Impact of KRAS Mutation on Survival Outcome of Patients With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer in Jordan

Background Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the most prevalent cancer in males, with an incidence rate (IR) of 13.1%, and the second most prevalent cancer in females, with an IR of 8.4%, coming after breast cancer in Jordan. The present study was motivated by conflicting clinical data regarding the prognostic impact of Kirsten rat sarcoma viral oncogene homolog (KRAS) mutation in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Our study aimed to investigate if KRAS mutation conferred a negative prognostic value in Jordanian patients with mCRC. Materials and methods The current study is a retrospective study that collected data from a cohort of 135 mCRC patients diagnosed between 1 January 2017 and 1 January 2022 at our Oncology Department at the Jordanian Military Cancer Center (MCAC) using our patients' electronic medical records. The last follow-up date was 1 September 2022. From the cohort, we obtained data regarding age, sex, date of diagnosis, metastatic spread, KRAS status, either mutated KRAS or wild-type KRAS, and location of the primary tumor. All patients underwent tumor tissue biopsies to determine KRAS mutational status based on quantitative polymerase chain reaction and reverse hybridization from an accredited diagnostic laboratory at Jordan University Hospital. Statistical analysis was carried out to address the associations between KRAS mutation and the patients-tumor characteristics and their prognosis on survival. Results KRAS mutation was found in 40.3% of the participants in the study, and 56.7% had the wild type. There was a predilection of KRAS mutation, with 67% on the right side versus 33% on the left side (p = 0.018). Kaplan-Meier survival analysis showed worse survival outcomes in KRAS mutant patients (p = 0.002). The median overall survival in the KRAS mutant patients was 17 months (95% confidence interval (CI): 13.762-19.273) compared to 21 months (95% CI: 20.507-27.648) in patients with wild-type KRAS. Additionally, the Cox regression model identified that KRAS mutation carries a poorer prognosis on survival outcome hazard ratio (HR: 2.045, 95% CI: 1.291-3.237, p = 0.002). The test also showed statistical significance in the metastatic site (lung only). But this time, it was associated with a better survival outcome (HR: 0.383, 95% CI: 0.186-0.788, p = 0.009). Conclusion The present study shows that the presence of KRAS mutation has been found to negatively impact the prognosis and survival outcome of Jordanian patients with mCRC.