Cargando…
Comparison of posterior muscle-preserving selective laminectomy and laminectomy with fusion for treating cervical spondylotic myelopathy: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
BACKGROUND: Cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM) is the predominant cause of spinal cord dysfunction in the elderly. The patients are often frail and susceptible to complications. Posterior surgical techniques involving non-fusion are complicated by postlaminectomy kyphosis and instrumented fusion...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9921403/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36765352 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-023-07123-4 |
_version_ | 1784887303656701952 |
---|---|
author | MacDowall, Anna Löfgren, Håkan Edström, Erik Brisby, Helena Parai, Catharina Elmi-Terander, Adrian |
author_facet | MacDowall, Anna Löfgren, Håkan Edström, Erik Brisby, Helena Parai, Catharina Elmi-Terander, Adrian |
author_sort | MacDowall, Anna |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM) is the predominant cause of spinal cord dysfunction in the elderly. The patients are often frail and susceptible to complications. Posterior surgical techniques involving non-fusion are complicated by postlaminectomy kyphosis and instrumented fusion techniques by distal junction kyphosis, pseudarthrosis, or implant failure. The optimal surgical approach is still a matter of controversy. Since anterior and posterior fusion techniques have been compared without presenting any superiority, the objective of this study is to compare stand-alone laminectomy with laminectomy and fusion to determine which treatment has the lowest frequency of reoperations. METHODS: This is a multicenter randomized, controlled, parallel-group non-inferiority trial. A total of 300 adult patients are allocated in a ratio of 1:1. The primary endpoint is reoperation for any reason at 5 years of follow-up. Sample size and power calculation were performed by estimating the reoperation rate after laminectomy to 3.5% and after laminectomy with fusion to 7.4% based on the data from the Swedish spine registry (Swespine) on patients with CSM. Secondary outcomes are the patient-derived Japanese Orthopaedic Association (P-mJOA) score, Neck Disability Index (NDI), European Quality of Life Five Dimensions (EQ-5D), Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) for neck and arm pain, Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), development of kyphosis measured as the cervical sagittal vertical axis (cSVA), and death. Clinical and radiological follow-up is performed at 3, 12, 24, and 60 months after surgery. The main inclusion criterium is 1–4 levels of CSM in the subaxial spine, C3–C7. The REDcap software will be used for safe data management. Data will be analyzed according to the modified intention to treat (mITT) population, defined as randomized patients who are still alive without having emigrated or left the study after 2 and 5 years. DISCUSSION: This will be the first randomized controlled trial comparing two of the most common surgical treatments for CSM: the posterior muscle-preserving selective laminectomy and posterior laminectomy with instrumented fusion. The results of the myelopathy randomized controlled (MyRanC) study will provide surgical treatment recommendations for CSM. This may result in improvements in surgical treatment and clinical practice regarding CSM. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04936074. Registered on 23 June 2021 SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13063-023-07123-4. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9921403 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-99214032023-02-12 Comparison of posterior muscle-preserving selective laminectomy and laminectomy with fusion for treating cervical spondylotic myelopathy: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial MacDowall, Anna Löfgren, Håkan Edström, Erik Brisby, Helena Parai, Catharina Elmi-Terander, Adrian Trials Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM) is the predominant cause of spinal cord dysfunction in the elderly. The patients are often frail and susceptible to complications. Posterior surgical techniques involving non-fusion are complicated by postlaminectomy kyphosis and instrumented fusion techniques by distal junction kyphosis, pseudarthrosis, or implant failure. The optimal surgical approach is still a matter of controversy. Since anterior and posterior fusion techniques have been compared without presenting any superiority, the objective of this study is to compare stand-alone laminectomy with laminectomy and fusion to determine which treatment has the lowest frequency of reoperations. METHODS: This is a multicenter randomized, controlled, parallel-group non-inferiority trial. A total of 300 adult patients are allocated in a ratio of 1:1. The primary endpoint is reoperation for any reason at 5 years of follow-up. Sample size and power calculation were performed by estimating the reoperation rate after laminectomy to 3.5% and after laminectomy with fusion to 7.4% based on the data from the Swedish spine registry (Swespine) on patients with CSM. Secondary outcomes are the patient-derived Japanese Orthopaedic Association (P-mJOA) score, Neck Disability Index (NDI), European Quality of Life Five Dimensions (EQ-5D), Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) for neck and arm pain, Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), development of kyphosis measured as the cervical sagittal vertical axis (cSVA), and death. Clinical and radiological follow-up is performed at 3, 12, 24, and 60 months after surgery. The main inclusion criterium is 1–4 levels of CSM in the subaxial spine, C3–C7. The REDcap software will be used for safe data management. Data will be analyzed according to the modified intention to treat (mITT) population, defined as randomized patients who are still alive without having emigrated or left the study after 2 and 5 years. DISCUSSION: This will be the first randomized controlled trial comparing two of the most common surgical treatments for CSM: the posterior muscle-preserving selective laminectomy and posterior laminectomy with instrumented fusion. The results of the myelopathy randomized controlled (MyRanC) study will provide surgical treatment recommendations for CSM. This may result in improvements in surgical treatment and clinical practice regarding CSM. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04936074. Registered on 23 June 2021 SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13063-023-07123-4. BioMed Central 2023-02-11 /pmc/articles/PMC9921403/ /pubmed/36765352 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-023-07123-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Study Protocol MacDowall, Anna Löfgren, Håkan Edström, Erik Brisby, Helena Parai, Catharina Elmi-Terander, Adrian Comparison of posterior muscle-preserving selective laminectomy and laminectomy with fusion for treating cervical spondylotic myelopathy: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial |
title | Comparison of posterior muscle-preserving selective laminectomy and laminectomy with fusion for treating cervical spondylotic myelopathy: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial |
title_full | Comparison of posterior muscle-preserving selective laminectomy and laminectomy with fusion for treating cervical spondylotic myelopathy: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial |
title_fullStr | Comparison of posterior muscle-preserving selective laminectomy and laminectomy with fusion for treating cervical spondylotic myelopathy: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of posterior muscle-preserving selective laminectomy and laminectomy with fusion for treating cervical spondylotic myelopathy: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial |
title_short | Comparison of posterior muscle-preserving selective laminectomy and laminectomy with fusion for treating cervical spondylotic myelopathy: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial |
title_sort | comparison of posterior muscle-preserving selective laminectomy and laminectomy with fusion for treating cervical spondylotic myelopathy: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial |
topic | Study Protocol |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9921403/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36765352 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-023-07123-4 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT macdowallanna comparisonofposteriormusclepreservingselectivelaminectomyandlaminectomywithfusionfortreatingcervicalspondyloticmyelopathystudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT lofgrenhakan comparisonofposteriormusclepreservingselectivelaminectomyandlaminectomywithfusionfortreatingcervicalspondyloticmyelopathystudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT edstromerik comparisonofposteriormusclepreservingselectivelaminectomyandlaminectomywithfusionfortreatingcervicalspondyloticmyelopathystudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT brisbyhelena comparisonofposteriormusclepreservingselectivelaminectomyandlaminectomywithfusionfortreatingcervicalspondyloticmyelopathystudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT paraicatharina comparisonofposteriormusclepreservingselectivelaminectomyandlaminectomywithfusionfortreatingcervicalspondyloticmyelopathystudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT elmiteranderadrian comparisonofposteriormusclepreservingselectivelaminectomyandlaminectomywithfusionfortreatingcervicalspondyloticmyelopathystudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial |