Cargando…
Do nomadic lactobacilli fit as potential vaginal probiotics? The answer lies in a successful selective multi-step and scoring approach
BACKGROUND: The goal of this study was to create a multi-strain probiotic gel that would foster a lactobacilli-dominated vaginal microbiota in pregnant women and ensure appropriate eubiosis for the newborn. Nomadic lactobacilli (95 strains), mostly isolated from food sources, were preliminarily scre...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9921609/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36774510 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12934-023-02030-4 |
_version_ | 1784887352678678528 |
---|---|
author | Cappello, Claudia Acin-Albiac, Marta Pinto, Daniela Polo, Andrea Filannino, Pasquale Rinaldi, Fabio Gobbetti, Marco Di Cagno, Raffaella |
author_facet | Cappello, Claudia Acin-Albiac, Marta Pinto, Daniela Polo, Andrea Filannino, Pasquale Rinaldi, Fabio Gobbetti, Marco Di Cagno, Raffaella |
author_sort | Cappello, Claudia |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The goal of this study was to create a multi-strain probiotic gel that would foster a lactobacilli-dominated vaginal microbiota in pregnant women and ensure appropriate eubiosis for the newborn. Nomadic lactobacilli (95 strains), mostly isolated from food sources, were preliminarily screened for functional traits before being characterized for their capability to inhibit the two vaginal pathogens Streptococcus agalactiae and Candida albicans, which may lead to adverse pregnancy-related outcomes. Eight best-performing strains were chosen and furtherly investigated for their ability to produce biofilm. Lastly, the two selected potential probiotic candidates were analyzed in vitro for their ability to reduce the inflammation caused by C. albicans infection on the reconstituted human vaginal epithelium (HVE). RESULTS: Lactiplantibacillus plantarum produced both isomers of lactic acid, while Lacticaseibacillus paracasei produced only l-isomer. The production of hydrogen peroxide was strain-dependent, with the highest concentrations found within Lact. paracasei strains. The auto-aggregation capacity and hydrophobicity traits were species-independent. S. agalactiae 88II3 was strongly inhibited both at pH 7.0 and 4.0, whereas the inhibition of C. albicans UNIBZ54 was less frequent. Overall, L. plantarum strains had the highest pathogen inhibition and functional scoring. L. plantarum C5 and POM1, which were selected as potential probiotic candidates also based on their ability to form biofilms, were able to counteract the inflammation process caused by C. albicans infection in the HVE model. CONCLUSIONS: Our multi-step and cumulative scoring-based approach was proven successful in mining and highlighting the probiotic potential of two nomadic lactobacilli strains (L. plantarum C5 and POM1), being applicable to preserve and improve human vaginal health. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9921609 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-99216092023-02-12 Do nomadic lactobacilli fit as potential vaginal probiotics? The answer lies in a successful selective multi-step and scoring approach Cappello, Claudia Acin-Albiac, Marta Pinto, Daniela Polo, Andrea Filannino, Pasquale Rinaldi, Fabio Gobbetti, Marco Di Cagno, Raffaella Microb Cell Fact Research BACKGROUND: The goal of this study was to create a multi-strain probiotic gel that would foster a lactobacilli-dominated vaginal microbiota in pregnant women and ensure appropriate eubiosis for the newborn. Nomadic lactobacilli (95 strains), mostly isolated from food sources, were preliminarily screened for functional traits before being characterized for their capability to inhibit the two vaginal pathogens Streptococcus agalactiae and Candida albicans, which may lead to adverse pregnancy-related outcomes. Eight best-performing strains were chosen and furtherly investigated for their ability to produce biofilm. Lastly, the two selected potential probiotic candidates were analyzed in vitro for their ability to reduce the inflammation caused by C. albicans infection on the reconstituted human vaginal epithelium (HVE). RESULTS: Lactiplantibacillus plantarum produced both isomers of lactic acid, while Lacticaseibacillus paracasei produced only l-isomer. The production of hydrogen peroxide was strain-dependent, with the highest concentrations found within Lact. paracasei strains. The auto-aggregation capacity and hydrophobicity traits were species-independent. S. agalactiae 88II3 was strongly inhibited both at pH 7.0 and 4.0, whereas the inhibition of C. albicans UNIBZ54 was less frequent. Overall, L. plantarum strains had the highest pathogen inhibition and functional scoring. L. plantarum C5 and POM1, which were selected as potential probiotic candidates also based on their ability to form biofilms, were able to counteract the inflammation process caused by C. albicans infection in the HVE model. CONCLUSIONS: Our multi-step and cumulative scoring-based approach was proven successful in mining and highlighting the probiotic potential of two nomadic lactobacilli strains (L. plantarum C5 and POM1), being applicable to preserve and improve human vaginal health. BioMed Central 2023-02-11 /pmc/articles/PMC9921609/ /pubmed/36774510 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12934-023-02030-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Cappello, Claudia Acin-Albiac, Marta Pinto, Daniela Polo, Andrea Filannino, Pasquale Rinaldi, Fabio Gobbetti, Marco Di Cagno, Raffaella Do nomadic lactobacilli fit as potential vaginal probiotics? The answer lies in a successful selective multi-step and scoring approach |
title | Do nomadic lactobacilli fit as potential vaginal probiotics? The answer lies in a successful selective multi-step and scoring approach |
title_full | Do nomadic lactobacilli fit as potential vaginal probiotics? The answer lies in a successful selective multi-step and scoring approach |
title_fullStr | Do nomadic lactobacilli fit as potential vaginal probiotics? The answer lies in a successful selective multi-step and scoring approach |
title_full_unstemmed | Do nomadic lactobacilli fit as potential vaginal probiotics? The answer lies in a successful selective multi-step and scoring approach |
title_short | Do nomadic lactobacilli fit as potential vaginal probiotics? The answer lies in a successful selective multi-step and scoring approach |
title_sort | do nomadic lactobacilli fit as potential vaginal probiotics? the answer lies in a successful selective multi-step and scoring approach |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9921609/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36774510 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12934-023-02030-4 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT cappelloclaudia donomadiclactobacillifitaspotentialvaginalprobioticstheanswerliesinasuccessfulselectivemultistepandscoringapproach AT acinalbiacmarta donomadiclactobacillifitaspotentialvaginalprobioticstheanswerliesinasuccessfulselectivemultistepandscoringapproach AT pintodaniela donomadiclactobacillifitaspotentialvaginalprobioticstheanswerliesinasuccessfulselectivemultistepandscoringapproach AT poloandrea donomadiclactobacillifitaspotentialvaginalprobioticstheanswerliesinasuccessfulselectivemultistepandscoringapproach AT filanninopasquale donomadiclactobacillifitaspotentialvaginalprobioticstheanswerliesinasuccessfulselectivemultistepandscoringapproach AT rinaldifabio donomadiclactobacillifitaspotentialvaginalprobioticstheanswerliesinasuccessfulselectivemultistepandscoringapproach AT gobbettimarco donomadiclactobacillifitaspotentialvaginalprobioticstheanswerliesinasuccessfulselectivemultistepandscoringapproach AT dicagnoraffaella donomadiclactobacillifitaspotentialvaginalprobioticstheanswerliesinasuccessfulselectivemultistepandscoringapproach |