Cargando…

Improvement of Water and Nitrogen Use Efficiencies by Alternative Cropping Systems Based on a Model Approach

The conventional double cropping system of winter wheat and summer maize (WW-SUM) in the North China Plain (NCP) consumes a large amount of water and chemical fertilizer, threatening the sustainable development of agriculture in this region. This study was based on a three-year field experiment of d...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Han, Le, Li, Yunrui, Hou, Yonghao, Liang, Hao, Feng, Puyu, Hu, Kelin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9919017/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36771681
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/plants12030597
_version_ 1784886719772884992
author Han, Le
Li, Yunrui
Hou, Yonghao
Liang, Hao
Feng, Puyu
Hu, Kelin
author_facet Han, Le
Li, Yunrui
Hou, Yonghao
Liang, Hao
Feng, Puyu
Hu, Kelin
author_sort Han, Le
collection PubMed
description The conventional double cropping system of winter wheat and summer maize (WW-SUM) in the North China Plain (NCP) consumes a large amount of water and chemical fertilizer, threatening the sustainable development of agriculture in this region. This study was based on a three-year field experiment of different cropping systems (2H1Y—two harvests in one year; 3H2Y—three harvests in two years; and 1H1Y—one harvest in one year). The 2H1Y system had three irrigation–fertilization practices (FP—farmer’s practice; RI—reduced input; and WQ—Wuqiao pattern in Wuqiao County, Hebei Province). A soil–crop system model (WHCNS—soil water heat carbon nitrogen simulator) was used to quantify the effects of different cropping systems on water and nitrogen use efficiencies (WUE and NUE, respectively), and to explore the trade-offs between crop yields and environmental impacts. The results showed that annual yield, water consumption, and the WUE of 2H1Y were higher than those of the 3H2Y and 1H1Y systems. However, local precipitation during the period of crop growth could only meet 65%, 76%, and 91% of total water consumption for the 2H1Y, 3H2Y and 1H1Y systems, respectively. Nearly 65% of irrigation water (groundwater) was used in the period of wheat growth that contributed to almost 40% of the annual yield. Among the three patterns of the 2H1Y system, the order of the WUE was 2H1Y_RI > 2H1Y_WQ > 2H1Y_FP. Compared to 2H1Y_FP, the total fertilizer N application rates in 2H1Y_WQ, 2H1Y_RI, and 3H2Y were reduced by 25%, 65%, and 74%, respectively. The 3H2Y system had the highest NUE of 34.3 kg kg(−1), 54% greater than the 2H1Y_FP system (22.2 kg kg(−1)). Moreover, the 3H2Y system obviously reduced nitrate leaching and gaseous N loss when compared with the other two systems. The order of total N loss of different cropping systems was 2H1Y (261 kg N ha(−1)) > 1H1Y (78 kg N ha(−1)) > 3H2Y (70 kg N ha(−1)). Considering the agronomic and environmental effects as well as economic benefits, the 3H2Y cropping system with optimal irrigation and fertilization would be a promising cropping system in the NCP that could achieve the balance between crop yield and the sustainable use of groundwater and N fertilizer.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9919017
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-99190172023-02-12 Improvement of Water and Nitrogen Use Efficiencies by Alternative Cropping Systems Based on a Model Approach Han, Le Li, Yunrui Hou, Yonghao Liang, Hao Feng, Puyu Hu, Kelin Plants (Basel) Article The conventional double cropping system of winter wheat and summer maize (WW-SUM) in the North China Plain (NCP) consumes a large amount of water and chemical fertilizer, threatening the sustainable development of agriculture in this region. This study was based on a three-year field experiment of different cropping systems (2H1Y—two harvests in one year; 3H2Y—three harvests in two years; and 1H1Y—one harvest in one year). The 2H1Y system had three irrigation–fertilization practices (FP—farmer’s practice; RI—reduced input; and WQ—Wuqiao pattern in Wuqiao County, Hebei Province). A soil–crop system model (WHCNS—soil water heat carbon nitrogen simulator) was used to quantify the effects of different cropping systems on water and nitrogen use efficiencies (WUE and NUE, respectively), and to explore the trade-offs between crop yields and environmental impacts. The results showed that annual yield, water consumption, and the WUE of 2H1Y were higher than those of the 3H2Y and 1H1Y systems. However, local precipitation during the period of crop growth could only meet 65%, 76%, and 91% of total water consumption for the 2H1Y, 3H2Y and 1H1Y systems, respectively. Nearly 65% of irrigation water (groundwater) was used in the period of wheat growth that contributed to almost 40% of the annual yield. Among the three patterns of the 2H1Y system, the order of the WUE was 2H1Y_RI > 2H1Y_WQ > 2H1Y_FP. Compared to 2H1Y_FP, the total fertilizer N application rates in 2H1Y_WQ, 2H1Y_RI, and 3H2Y were reduced by 25%, 65%, and 74%, respectively. The 3H2Y system had the highest NUE of 34.3 kg kg(−1), 54% greater than the 2H1Y_FP system (22.2 kg kg(−1)). Moreover, the 3H2Y system obviously reduced nitrate leaching and gaseous N loss when compared with the other two systems. The order of total N loss of different cropping systems was 2H1Y (261 kg N ha(−1)) > 1H1Y (78 kg N ha(−1)) > 3H2Y (70 kg N ha(−1)). Considering the agronomic and environmental effects as well as economic benefits, the 3H2Y cropping system with optimal irrigation and fertilization would be a promising cropping system in the NCP that could achieve the balance between crop yield and the sustainable use of groundwater and N fertilizer. MDPI 2023-01-29 /pmc/articles/PMC9919017/ /pubmed/36771681 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/plants12030597 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Han, Le
Li, Yunrui
Hou, Yonghao
Liang, Hao
Feng, Puyu
Hu, Kelin
Improvement of Water and Nitrogen Use Efficiencies by Alternative Cropping Systems Based on a Model Approach
title Improvement of Water and Nitrogen Use Efficiencies by Alternative Cropping Systems Based on a Model Approach
title_full Improvement of Water and Nitrogen Use Efficiencies by Alternative Cropping Systems Based on a Model Approach
title_fullStr Improvement of Water and Nitrogen Use Efficiencies by Alternative Cropping Systems Based on a Model Approach
title_full_unstemmed Improvement of Water and Nitrogen Use Efficiencies by Alternative Cropping Systems Based on a Model Approach
title_short Improvement of Water and Nitrogen Use Efficiencies by Alternative Cropping Systems Based on a Model Approach
title_sort improvement of water and nitrogen use efficiencies by alternative cropping systems based on a model approach
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9919017/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36771681
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/plants12030597
work_keys_str_mv AT hanle improvementofwaterandnitrogenuseefficienciesbyalternativecroppingsystemsbasedonamodelapproach
AT liyunrui improvementofwaterandnitrogenuseefficienciesbyalternativecroppingsystemsbasedonamodelapproach
AT houyonghao improvementofwaterandnitrogenuseefficienciesbyalternativecroppingsystemsbasedonamodelapproach
AT lianghao improvementofwaterandnitrogenuseefficienciesbyalternativecroppingsystemsbasedonamodelapproach
AT fengpuyu improvementofwaterandnitrogenuseefficienciesbyalternativecroppingsystemsbasedonamodelapproach
AT hukelin improvementofwaterandnitrogenuseefficienciesbyalternativecroppingsystemsbasedonamodelapproach