Cargando…
Image Noise Removal in Ultrasound Breast Images Based on Hybrid Deep Learning Technique
Rapid improvements in ultrasound imaging technology have made it much more useful for screening and diagnosing breast problems. Local-speckle-noise destruction in ultrasound breast images may impair image quality and impact observation and diagnosis. It is crucial to remove localized noise from imag...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9920830/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36772207 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s23031167 |
_version_ | 1784887166310023168 |
---|---|
author | Vimala, Baiju Babu Srinivasan, Saravanan Mathivanan, Sandeep Kumar Muthukumaran, Venkatesan Babu, Jyothi Chinna Herencsar, Norbert Vilcekova, Lucia |
author_facet | Vimala, Baiju Babu Srinivasan, Saravanan Mathivanan, Sandeep Kumar Muthukumaran, Venkatesan Babu, Jyothi Chinna Herencsar, Norbert Vilcekova, Lucia |
author_sort | Vimala, Baiju Babu |
collection | PubMed |
description | Rapid improvements in ultrasound imaging technology have made it much more useful for screening and diagnosing breast problems. Local-speckle-noise destruction in ultrasound breast images may impair image quality and impact observation and diagnosis. It is crucial to remove localized noise from images. In the article, we have used the hybrid deep learning technique to remove local speckle noise from breast ultrasound images. The contrast of ultrasound breast images was first improved using logarithmic and exponential transforms, and then guided filter algorithms were used to enhance the details of the glandular ultrasound breast images. In order to finish the pre-processing of ultrasound breast images and enhance image clarity, spatial high-pass filtering algorithms were used to remove the extreme sharpening. In order to remove local speckle noise without sacrificing the image edges, edge-sensitive terms were eventually added to the Logical-Pool Recurrent Neural Network (LPRNN). The mean square error and false recognition rate both fell below 1.1% at the hundredth training iteration, showing that the LPRNN had been properly trained. Ultrasound images that have had local speckle noise destroyed had signal-to-noise ratios (SNRs) greater than 65 dB, peak SNR ratios larger than 70 dB, edge preservation index values greater than the experimental threshold of 0.48, and quick destruction times. The time required to destroy local speckle noise is low, edge information is preserved, and image features are brought into sharp focus. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9920830 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-99208302023-02-12 Image Noise Removal in Ultrasound Breast Images Based on Hybrid Deep Learning Technique Vimala, Baiju Babu Srinivasan, Saravanan Mathivanan, Sandeep Kumar Muthukumaran, Venkatesan Babu, Jyothi Chinna Herencsar, Norbert Vilcekova, Lucia Sensors (Basel) Article Rapid improvements in ultrasound imaging technology have made it much more useful for screening and diagnosing breast problems. Local-speckle-noise destruction in ultrasound breast images may impair image quality and impact observation and diagnosis. It is crucial to remove localized noise from images. In the article, we have used the hybrid deep learning technique to remove local speckle noise from breast ultrasound images. The contrast of ultrasound breast images was first improved using logarithmic and exponential transforms, and then guided filter algorithms were used to enhance the details of the glandular ultrasound breast images. In order to finish the pre-processing of ultrasound breast images and enhance image clarity, spatial high-pass filtering algorithms were used to remove the extreme sharpening. In order to remove local speckle noise without sacrificing the image edges, edge-sensitive terms were eventually added to the Logical-Pool Recurrent Neural Network (LPRNN). The mean square error and false recognition rate both fell below 1.1% at the hundredth training iteration, showing that the LPRNN had been properly trained. Ultrasound images that have had local speckle noise destroyed had signal-to-noise ratios (SNRs) greater than 65 dB, peak SNR ratios larger than 70 dB, edge preservation index values greater than the experimental threshold of 0.48, and quick destruction times. The time required to destroy local speckle noise is low, edge information is preserved, and image features are brought into sharp focus. MDPI 2023-01-19 /pmc/articles/PMC9920830/ /pubmed/36772207 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s23031167 Text en © 2023 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Vimala, Baiju Babu Srinivasan, Saravanan Mathivanan, Sandeep Kumar Muthukumaran, Venkatesan Babu, Jyothi Chinna Herencsar, Norbert Vilcekova, Lucia Image Noise Removal in Ultrasound Breast Images Based on Hybrid Deep Learning Technique |
title | Image Noise Removal in Ultrasound Breast Images Based on Hybrid Deep Learning Technique |
title_full | Image Noise Removal in Ultrasound Breast Images Based on Hybrid Deep Learning Technique |
title_fullStr | Image Noise Removal in Ultrasound Breast Images Based on Hybrid Deep Learning Technique |
title_full_unstemmed | Image Noise Removal in Ultrasound Breast Images Based on Hybrid Deep Learning Technique |
title_short | Image Noise Removal in Ultrasound Breast Images Based on Hybrid Deep Learning Technique |
title_sort | image noise removal in ultrasound breast images based on hybrid deep learning technique |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9920830/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36772207 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s23031167 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT vimalabaijubabu imagenoiseremovalinultrasoundbreastimagesbasedonhybriddeeplearningtechnique AT srinivasansaravanan imagenoiseremovalinultrasoundbreastimagesbasedonhybriddeeplearningtechnique AT mathivanansandeepkumar imagenoiseremovalinultrasoundbreastimagesbasedonhybriddeeplearningtechnique AT muthukumaranvenkatesan imagenoiseremovalinultrasoundbreastimagesbasedonhybriddeeplearningtechnique AT babujyothichinna imagenoiseremovalinultrasoundbreastimagesbasedonhybriddeeplearningtechnique AT herencsarnorbert imagenoiseremovalinultrasoundbreastimagesbasedonhybriddeeplearningtechnique AT vilcekovalucia imagenoiseremovalinultrasoundbreastimagesbasedonhybriddeeplearningtechnique |