Cargando…

Prophylactic ECMO Support during Elective Coronary Percutaneous Interventions in High-Risk Patients: A Single-Center Experience

INTRODUCTION: Evidence regarding the impact of prophylactic implantation of venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) for elective high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is limited. The purpose of this paper is to evaluate the outcome during index hospitalization and 3 y...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ungureanu, Claudiu, Blaimont, Marc, Trine, Hugues, Henin, Pierre, Courcelle, Romain, Laurent, Yves, Van Ruyssevelt, Patrick, Lepièce, Caroline, Huberlant, Vincent
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9922177/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36793669
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2023/5332038
_version_ 1784887486336466944
author Ungureanu, Claudiu
Blaimont, Marc
Trine, Hugues
Henin, Pierre
Courcelle, Romain
Laurent, Yves
Van Ruyssevelt, Patrick
Lepièce, Caroline
Huberlant, Vincent
author_facet Ungureanu, Claudiu
Blaimont, Marc
Trine, Hugues
Henin, Pierre
Courcelle, Romain
Laurent, Yves
Van Ruyssevelt, Patrick
Lepièce, Caroline
Huberlant, Vincent
author_sort Ungureanu, Claudiu
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Evidence regarding the impact of prophylactic implantation of venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) for elective high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is limited. The purpose of this paper is to evaluate the outcome during index hospitalization and 3 years after interventions. METHODS: This is an observational retrospective study including all patients undergoing elective, high-risk PCI and receiving VA-ECMO for cardiopulmonary support. Primary endpoints were in-hospital and 3- year major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular event (MACCE) rates. Secondary endpoints were vascular complications, bleeding, and procedural success. RESULTS: Nine patients were included in total. All patients were considered inoperable by the local heart team, and 1 patient had a previous coronary artery bypass graft (CABG). All patients were hospitalized for an acute heart failure episode 30 days before the index procedure. Severe left ventricular dysfunction was present in 8 patients. The main target vessel was the left main coronary artery in 5 cases. Complex PCI techniques were used: bifurcations with 2 stents in 8 patients, rotational atherectomy was performed in 3, and coronary lithoplasty in 1 case. PCI was successful in all of the patients with revascularization of all target and additional lesions. Eight of the 9 patients survived for at least 30 days after the procedure, and 7 patients survived for 3 years after the procedure. Regarding the complication rate, 2 patients suffered from limb ischemia and were treated by an antegrade perfusion, 1 patient had a femoral perforation that needed surgical repair, 6 patients had a hematoma, 5 patients had a significant drop in hemoglobin of more than 2 g/dl and received blood transfusions, 2 patients were treated for septicemia, and 2 patients needed hemodialysis. CONCLUSIONS: Prophylactic use of VA-ECMO in elective patients is an acceptable strategy for revascularization by high-risk coronary percutaneous interventions with good long-term outcomes for patients considered inoperable when a clear clinical benefit is expected. Regarding the potential risk of complications due to a VA-ECMO system, the selection of candidates in our series was based on a multiparameter analysis. The two main triggers in favor of prophylactic VA-ECMO in our studies were the presence of a recent heart failure episode and the high probability of periprocedural prolonged impairment of the coronary flow through the major epicardial artery.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9922177
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Hindawi
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-99221772023-02-14 Prophylactic ECMO Support during Elective Coronary Percutaneous Interventions in High-Risk Patients: A Single-Center Experience Ungureanu, Claudiu Blaimont, Marc Trine, Hugues Henin, Pierre Courcelle, Romain Laurent, Yves Van Ruyssevelt, Patrick Lepièce, Caroline Huberlant, Vincent J Interv Cardiol Research Article INTRODUCTION: Evidence regarding the impact of prophylactic implantation of venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) for elective high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is limited. The purpose of this paper is to evaluate the outcome during index hospitalization and 3 years after interventions. METHODS: This is an observational retrospective study including all patients undergoing elective, high-risk PCI and receiving VA-ECMO for cardiopulmonary support. Primary endpoints were in-hospital and 3- year major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular event (MACCE) rates. Secondary endpoints were vascular complications, bleeding, and procedural success. RESULTS: Nine patients were included in total. All patients were considered inoperable by the local heart team, and 1 patient had a previous coronary artery bypass graft (CABG). All patients were hospitalized for an acute heart failure episode 30 days before the index procedure. Severe left ventricular dysfunction was present in 8 patients. The main target vessel was the left main coronary artery in 5 cases. Complex PCI techniques were used: bifurcations with 2 stents in 8 patients, rotational atherectomy was performed in 3, and coronary lithoplasty in 1 case. PCI was successful in all of the patients with revascularization of all target and additional lesions. Eight of the 9 patients survived for at least 30 days after the procedure, and 7 patients survived for 3 years after the procedure. Regarding the complication rate, 2 patients suffered from limb ischemia and were treated by an antegrade perfusion, 1 patient had a femoral perforation that needed surgical repair, 6 patients had a hematoma, 5 patients had a significant drop in hemoglobin of more than 2 g/dl and received blood transfusions, 2 patients were treated for septicemia, and 2 patients needed hemodialysis. CONCLUSIONS: Prophylactic use of VA-ECMO in elective patients is an acceptable strategy for revascularization by high-risk coronary percutaneous interventions with good long-term outcomes for patients considered inoperable when a clear clinical benefit is expected. Regarding the potential risk of complications due to a VA-ECMO system, the selection of candidates in our series was based on a multiparameter analysis. The two main triggers in favor of prophylactic VA-ECMO in our studies were the presence of a recent heart failure episode and the high probability of periprocedural prolonged impairment of the coronary flow through the major epicardial artery. Hindawi 2023-02-04 /pmc/articles/PMC9922177/ /pubmed/36793669 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2023/5332038 Text en Copyright © 2023 Claudiu Ungureanu et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Ungureanu, Claudiu
Blaimont, Marc
Trine, Hugues
Henin, Pierre
Courcelle, Romain
Laurent, Yves
Van Ruyssevelt, Patrick
Lepièce, Caroline
Huberlant, Vincent
Prophylactic ECMO Support during Elective Coronary Percutaneous Interventions in High-Risk Patients: A Single-Center Experience
title Prophylactic ECMO Support during Elective Coronary Percutaneous Interventions in High-Risk Patients: A Single-Center Experience
title_full Prophylactic ECMO Support during Elective Coronary Percutaneous Interventions in High-Risk Patients: A Single-Center Experience
title_fullStr Prophylactic ECMO Support during Elective Coronary Percutaneous Interventions in High-Risk Patients: A Single-Center Experience
title_full_unstemmed Prophylactic ECMO Support during Elective Coronary Percutaneous Interventions in High-Risk Patients: A Single-Center Experience
title_short Prophylactic ECMO Support during Elective Coronary Percutaneous Interventions in High-Risk Patients: A Single-Center Experience
title_sort prophylactic ecmo support during elective coronary percutaneous interventions in high-risk patients: a single-center experience
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9922177/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36793669
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2023/5332038
work_keys_str_mv AT ungureanuclaudiu prophylacticecmosupportduringelectivecoronarypercutaneousinterventionsinhighriskpatientsasinglecenterexperience
AT blaimontmarc prophylacticecmosupportduringelectivecoronarypercutaneousinterventionsinhighriskpatientsasinglecenterexperience
AT trinehugues prophylacticecmosupportduringelectivecoronarypercutaneousinterventionsinhighriskpatientsasinglecenterexperience
AT heninpierre prophylacticecmosupportduringelectivecoronarypercutaneousinterventionsinhighriskpatientsasinglecenterexperience
AT courcelleromain prophylacticecmosupportduringelectivecoronarypercutaneousinterventionsinhighriskpatientsasinglecenterexperience
AT laurentyves prophylacticecmosupportduringelectivecoronarypercutaneousinterventionsinhighriskpatientsasinglecenterexperience
AT vanruysseveltpatrick prophylacticecmosupportduringelectivecoronarypercutaneousinterventionsinhighriskpatientsasinglecenterexperience
AT lepiececaroline prophylacticecmosupportduringelectivecoronarypercutaneousinterventionsinhighriskpatientsasinglecenterexperience
AT huberlantvincent prophylacticecmosupportduringelectivecoronarypercutaneousinterventionsinhighriskpatientsasinglecenterexperience