Cargando…

A Comparison of Microstructure and Microhardness Properties of IN718 Fabricated via Powder- and Wire-Fed Laser-Directed Energy Deposition

The objective of this work is to compare the microstructure and microhardness properties of IN718 deposited by both powder- and wire-fed laser-directed energy deposition (L-DED) processes. The powder-fed L-DED is carried out on an Optomec LENS(®) system while the wire-fed L-DED is performed in an in...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Menon, Nandana, Sawyer, Brady A., Jamieson, Cory D., Reutzel, Edward W., Basak, Amrita
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9919414/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36770141
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma16031129
_version_ 1784886819128606720
author Menon, Nandana
Sawyer, Brady A.
Jamieson, Cory D.
Reutzel, Edward W.
Basak, Amrita
author_facet Menon, Nandana
Sawyer, Brady A.
Jamieson, Cory D.
Reutzel, Edward W.
Basak, Amrita
author_sort Menon, Nandana
collection PubMed
description The objective of this work is to compare the microstructure and microhardness properties of IN718 deposited by both powder- and wire-fed laser-directed energy deposition (L-DED) processes. The powder-fed L-DED is carried out on an Optomec LENS(®) system while the wire-fed L-DED is performed in an in-house custom-built system. Several single-layer single-track specimens are fabricated using different combinations of process parameters to down-select the optimal process parameters for both systems. The finalized parameters are, thereafter, used to build thin-wall specimens having identical designs. The specimens are characterized using optical and electron microscopy as well as microhardness measurements. The results demonstrate that the powder-fed specimen, built using optimal process parameters, does not exhibit any distortion. On the contrary, the wire-fed specimen, built with optimal process parameters, show lesser porosity. Differences in elemental segregation are also detected in the two specimens. For example, nitrides and carbides are observed in the wire-fed specimen but not in the powder-fed specimen. The microhardness measurements reveal the powder-fed specimen has higher microhardness values compared to the wire-fed specimen. These results can be used to fabricate parts with sequential powder and wire deposition to achieve biomimetic structures of varying microstructure and microhardness properties.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9919414
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-99194142023-02-12 A Comparison of Microstructure and Microhardness Properties of IN718 Fabricated via Powder- and Wire-Fed Laser-Directed Energy Deposition Menon, Nandana Sawyer, Brady A. Jamieson, Cory D. Reutzel, Edward W. Basak, Amrita Materials (Basel) Article The objective of this work is to compare the microstructure and microhardness properties of IN718 deposited by both powder- and wire-fed laser-directed energy deposition (L-DED) processes. The powder-fed L-DED is carried out on an Optomec LENS(®) system while the wire-fed L-DED is performed in an in-house custom-built system. Several single-layer single-track specimens are fabricated using different combinations of process parameters to down-select the optimal process parameters for both systems. The finalized parameters are, thereafter, used to build thin-wall specimens having identical designs. The specimens are characterized using optical and electron microscopy as well as microhardness measurements. The results demonstrate that the powder-fed specimen, built using optimal process parameters, does not exhibit any distortion. On the contrary, the wire-fed specimen, built with optimal process parameters, show lesser porosity. Differences in elemental segregation are also detected in the two specimens. For example, nitrides and carbides are observed in the wire-fed specimen but not in the powder-fed specimen. The microhardness measurements reveal the powder-fed specimen has higher microhardness values compared to the wire-fed specimen. These results can be used to fabricate parts with sequential powder and wire deposition to achieve biomimetic structures of varying microstructure and microhardness properties. MDPI 2023-01-28 /pmc/articles/PMC9919414/ /pubmed/36770141 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma16031129 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Menon, Nandana
Sawyer, Brady A.
Jamieson, Cory D.
Reutzel, Edward W.
Basak, Amrita
A Comparison of Microstructure and Microhardness Properties of IN718 Fabricated via Powder- and Wire-Fed Laser-Directed Energy Deposition
title A Comparison of Microstructure and Microhardness Properties of IN718 Fabricated via Powder- and Wire-Fed Laser-Directed Energy Deposition
title_full A Comparison of Microstructure and Microhardness Properties of IN718 Fabricated via Powder- and Wire-Fed Laser-Directed Energy Deposition
title_fullStr A Comparison of Microstructure and Microhardness Properties of IN718 Fabricated via Powder- and Wire-Fed Laser-Directed Energy Deposition
title_full_unstemmed A Comparison of Microstructure and Microhardness Properties of IN718 Fabricated via Powder- and Wire-Fed Laser-Directed Energy Deposition
title_short A Comparison of Microstructure and Microhardness Properties of IN718 Fabricated via Powder- and Wire-Fed Laser-Directed Energy Deposition
title_sort comparison of microstructure and microhardness properties of in718 fabricated via powder- and wire-fed laser-directed energy deposition
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9919414/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36770141
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma16031129
work_keys_str_mv AT menonnandana acomparisonofmicrostructureandmicrohardnesspropertiesofin718fabricatedviapowderandwirefedlaserdirectedenergydeposition
AT sawyerbradya acomparisonofmicrostructureandmicrohardnesspropertiesofin718fabricatedviapowderandwirefedlaserdirectedenergydeposition
AT jamiesoncoryd acomparisonofmicrostructureandmicrohardnesspropertiesofin718fabricatedviapowderandwirefedlaserdirectedenergydeposition
AT reutzeledwardw acomparisonofmicrostructureandmicrohardnesspropertiesofin718fabricatedviapowderandwirefedlaserdirectedenergydeposition
AT basakamrita acomparisonofmicrostructureandmicrohardnesspropertiesofin718fabricatedviapowderandwirefedlaserdirectedenergydeposition
AT menonnandana comparisonofmicrostructureandmicrohardnesspropertiesofin718fabricatedviapowderandwirefedlaserdirectedenergydeposition
AT sawyerbradya comparisonofmicrostructureandmicrohardnesspropertiesofin718fabricatedviapowderandwirefedlaserdirectedenergydeposition
AT jamiesoncoryd comparisonofmicrostructureandmicrohardnesspropertiesofin718fabricatedviapowderandwirefedlaserdirectedenergydeposition
AT reutzeledwardw comparisonofmicrostructureandmicrohardnesspropertiesofin718fabricatedviapowderandwirefedlaserdirectedenergydeposition
AT basakamrita comparisonofmicrostructureandmicrohardnesspropertiesofin718fabricatedviapowderandwirefedlaserdirectedenergydeposition