturninginconel718withaconventionalwiperandspecialinsertmadebythespstechnique