Cargando…

Feasibility and efficacy of endoscopic reintervention after covered metal stent placement for EUS-guided hepaticogastrostomy: A multicenter experience

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Although the use of a long metal stent is favored for EUS-guided hepaticogastrostomy (EUS-HGS) for the relief of malignant biliary obstruction (MBO), endoscopic reintervention (E-RI) at the time of recurrent biliary obstruction (RBO) is challenging due to a long intragastr...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Minaga, Kosuke, Kitano, Masayuki, Uenoyama, Yoshito, Hatamaru, Keiichi, Shiomi, Hideyuki, Ikezawa, Kenji, Miyagahara, Tsukasa, Imai, Hajime, Fujimori, Nao, Matsumoto, Hisakazu, Shimokawa, Yuzo, Masuda, Atsuhiro, Takenaka, Mamoru, Kudo, Masatoshi, Chiba, Yasutaka
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9921972/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36537385
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/EUS-D-22-00029
_version_ 1784887440903766016
author Minaga, Kosuke
Kitano, Masayuki
Uenoyama, Yoshito
Hatamaru, Keiichi
Shiomi, Hideyuki
Ikezawa, Kenji
Miyagahara, Tsukasa
Imai, Hajime
Fujimori, Nao
Matsumoto, Hisakazu
Shimokawa, Yuzo
Masuda, Atsuhiro
Takenaka, Mamoru
Kudo, Masatoshi
Chiba, Yasutaka
author_facet Minaga, Kosuke
Kitano, Masayuki
Uenoyama, Yoshito
Hatamaru, Keiichi
Shiomi, Hideyuki
Ikezawa, Kenji
Miyagahara, Tsukasa
Imai, Hajime
Fujimori, Nao
Matsumoto, Hisakazu
Shimokawa, Yuzo
Masuda, Atsuhiro
Takenaka, Mamoru
Kudo, Masatoshi
Chiba, Yasutaka
author_sort Minaga, Kosuke
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Although the use of a long metal stent is favored for EUS-guided hepaticogastrostomy (EUS-HGS) for the relief of malignant biliary obstruction (MBO), endoscopic reintervention (E-RI) at the time of recurrent biliary obstruction (RBO) is challenging due to a long intragastric portion. This study evaluated the feasibility and safety of E-RI after a long partially covered metal stent (L-PCMS) placement during EUS-HGS. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed a multicenter retrospective study between January 2015 and December 2019 examining patients with MBO who underwent E-RI for RBO through the EUS-HGS route after the L-PCMS placement. Technical and clinical success rates, details of E-RI, adverse events (AEs), stent patency, and survival time were evaluated. RESULTS: Thirty-three patients at eight referral centers in Japan who underwent E-RI through the EUS-HGS route were enrolled. The location of MBO was distal in 54.5%. The median intragastric length of the L-PCMS was 5 cm. As the first E-RI attempt, E-RI via the distal end of the existing L-PCMS was successful in 60.6%. The overall technical and clinical success rates of E-RI were 100% and 81.8%, respectively. Liver abscess was noted in one patient. A proximal biliary stricture was associated with the clinical ineffectiveness of E-RI in multivariable analysis (odds ratio, 12.5, P = 0.04). The median survival and stent patency duration after E-RI were 140 and 394 days, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Our study findings suggest that E-RI for RBO after EUS-HGS with a L-PCMS is technically feasible and clinically effective, without any severe AEs, especially for patients with distal MBO.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9921972
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-99219722023-02-12 Feasibility and efficacy of endoscopic reintervention after covered metal stent placement for EUS-guided hepaticogastrostomy: A multicenter experience Minaga, Kosuke Kitano, Masayuki Uenoyama, Yoshito Hatamaru, Keiichi Shiomi, Hideyuki Ikezawa, Kenji Miyagahara, Tsukasa Imai, Hajime Fujimori, Nao Matsumoto, Hisakazu Shimokawa, Yuzo Masuda, Atsuhiro Takenaka, Mamoru Kudo, Masatoshi Chiba, Yasutaka Endosc Ultrasound Original Article BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Although the use of a long metal stent is favored for EUS-guided hepaticogastrostomy (EUS-HGS) for the relief of malignant biliary obstruction (MBO), endoscopic reintervention (E-RI) at the time of recurrent biliary obstruction (RBO) is challenging due to a long intragastric portion. This study evaluated the feasibility and safety of E-RI after a long partially covered metal stent (L-PCMS) placement during EUS-HGS. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed a multicenter retrospective study between January 2015 and December 2019 examining patients with MBO who underwent E-RI for RBO through the EUS-HGS route after the L-PCMS placement. Technical and clinical success rates, details of E-RI, adverse events (AEs), stent patency, and survival time were evaluated. RESULTS: Thirty-three patients at eight referral centers in Japan who underwent E-RI through the EUS-HGS route were enrolled. The location of MBO was distal in 54.5%. The median intragastric length of the L-PCMS was 5 cm. As the first E-RI attempt, E-RI via the distal end of the existing L-PCMS was successful in 60.6%. The overall technical and clinical success rates of E-RI were 100% and 81.8%, respectively. Liver abscess was noted in one patient. A proximal biliary stricture was associated with the clinical ineffectiveness of E-RI in multivariable analysis (odds ratio, 12.5, P = 0.04). The median survival and stent patency duration after E-RI were 140 and 394 days, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Our study findings suggest that E-RI for RBO after EUS-HGS with a L-PCMS is technically feasible and clinically effective, without any severe AEs, especially for patients with distal MBO. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2022-12-05 /pmc/articles/PMC9921972/ /pubmed/36537385 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/EUS-D-22-00029 Text en Copyright: © 2022 SCHOLAR MEDIA PUBLISHING https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Minaga, Kosuke
Kitano, Masayuki
Uenoyama, Yoshito
Hatamaru, Keiichi
Shiomi, Hideyuki
Ikezawa, Kenji
Miyagahara, Tsukasa
Imai, Hajime
Fujimori, Nao
Matsumoto, Hisakazu
Shimokawa, Yuzo
Masuda, Atsuhiro
Takenaka, Mamoru
Kudo, Masatoshi
Chiba, Yasutaka
Feasibility and efficacy of endoscopic reintervention after covered metal stent placement for EUS-guided hepaticogastrostomy: A multicenter experience
title Feasibility and efficacy of endoscopic reintervention after covered metal stent placement for EUS-guided hepaticogastrostomy: A multicenter experience
title_full Feasibility and efficacy of endoscopic reintervention after covered metal stent placement for EUS-guided hepaticogastrostomy: A multicenter experience
title_fullStr Feasibility and efficacy of endoscopic reintervention after covered metal stent placement for EUS-guided hepaticogastrostomy: A multicenter experience
title_full_unstemmed Feasibility and efficacy of endoscopic reintervention after covered metal stent placement for EUS-guided hepaticogastrostomy: A multicenter experience
title_short Feasibility and efficacy of endoscopic reintervention after covered metal stent placement for EUS-guided hepaticogastrostomy: A multicenter experience
title_sort feasibility and efficacy of endoscopic reintervention after covered metal stent placement for eus-guided hepaticogastrostomy: a multicenter experience
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9921972/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36537385
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/EUS-D-22-00029
work_keys_str_mv AT minagakosuke feasibilityandefficacyofendoscopicreinterventionaftercoveredmetalstentplacementforeusguidedhepaticogastrostomyamulticenterexperience
AT kitanomasayuki feasibilityandefficacyofendoscopicreinterventionaftercoveredmetalstentplacementforeusguidedhepaticogastrostomyamulticenterexperience
AT uenoyamayoshito feasibilityandefficacyofendoscopicreinterventionaftercoveredmetalstentplacementforeusguidedhepaticogastrostomyamulticenterexperience
AT hatamarukeiichi feasibilityandefficacyofendoscopicreinterventionaftercoveredmetalstentplacementforeusguidedhepaticogastrostomyamulticenterexperience
AT shiomihideyuki feasibilityandefficacyofendoscopicreinterventionaftercoveredmetalstentplacementforeusguidedhepaticogastrostomyamulticenterexperience
AT ikezawakenji feasibilityandefficacyofendoscopicreinterventionaftercoveredmetalstentplacementforeusguidedhepaticogastrostomyamulticenterexperience
AT miyagaharatsukasa feasibilityandefficacyofendoscopicreinterventionaftercoveredmetalstentplacementforeusguidedhepaticogastrostomyamulticenterexperience
AT imaihajime feasibilityandefficacyofendoscopicreinterventionaftercoveredmetalstentplacementforeusguidedhepaticogastrostomyamulticenterexperience
AT fujimorinao feasibilityandefficacyofendoscopicreinterventionaftercoveredmetalstentplacementforeusguidedhepaticogastrostomyamulticenterexperience
AT matsumotohisakazu feasibilityandefficacyofendoscopicreinterventionaftercoveredmetalstentplacementforeusguidedhepaticogastrostomyamulticenterexperience
AT shimokawayuzo feasibilityandefficacyofendoscopicreinterventionaftercoveredmetalstentplacementforeusguidedhepaticogastrostomyamulticenterexperience
AT masudaatsuhiro feasibilityandefficacyofendoscopicreinterventionaftercoveredmetalstentplacementforeusguidedhepaticogastrostomyamulticenterexperience
AT takenakamamoru feasibilityandefficacyofendoscopicreinterventionaftercoveredmetalstentplacementforeusguidedhepaticogastrostomyamulticenterexperience
AT kudomasatoshi feasibilityandefficacyofendoscopicreinterventionaftercoveredmetalstentplacementforeusguidedhepaticogastrostomyamulticenterexperience
AT chibayasutaka feasibilityandefficacyofendoscopicreinterventionaftercoveredmetalstentplacementforeusguidedhepaticogastrostomyamulticenterexperience