Cargando…

Energy Recovery from Polymeric 3D Printing Waste and Olive Pomace Mixtures via Thermal Gasification—Effect of Temperature

One of the polymeric materials used in the most common 3D printers is poly(ethylene terephthalate) glycol (PETG). It represents, in world terms, around 2.3% of polymeric raw material used in additive manufacturing. However, after processing this material, its properties change irreversibly. A signif...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Díaz-Perete, Daniel, Hermoso-Orzáez, Manuel Jesús, Carmo-Calado, Luís, Martín-Doñate, Cristina, Terrados-Cepeda, Julio
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9920420/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36772051
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/polym15030750
_version_ 1784887065745293312
author Díaz-Perete, Daniel
Hermoso-Orzáez, Manuel Jesús
Carmo-Calado, Luís
Martín-Doñate, Cristina
Terrados-Cepeda, Julio
author_facet Díaz-Perete, Daniel
Hermoso-Orzáez, Manuel Jesús
Carmo-Calado, Luís
Martín-Doñate, Cristina
Terrados-Cepeda, Julio
author_sort Díaz-Perete, Daniel
collection PubMed
description One of the polymeric materials used in the most common 3D printers is poly(ethylene terephthalate) glycol (PETG). It represents, in world terms, around 2.3% of polymeric raw material used in additive manufacturing. However, after processing this material, its properties change irreversibly. A significant amount of waste is produced around the world, and its disposal is usually destined for landfill or incineration, which can generate an important issue due to the high environmental risks. Polymer waste from 3D printing, hereinafter 3DPPW, has a relatively high calorific value and adequate characteristics to be valued in thermochemical processes. Gasification emerges as an innovative and alternative solution for recovering energy from 3DPPW, mixed with residues of lignocellulosic origin, and presents some environmental advantages compared to other types of thermochemical treatments, since the gasification process releases smaller amounts of NOx into the atmosphere, SOx, and CO(2). In the case of the study, co-gasification of olive pomace (OLB) was carried out with small additions of 3DPPW (10% and 20%) at different temperatures. Comparing the different gasifications (100% OLB, 90% OLB + 10% 3DPPW, 80% OLB + 20% 3DPPW), the best results for the synthesis gas were obtained for the mixture of 10% 3DPPW and 90% olive pomace (OLB), having a lower calorific value of 6.16 MJ/m(3), synthesis gas yield of 3.19%, and cold gas efficiency of 87.85% for a gasification temperature of 750 °C. In addition, the results demonstrate that the addition of 3DPPW improved the quality of syngas, especially between temperatures of 750 and 850 °C. Including polymeric 3D printing materials in the context of the circular economy and extending their life cycle helps to improve the efficiency of subsequent industrial processes, reducing process costs in general, thanks to the new industrial value acquired by the generated by-products.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9920420
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-99204202023-02-12 Energy Recovery from Polymeric 3D Printing Waste and Olive Pomace Mixtures via Thermal Gasification—Effect of Temperature Díaz-Perete, Daniel Hermoso-Orzáez, Manuel Jesús Carmo-Calado, Luís Martín-Doñate, Cristina Terrados-Cepeda, Julio Polymers (Basel) Article One of the polymeric materials used in the most common 3D printers is poly(ethylene terephthalate) glycol (PETG). It represents, in world terms, around 2.3% of polymeric raw material used in additive manufacturing. However, after processing this material, its properties change irreversibly. A significant amount of waste is produced around the world, and its disposal is usually destined for landfill or incineration, which can generate an important issue due to the high environmental risks. Polymer waste from 3D printing, hereinafter 3DPPW, has a relatively high calorific value and adequate characteristics to be valued in thermochemical processes. Gasification emerges as an innovative and alternative solution for recovering energy from 3DPPW, mixed with residues of lignocellulosic origin, and presents some environmental advantages compared to other types of thermochemical treatments, since the gasification process releases smaller amounts of NOx into the atmosphere, SOx, and CO(2). In the case of the study, co-gasification of olive pomace (OLB) was carried out with small additions of 3DPPW (10% and 20%) at different temperatures. Comparing the different gasifications (100% OLB, 90% OLB + 10% 3DPPW, 80% OLB + 20% 3DPPW), the best results for the synthesis gas were obtained for the mixture of 10% 3DPPW and 90% olive pomace (OLB), having a lower calorific value of 6.16 MJ/m(3), synthesis gas yield of 3.19%, and cold gas efficiency of 87.85% for a gasification temperature of 750 °C. In addition, the results demonstrate that the addition of 3DPPW improved the quality of syngas, especially between temperatures of 750 and 850 °C. Including polymeric 3D printing materials in the context of the circular economy and extending their life cycle helps to improve the efficiency of subsequent industrial processes, reducing process costs in general, thanks to the new industrial value acquired by the generated by-products. MDPI 2023-02-01 /pmc/articles/PMC9920420/ /pubmed/36772051 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/polym15030750 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Díaz-Perete, Daniel
Hermoso-Orzáez, Manuel Jesús
Carmo-Calado, Luís
Martín-Doñate, Cristina
Terrados-Cepeda, Julio
Energy Recovery from Polymeric 3D Printing Waste and Olive Pomace Mixtures via Thermal Gasification—Effect of Temperature
title Energy Recovery from Polymeric 3D Printing Waste and Olive Pomace Mixtures via Thermal Gasification—Effect of Temperature
title_full Energy Recovery from Polymeric 3D Printing Waste and Olive Pomace Mixtures via Thermal Gasification—Effect of Temperature
title_fullStr Energy Recovery from Polymeric 3D Printing Waste and Olive Pomace Mixtures via Thermal Gasification—Effect of Temperature
title_full_unstemmed Energy Recovery from Polymeric 3D Printing Waste and Olive Pomace Mixtures via Thermal Gasification—Effect of Temperature
title_short Energy Recovery from Polymeric 3D Printing Waste and Olive Pomace Mixtures via Thermal Gasification—Effect of Temperature
title_sort energy recovery from polymeric 3d printing waste and olive pomace mixtures via thermal gasification—effect of temperature
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9920420/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36772051
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/polym15030750
work_keys_str_mv AT diazperetedaniel energyrecoveryfrompolymeric3dprintingwasteandolivepomacemixturesviathermalgasificationeffectoftemperature
AT hermosoorzaezmanueljesus energyrecoveryfrompolymeric3dprintingwasteandolivepomacemixturesviathermalgasificationeffectoftemperature
AT carmocaladoluis energyrecoveryfrompolymeric3dprintingwasteandolivepomacemixturesviathermalgasificationeffectoftemperature
AT martindonatecristina energyrecoveryfrompolymeric3dprintingwasteandolivepomacemixturesviathermalgasificationeffectoftemperature
AT terradoscepedajulio energyrecoveryfrompolymeric3dprintingwasteandolivepomacemixturesviathermalgasificationeffectoftemperature