Cargando…
A Novel Digital Digit-Symbol Substitution Test Measuring Processing Speed in Adults At Risk for Alzheimer Disease: Validation Study
BACKGROUND: Assessing cognitive constructs affected by Alzheimer disease, such as processing speed (PS), is important to screen for potential disease and allow for early detection. Digital PS assessments have been developed to provide widespread, efficient cognitive testing, but all have been valida...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
JMIR Publications
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9919459/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36705951 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/36663 |
_version_ | 1784886830235123712 |
---|---|
author | Campitelli, Anthony Paulson, Sally Gills, Josh L Jones, Megan D Madero, Erica N Myers, Jennifer Glenn, Jordan M Gray, Michelle |
author_facet | Campitelli, Anthony Paulson, Sally Gills, Josh L Jones, Megan D Madero, Erica N Myers, Jennifer Glenn, Jordan M Gray, Michelle |
author_sort | Campitelli, Anthony |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Assessing cognitive constructs affected by Alzheimer disease, such as processing speed (PS), is important to screen for potential disease and allow for early detection. Digital PS assessments have been developed to provide widespread, efficient cognitive testing, but all have been validated only based on the correlation between test scores. Best statistical practices dictate that concurrent validity should be assessed for agreement or equivalence rather than using correlation alone. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to assess the concurrent validity of a novel digital PS assessment against a gold-standard measure of PS. METHODS: Adults aged 45-75 years (n=191) participated in this study. Participants completed the novel digital digit-symbol substitution test (DDSST) and the Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status coding test (RBANS-C). The correlation between the test scores was determined using a Pearson product-moment correlation, and a difference in mean test scores between tests was checked for using a 2-tailed dependent samples t test. Data were analyzed for agreement between the 2 tests using Bland-Altman limits of agreement and equivalency using a two one-sided t tests (TOST) approach. RESULTS: A significant moderate, positive correlation was found between DDSST and RBANS-C scores (r=.577; P<.001), and no difference in mean scores was detected between the tests (P=.93). Bias was nearly zero (0.04). Scores between the tests were found to display adequate agreement with 90% of score differences falling between –22.66 and 22.75 (90% limits of agreement=–22.91 to 22.99), and the scores were equivalent (P=.049). CONCLUSIONS: Analyses indicate that the DDSST is a valid digital assessment of PS. The DDSST appears to be a suitable option for widespread, immediate, and efficient PS testing. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04559789; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04559789 |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9919459 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | JMIR Publications |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-99194592023-02-12 A Novel Digital Digit-Symbol Substitution Test Measuring Processing Speed in Adults At Risk for Alzheimer Disease: Validation Study Campitelli, Anthony Paulson, Sally Gills, Josh L Jones, Megan D Madero, Erica N Myers, Jennifer Glenn, Jordan M Gray, Michelle JMIR Aging Original Paper BACKGROUND: Assessing cognitive constructs affected by Alzheimer disease, such as processing speed (PS), is important to screen for potential disease and allow for early detection. Digital PS assessments have been developed to provide widespread, efficient cognitive testing, but all have been validated only based on the correlation between test scores. Best statistical practices dictate that concurrent validity should be assessed for agreement or equivalence rather than using correlation alone. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to assess the concurrent validity of a novel digital PS assessment against a gold-standard measure of PS. METHODS: Adults aged 45-75 years (n=191) participated in this study. Participants completed the novel digital digit-symbol substitution test (DDSST) and the Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status coding test (RBANS-C). The correlation between the test scores was determined using a Pearson product-moment correlation, and a difference in mean test scores between tests was checked for using a 2-tailed dependent samples t test. Data were analyzed for agreement between the 2 tests using Bland-Altman limits of agreement and equivalency using a two one-sided t tests (TOST) approach. RESULTS: A significant moderate, positive correlation was found between DDSST and RBANS-C scores (r=.577; P<.001), and no difference in mean scores was detected between the tests (P=.93). Bias was nearly zero (0.04). Scores between the tests were found to display adequate agreement with 90% of score differences falling between –22.66 and 22.75 (90% limits of agreement=–22.91 to 22.99), and the scores were equivalent (P=.049). CONCLUSIONS: Analyses indicate that the DDSST is a valid digital assessment of PS. The DDSST appears to be a suitable option for widespread, immediate, and efficient PS testing. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04559789; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04559789 JMIR Publications 2023-01-27 /pmc/articles/PMC9919459/ /pubmed/36705951 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/36663 Text en ©Anthony Campitelli, Sally Paulson, Josh L Gills, Megan D Jones, Erica N Madero, Jennifer Myers, Jordan M Glenn, Michelle Gray. Originally published in JMIR Aging (https://aging.jmir.org), 27.01.2023. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in JMIR Aging, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on https://aging.jmir.org, as well as this copyright and license information must be included. |
spellingShingle | Original Paper Campitelli, Anthony Paulson, Sally Gills, Josh L Jones, Megan D Madero, Erica N Myers, Jennifer Glenn, Jordan M Gray, Michelle A Novel Digital Digit-Symbol Substitution Test Measuring Processing Speed in Adults At Risk for Alzheimer Disease: Validation Study |
title | A Novel Digital Digit-Symbol Substitution Test Measuring Processing Speed in Adults At Risk for Alzheimer Disease: Validation Study |
title_full | A Novel Digital Digit-Symbol Substitution Test Measuring Processing Speed in Adults At Risk for Alzheimer Disease: Validation Study |
title_fullStr | A Novel Digital Digit-Symbol Substitution Test Measuring Processing Speed in Adults At Risk for Alzheimer Disease: Validation Study |
title_full_unstemmed | A Novel Digital Digit-Symbol Substitution Test Measuring Processing Speed in Adults At Risk for Alzheimer Disease: Validation Study |
title_short | A Novel Digital Digit-Symbol Substitution Test Measuring Processing Speed in Adults At Risk for Alzheimer Disease: Validation Study |
title_sort | novel digital digit-symbol substitution test measuring processing speed in adults at risk for alzheimer disease: validation study |
topic | Original Paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9919459/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36705951 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/36663 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT campitellianthony anoveldigitaldigitsymbolsubstitutiontestmeasuringprocessingspeedinadultsatriskforalzheimerdiseasevalidationstudy AT paulsonsally anoveldigitaldigitsymbolsubstitutiontestmeasuringprocessingspeedinadultsatriskforalzheimerdiseasevalidationstudy AT gillsjoshl anoveldigitaldigitsymbolsubstitutiontestmeasuringprocessingspeedinadultsatriskforalzheimerdiseasevalidationstudy AT jonesmegand anoveldigitaldigitsymbolsubstitutiontestmeasuringprocessingspeedinadultsatriskforalzheimerdiseasevalidationstudy AT maderoerican anoveldigitaldigitsymbolsubstitutiontestmeasuringprocessingspeedinadultsatriskforalzheimerdiseasevalidationstudy AT myersjennifer anoveldigitaldigitsymbolsubstitutiontestmeasuringprocessingspeedinadultsatriskforalzheimerdiseasevalidationstudy AT glennjordanm anoveldigitaldigitsymbolsubstitutiontestmeasuringprocessingspeedinadultsatriskforalzheimerdiseasevalidationstudy AT graymichelle anoveldigitaldigitsymbolsubstitutiontestmeasuringprocessingspeedinadultsatriskforalzheimerdiseasevalidationstudy AT campitellianthony noveldigitaldigitsymbolsubstitutiontestmeasuringprocessingspeedinadultsatriskforalzheimerdiseasevalidationstudy AT paulsonsally noveldigitaldigitsymbolsubstitutiontestmeasuringprocessingspeedinadultsatriskforalzheimerdiseasevalidationstudy AT gillsjoshl noveldigitaldigitsymbolsubstitutiontestmeasuringprocessingspeedinadultsatriskforalzheimerdiseasevalidationstudy AT jonesmegand noveldigitaldigitsymbolsubstitutiontestmeasuringprocessingspeedinadultsatriskforalzheimerdiseasevalidationstudy AT maderoerican noveldigitaldigitsymbolsubstitutiontestmeasuringprocessingspeedinadultsatriskforalzheimerdiseasevalidationstudy AT myersjennifer noveldigitaldigitsymbolsubstitutiontestmeasuringprocessingspeedinadultsatriskforalzheimerdiseasevalidationstudy AT glennjordanm noveldigitaldigitsymbolsubstitutiontestmeasuringprocessingspeedinadultsatriskforalzheimerdiseasevalidationstudy AT graymichelle noveldigitaldigitsymbolsubstitutiontestmeasuringprocessingspeedinadultsatriskforalzheimerdiseasevalidationstudy |