Cargando…

Optimal discharge planning for esophagectomy patients with enhanced recovery after surgery: Recommendations

BACKGROUND: Studies have suggested that the postoperative length of stay (PLOS) of esophagectomy patients under the enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) pathway should be >10 days as against the previously recommended 7 days. We investigated the distribution and influencing factors of PLOS in t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Li, Kunzhi, Wang, Kangning, Wei, Xing, Leng, Xuefeng, Fang, Qiang
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9922840/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36793310
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2023.1112675
_version_ 1784887615301877760
author Li, Kunzhi
Wang, Kangning
Wei, Xing
Leng, Xuefeng
Fang, Qiang
author_facet Li, Kunzhi
Wang, Kangning
Wei, Xing
Leng, Xuefeng
Fang, Qiang
author_sort Li, Kunzhi
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Studies have suggested that the postoperative length of stay (PLOS) of esophagectomy patients under the enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) pathway should be >10 days as against the previously recommended 7 days. We investigated the distribution and influencing factors of PLOS in the ERAS pathway in order to recommend an optimal planned discharge time. METHODS: This was a single-center retrospective study of 449 patients with thoracic esophageal carcinoma who underwent esophagectomy and perioperative ERAS between January 2013 and April 2021. We established a database to prospectively document the causes of delayed discharge. RESULTS: The mean and median PLOS were 10.2 days and 8.0 days (range: 5–97), respectively. Patients were divided into four groups: group A (PLOS ≤ 7 days), 179 patients (39.9%); group B (8 ≤ PLOS ≤ 10 days), 152 (33.9%); group C (11 ≤ PLOS ≤ 14 days), 68 (15.1%); group D (PLOS > 14 days), 50 patients (11.1%). The main cause of prolonged PLOS in group B was minor complications (prolonged chest drainage, pulmonary infection, recurrent laryngeal nerve injury). Severely prolonged PLOS in groups C and D were due to major complications and comorbidities. On multivariable logistic regression analysis, open surgery, surgical duration >240 min, age >64 years, surgical complication grade >2, and critical comorbidities were identified as risk factors for delayed discharge. CONCLUSIONS: The optimal planned discharge time for patients undergoing esophagectomy with ERAS should be 7–10 days with a 4-day discharge observation window. Patients at risk of delayed discharge should be managed adopting PLOS prediction.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9922840
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-99228402023-02-14 Optimal discharge planning for esophagectomy patients with enhanced recovery after surgery: Recommendations Li, Kunzhi Wang, Kangning Wei, Xing Leng, Xuefeng Fang, Qiang Front Surg Surgery BACKGROUND: Studies have suggested that the postoperative length of stay (PLOS) of esophagectomy patients under the enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) pathway should be >10 days as against the previously recommended 7 days. We investigated the distribution and influencing factors of PLOS in the ERAS pathway in order to recommend an optimal planned discharge time. METHODS: This was a single-center retrospective study of 449 patients with thoracic esophageal carcinoma who underwent esophagectomy and perioperative ERAS between January 2013 and April 2021. We established a database to prospectively document the causes of delayed discharge. RESULTS: The mean and median PLOS were 10.2 days and 8.0 days (range: 5–97), respectively. Patients were divided into four groups: group A (PLOS ≤ 7 days), 179 patients (39.9%); group B (8 ≤ PLOS ≤ 10 days), 152 (33.9%); group C (11 ≤ PLOS ≤ 14 days), 68 (15.1%); group D (PLOS > 14 days), 50 patients (11.1%). The main cause of prolonged PLOS in group B was minor complications (prolonged chest drainage, pulmonary infection, recurrent laryngeal nerve injury). Severely prolonged PLOS in groups C and D were due to major complications and comorbidities. On multivariable logistic regression analysis, open surgery, surgical duration >240 min, age >64 years, surgical complication grade >2, and critical comorbidities were identified as risk factors for delayed discharge. CONCLUSIONS: The optimal planned discharge time for patients undergoing esophagectomy with ERAS should be 7–10 days with a 4-day discharge observation window. Patients at risk of delayed discharge should be managed adopting PLOS prediction. Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-01-30 /pmc/articles/PMC9922840/ /pubmed/36793310 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2023.1112675 Text en © 2023 Li, Wang, Wei, Leng and Fang. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Surgery
Li, Kunzhi
Wang, Kangning
Wei, Xing
Leng, Xuefeng
Fang, Qiang
Optimal discharge planning for esophagectomy patients with enhanced recovery after surgery: Recommendations
title Optimal discharge planning for esophagectomy patients with enhanced recovery after surgery: Recommendations
title_full Optimal discharge planning for esophagectomy patients with enhanced recovery after surgery: Recommendations
title_fullStr Optimal discharge planning for esophagectomy patients with enhanced recovery after surgery: Recommendations
title_full_unstemmed Optimal discharge planning for esophagectomy patients with enhanced recovery after surgery: Recommendations
title_short Optimal discharge planning for esophagectomy patients with enhanced recovery after surgery: Recommendations
title_sort optimal discharge planning for esophagectomy patients with enhanced recovery after surgery: recommendations
topic Surgery
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9922840/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36793310
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2023.1112675
work_keys_str_mv AT likunzhi optimaldischargeplanningforesophagectomypatientswithenhancedrecoveryaftersurgeryrecommendations
AT wangkangning optimaldischargeplanningforesophagectomypatientswithenhancedrecoveryaftersurgeryrecommendations
AT weixing optimaldischargeplanningforesophagectomypatientswithenhancedrecoveryaftersurgeryrecommendations
AT lengxuefeng optimaldischargeplanningforesophagectomypatientswithenhancedrecoveryaftersurgeryrecommendations
AT fangqiang optimaldischargeplanningforesophagectomypatientswithenhancedrecoveryaftersurgeryrecommendations