Exposure to airborne SARS-CoV-2 in four hospital wards and ICUs of Cyprus. A detailed study accounting for day-to-day operations and aerosol generating procedures

In any infectious disease, understanding the modes of transmission is key to selecting effective public health measures. In the case of COVID-19 spread, the strictness of the imposed measures outlined the lack of understanding on how SARS-CoV-2 transmits, particularly via airborne pathways. With the aim to characterize the transmission dynamics of airborne SARS-CoV-2, 165 and 62 air and environmental samples, respectively, were collected in four COVID-19 wards and ICUs in Cyprus and analyzed by RT-PCR. An alternative method for SARS-CoV-2 detection in air that provides comparable results but is less cumbersome and time demanding, is also proposed. Considering that all clinics employed 14 regenerations per hour of full fresh air inside patient rooms, it was hypothesized that the viral levels and the frequency of positive samples would be minimum outside of the rooms. However, it is shown that leaving the door opened in patient rooms hinders the efficiency of the ventilation system applied, allowing the virus to escape. As a result, the highest observed viral levels (135 copies m(−3)) were observed in the corridor of a ward and the frequency of positive samples in the same area was comparable to that inside a two-bed cohort. SARS-CoV-2 in that corridor was found primarily to lie in the coarse mode, at sizes between 1.8 and 10 μm. Similar to previous studies, the frequency of positive samples and viral levels were the lowest inside intensive care units. However, if a patient with sufficient viral load (Ct-value 31) underwent aerosol generating procedures, positive samples with viral levels below 45 copies m(−3) were acquired within a 2 m distance of the patient. Our results suggest that a robust ventilation system can prevent unnecessary exposure to SARS-CoV-2 but with limitations related to foot traffic or the operations taking place at the time.