Cargando…
Feasibility and efficacy of endoscopic reintervention after covered metal stent placement for EUS-guided hepaticogastrostomy: A multicenter experience
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Although the use of a long metal stent is favored for EUS-guided hepaticogastrostomy (EUS-HGS) for the relief of malignant biliary obstruction (MBO), endoscopic reintervention (E-RI) at the time of recurrent biliary obstruction (RBO) is challenging due to a long intragastr...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9921972/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36537385 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/EUS-D-22-00029 |
_version_ | 1784887440903766016 |
---|---|
author | Minaga, Kosuke Kitano, Masayuki Uenoyama, Yoshito Hatamaru, Keiichi Shiomi, Hideyuki Ikezawa, Kenji Miyagahara, Tsukasa Imai, Hajime Fujimori, Nao Matsumoto, Hisakazu Shimokawa, Yuzo Masuda, Atsuhiro Takenaka, Mamoru Kudo, Masatoshi Chiba, Yasutaka |
author_facet | Minaga, Kosuke Kitano, Masayuki Uenoyama, Yoshito Hatamaru, Keiichi Shiomi, Hideyuki Ikezawa, Kenji Miyagahara, Tsukasa Imai, Hajime Fujimori, Nao Matsumoto, Hisakazu Shimokawa, Yuzo Masuda, Atsuhiro Takenaka, Mamoru Kudo, Masatoshi Chiba, Yasutaka |
author_sort | Minaga, Kosuke |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Although the use of a long metal stent is favored for EUS-guided hepaticogastrostomy (EUS-HGS) for the relief of malignant biliary obstruction (MBO), endoscopic reintervention (E-RI) at the time of recurrent biliary obstruction (RBO) is challenging due to a long intragastric portion. This study evaluated the feasibility and safety of E-RI after a long partially covered metal stent (L-PCMS) placement during EUS-HGS. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed a multicenter retrospective study between January 2015 and December 2019 examining patients with MBO who underwent E-RI for RBO through the EUS-HGS route after the L-PCMS placement. Technical and clinical success rates, details of E-RI, adverse events (AEs), stent patency, and survival time were evaluated. RESULTS: Thirty-three patients at eight referral centers in Japan who underwent E-RI through the EUS-HGS route were enrolled. The location of MBO was distal in 54.5%. The median intragastric length of the L-PCMS was 5 cm. As the first E-RI attempt, E-RI via the distal end of the existing L-PCMS was successful in 60.6%. The overall technical and clinical success rates of E-RI were 100% and 81.8%, respectively. Liver abscess was noted in one patient. A proximal biliary stricture was associated with the clinical ineffectiveness of E-RI in multivariable analysis (odds ratio, 12.5, P = 0.04). The median survival and stent patency duration after E-RI were 140 and 394 days, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Our study findings suggest that E-RI for RBO after EUS-HGS with a L-PCMS is technically feasible and clinically effective, without any severe AEs, especially for patients with distal MBO. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9921972 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Wolters Kluwer - Medknow |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-99219722023-02-12 Feasibility and efficacy of endoscopic reintervention after covered metal stent placement for EUS-guided hepaticogastrostomy: A multicenter experience Minaga, Kosuke Kitano, Masayuki Uenoyama, Yoshito Hatamaru, Keiichi Shiomi, Hideyuki Ikezawa, Kenji Miyagahara, Tsukasa Imai, Hajime Fujimori, Nao Matsumoto, Hisakazu Shimokawa, Yuzo Masuda, Atsuhiro Takenaka, Mamoru Kudo, Masatoshi Chiba, Yasutaka Endosc Ultrasound Original Article BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Although the use of a long metal stent is favored for EUS-guided hepaticogastrostomy (EUS-HGS) for the relief of malignant biliary obstruction (MBO), endoscopic reintervention (E-RI) at the time of recurrent biliary obstruction (RBO) is challenging due to a long intragastric portion. This study evaluated the feasibility and safety of E-RI after a long partially covered metal stent (L-PCMS) placement during EUS-HGS. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed a multicenter retrospective study between January 2015 and December 2019 examining patients with MBO who underwent E-RI for RBO through the EUS-HGS route after the L-PCMS placement. Technical and clinical success rates, details of E-RI, adverse events (AEs), stent patency, and survival time were evaluated. RESULTS: Thirty-three patients at eight referral centers in Japan who underwent E-RI through the EUS-HGS route were enrolled. The location of MBO was distal in 54.5%. The median intragastric length of the L-PCMS was 5 cm. As the first E-RI attempt, E-RI via the distal end of the existing L-PCMS was successful in 60.6%. The overall technical and clinical success rates of E-RI were 100% and 81.8%, respectively. Liver abscess was noted in one patient. A proximal biliary stricture was associated with the clinical ineffectiveness of E-RI in multivariable analysis (odds ratio, 12.5, P = 0.04). The median survival and stent patency duration after E-RI were 140 and 394 days, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Our study findings suggest that E-RI for RBO after EUS-HGS with a L-PCMS is technically feasible and clinically effective, without any severe AEs, especially for patients with distal MBO. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2022-12-05 /pmc/articles/PMC9921972/ /pubmed/36537385 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/EUS-D-22-00029 Text en Copyright: © 2022 SCHOLAR MEDIA PUBLISHING https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Minaga, Kosuke Kitano, Masayuki Uenoyama, Yoshito Hatamaru, Keiichi Shiomi, Hideyuki Ikezawa, Kenji Miyagahara, Tsukasa Imai, Hajime Fujimori, Nao Matsumoto, Hisakazu Shimokawa, Yuzo Masuda, Atsuhiro Takenaka, Mamoru Kudo, Masatoshi Chiba, Yasutaka Feasibility and efficacy of endoscopic reintervention after covered metal stent placement for EUS-guided hepaticogastrostomy: A multicenter experience |
title | Feasibility and efficacy of endoscopic reintervention after covered metal stent placement for EUS-guided hepaticogastrostomy: A multicenter experience |
title_full | Feasibility and efficacy of endoscopic reintervention after covered metal stent placement for EUS-guided hepaticogastrostomy: A multicenter experience |
title_fullStr | Feasibility and efficacy of endoscopic reintervention after covered metal stent placement for EUS-guided hepaticogastrostomy: A multicenter experience |
title_full_unstemmed | Feasibility and efficacy of endoscopic reintervention after covered metal stent placement for EUS-guided hepaticogastrostomy: A multicenter experience |
title_short | Feasibility and efficacy of endoscopic reintervention after covered metal stent placement for EUS-guided hepaticogastrostomy: A multicenter experience |
title_sort | feasibility and efficacy of endoscopic reintervention after covered metal stent placement for eus-guided hepaticogastrostomy: a multicenter experience |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9921972/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36537385 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/EUS-D-22-00029 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT minagakosuke feasibilityandefficacyofendoscopicreinterventionaftercoveredmetalstentplacementforeusguidedhepaticogastrostomyamulticenterexperience AT kitanomasayuki feasibilityandefficacyofendoscopicreinterventionaftercoveredmetalstentplacementforeusguidedhepaticogastrostomyamulticenterexperience AT uenoyamayoshito feasibilityandefficacyofendoscopicreinterventionaftercoveredmetalstentplacementforeusguidedhepaticogastrostomyamulticenterexperience AT hatamarukeiichi feasibilityandefficacyofendoscopicreinterventionaftercoveredmetalstentplacementforeusguidedhepaticogastrostomyamulticenterexperience AT shiomihideyuki feasibilityandefficacyofendoscopicreinterventionaftercoveredmetalstentplacementforeusguidedhepaticogastrostomyamulticenterexperience AT ikezawakenji feasibilityandefficacyofendoscopicreinterventionaftercoveredmetalstentplacementforeusguidedhepaticogastrostomyamulticenterexperience AT miyagaharatsukasa feasibilityandefficacyofendoscopicreinterventionaftercoveredmetalstentplacementforeusguidedhepaticogastrostomyamulticenterexperience AT imaihajime feasibilityandefficacyofendoscopicreinterventionaftercoveredmetalstentplacementforeusguidedhepaticogastrostomyamulticenterexperience AT fujimorinao feasibilityandefficacyofendoscopicreinterventionaftercoveredmetalstentplacementforeusguidedhepaticogastrostomyamulticenterexperience AT matsumotohisakazu feasibilityandefficacyofendoscopicreinterventionaftercoveredmetalstentplacementforeusguidedhepaticogastrostomyamulticenterexperience AT shimokawayuzo feasibilityandefficacyofendoscopicreinterventionaftercoveredmetalstentplacementforeusguidedhepaticogastrostomyamulticenterexperience AT masudaatsuhiro feasibilityandefficacyofendoscopicreinterventionaftercoveredmetalstentplacementforeusguidedhepaticogastrostomyamulticenterexperience AT takenakamamoru feasibilityandefficacyofendoscopicreinterventionaftercoveredmetalstentplacementforeusguidedhepaticogastrostomyamulticenterexperience AT kudomasatoshi feasibilityandefficacyofendoscopicreinterventionaftercoveredmetalstentplacementforeusguidedhepaticogastrostomyamulticenterexperience AT chibayasutaka feasibilityandefficacyofendoscopicreinterventionaftercoveredmetalstentplacementforeusguidedhepaticogastrostomyamulticenterexperience |