Cargando…

A Novel Digital Digit-Symbol Substitution Test Measuring Processing Speed in Adults At Risk for Alzheimer Disease: Validation Study

BACKGROUND: Assessing cognitive constructs affected by Alzheimer disease, such as processing speed (PS), is important to screen for potential disease and allow for early detection. Digital PS assessments have been developed to provide widespread, efficient cognitive testing, but all have been valida...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Campitelli, Anthony, Paulson, Sally, Gills, Josh L, Jones, Megan D, Madero, Erica N, Myers, Jennifer, Glenn, Jordan M, Gray, Michelle
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: JMIR Publications 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9919459/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36705951
http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/36663
_version_ 1784886830235123712
author Campitelli, Anthony
Paulson, Sally
Gills, Josh L
Jones, Megan D
Madero, Erica N
Myers, Jennifer
Glenn, Jordan M
Gray, Michelle
author_facet Campitelli, Anthony
Paulson, Sally
Gills, Josh L
Jones, Megan D
Madero, Erica N
Myers, Jennifer
Glenn, Jordan M
Gray, Michelle
author_sort Campitelli, Anthony
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Assessing cognitive constructs affected by Alzheimer disease, such as processing speed (PS), is important to screen for potential disease and allow for early detection. Digital PS assessments have been developed to provide widespread, efficient cognitive testing, but all have been validated only based on the correlation between test scores. Best statistical practices dictate that concurrent validity should be assessed for agreement or equivalence rather than using correlation alone. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to assess the concurrent validity of a novel digital PS assessment against a gold-standard measure of PS. METHODS: Adults aged 45-75 years (n=191) participated in this study. Participants completed the novel digital digit-symbol substitution test (DDSST) and the Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status coding test (RBANS-C). The correlation between the test scores was determined using a Pearson product-moment correlation, and a difference in mean test scores between tests was checked for using a 2-tailed dependent samples t test. Data were analyzed for agreement between the 2 tests using Bland-Altman limits of agreement and equivalency using a two one-sided t tests (TOST) approach. RESULTS: A significant moderate, positive correlation was found between DDSST and RBANS-C scores (r=.577; P<.001), and no difference in mean scores was detected between the tests (P=.93). Bias was nearly zero (0.04). Scores between the tests were found to display adequate agreement with 90% of score differences falling between –22.66 and 22.75 (90% limits of agreement=–22.91 to 22.99), and the scores were equivalent (P=.049). CONCLUSIONS: Analyses indicate that the DDSST is a valid digital assessment of PS. The DDSST appears to be a suitable option for widespread, immediate, and efficient PS testing. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04559789; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04559789
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9919459
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher JMIR Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-99194592023-02-12 A Novel Digital Digit-Symbol Substitution Test Measuring Processing Speed in Adults At Risk for Alzheimer Disease: Validation Study Campitelli, Anthony Paulson, Sally Gills, Josh L Jones, Megan D Madero, Erica N Myers, Jennifer Glenn, Jordan M Gray, Michelle JMIR Aging Original Paper BACKGROUND: Assessing cognitive constructs affected by Alzheimer disease, such as processing speed (PS), is important to screen for potential disease and allow for early detection. Digital PS assessments have been developed to provide widespread, efficient cognitive testing, but all have been validated only based on the correlation between test scores. Best statistical practices dictate that concurrent validity should be assessed for agreement or equivalence rather than using correlation alone. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to assess the concurrent validity of a novel digital PS assessment against a gold-standard measure of PS. METHODS: Adults aged 45-75 years (n=191) participated in this study. Participants completed the novel digital digit-symbol substitution test (DDSST) and the Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status coding test (RBANS-C). The correlation between the test scores was determined using a Pearson product-moment correlation, and a difference in mean test scores between tests was checked for using a 2-tailed dependent samples t test. Data were analyzed for agreement between the 2 tests using Bland-Altman limits of agreement and equivalency using a two one-sided t tests (TOST) approach. RESULTS: A significant moderate, positive correlation was found between DDSST and RBANS-C scores (r=.577; P<.001), and no difference in mean scores was detected between the tests (P=.93). Bias was nearly zero (0.04). Scores between the tests were found to display adequate agreement with 90% of score differences falling between –22.66 and 22.75 (90% limits of agreement=–22.91 to 22.99), and the scores were equivalent (P=.049). CONCLUSIONS: Analyses indicate that the DDSST is a valid digital assessment of PS. The DDSST appears to be a suitable option for widespread, immediate, and efficient PS testing. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04559789; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04559789 JMIR Publications 2023-01-27 /pmc/articles/PMC9919459/ /pubmed/36705951 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/36663 Text en ©Anthony Campitelli, Sally Paulson, Josh L Gills, Megan D Jones, Erica N Madero, Jennifer Myers, Jordan M Glenn, Michelle Gray. Originally published in JMIR Aging (https://aging.jmir.org), 27.01.2023. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in JMIR Aging, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on https://aging.jmir.org, as well as this copyright and license information must be included.
spellingShingle Original Paper
Campitelli, Anthony
Paulson, Sally
Gills, Josh L
Jones, Megan D
Madero, Erica N
Myers, Jennifer
Glenn, Jordan M
Gray, Michelle
A Novel Digital Digit-Symbol Substitution Test Measuring Processing Speed in Adults At Risk for Alzheimer Disease: Validation Study
title A Novel Digital Digit-Symbol Substitution Test Measuring Processing Speed in Adults At Risk for Alzheimer Disease: Validation Study
title_full A Novel Digital Digit-Symbol Substitution Test Measuring Processing Speed in Adults At Risk for Alzheimer Disease: Validation Study
title_fullStr A Novel Digital Digit-Symbol Substitution Test Measuring Processing Speed in Adults At Risk for Alzheimer Disease: Validation Study
title_full_unstemmed A Novel Digital Digit-Symbol Substitution Test Measuring Processing Speed in Adults At Risk for Alzheimer Disease: Validation Study
title_short A Novel Digital Digit-Symbol Substitution Test Measuring Processing Speed in Adults At Risk for Alzheimer Disease: Validation Study
title_sort novel digital digit-symbol substitution test measuring processing speed in adults at risk for alzheimer disease: validation study
topic Original Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9919459/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36705951
http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/36663
work_keys_str_mv AT campitellianthony anoveldigitaldigitsymbolsubstitutiontestmeasuringprocessingspeedinadultsatriskforalzheimerdiseasevalidationstudy
AT paulsonsally anoveldigitaldigitsymbolsubstitutiontestmeasuringprocessingspeedinadultsatriskforalzheimerdiseasevalidationstudy
AT gillsjoshl anoveldigitaldigitsymbolsubstitutiontestmeasuringprocessingspeedinadultsatriskforalzheimerdiseasevalidationstudy
AT jonesmegand anoveldigitaldigitsymbolsubstitutiontestmeasuringprocessingspeedinadultsatriskforalzheimerdiseasevalidationstudy
AT maderoerican anoveldigitaldigitsymbolsubstitutiontestmeasuringprocessingspeedinadultsatriskforalzheimerdiseasevalidationstudy
AT myersjennifer anoveldigitaldigitsymbolsubstitutiontestmeasuringprocessingspeedinadultsatriskforalzheimerdiseasevalidationstudy
AT glennjordanm anoveldigitaldigitsymbolsubstitutiontestmeasuringprocessingspeedinadultsatriskforalzheimerdiseasevalidationstudy
AT graymichelle anoveldigitaldigitsymbolsubstitutiontestmeasuringprocessingspeedinadultsatriskforalzheimerdiseasevalidationstudy
AT campitellianthony noveldigitaldigitsymbolsubstitutiontestmeasuringprocessingspeedinadultsatriskforalzheimerdiseasevalidationstudy
AT paulsonsally noveldigitaldigitsymbolsubstitutiontestmeasuringprocessingspeedinadultsatriskforalzheimerdiseasevalidationstudy
AT gillsjoshl noveldigitaldigitsymbolsubstitutiontestmeasuringprocessingspeedinadultsatriskforalzheimerdiseasevalidationstudy
AT jonesmegand noveldigitaldigitsymbolsubstitutiontestmeasuringprocessingspeedinadultsatriskforalzheimerdiseasevalidationstudy
AT maderoerican noveldigitaldigitsymbolsubstitutiontestmeasuringprocessingspeedinadultsatriskforalzheimerdiseasevalidationstudy
AT myersjennifer noveldigitaldigitsymbolsubstitutiontestmeasuringprocessingspeedinadultsatriskforalzheimerdiseasevalidationstudy
AT glennjordanm noveldigitaldigitsymbolsubstitutiontestmeasuringprocessingspeedinadultsatriskforalzheimerdiseasevalidationstudy
AT graymichelle noveldigitaldigitsymbolsubstitutiontestmeasuringprocessingspeedinadultsatriskforalzheimerdiseasevalidationstudy