Cargando…
Optimal discharge planning for esophagectomy patients with enhanced recovery after surgery: Recommendations
BACKGROUND: Studies have suggested that the postoperative length of stay (PLOS) of esophagectomy patients under the enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) pathway should be >10 days as against the previously recommended 7 days. We investigated the distribution and influencing factors of PLOS in t...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9922840/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36793310 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2023.1112675 |
_version_ | 1784887615301877760 |
---|---|
author | Li, Kunzhi Wang, Kangning Wei, Xing Leng, Xuefeng Fang, Qiang |
author_facet | Li, Kunzhi Wang, Kangning Wei, Xing Leng, Xuefeng Fang, Qiang |
author_sort | Li, Kunzhi |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Studies have suggested that the postoperative length of stay (PLOS) of esophagectomy patients under the enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) pathway should be >10 days as against the previously recommended 7 days. We investigated the distribution and influencing factors of PLOS in the ERAS pathway in order to recommend an optimal planned discharge time. METHODS: This was a single-center retrospective study of 449 patients with thoracic esophageal carcinoma who underwent esophagectomy and perioperative ERAS between January 2013 and April 2021. We established a database to prospectively document the causes of delayed discharge. RESULTS: The mean and median PLOS were 10.2 days and 8.0 days (range: 5–97), respectively. Patients were divided into four groups: group A (PLOS ≤ 7 days), 179 patients (39.9%); group B (8 ≤ PLOS ≤ 10 days), 152 (33.9%); group C (11 ≤ PLOS ≤ 14 days), 68 (15.1%); group D (PLOS > 14 days), 50 patients (11.1%). The main cause of prolonged PLOS in group B was minor complications (prolonged chest drainage, pulmonary infection, recurrent laryngeal nerve injury). Severely prolonged PLOS in groups C and D were due to major complications and comorbidities. On multivariable logistic regression analysis, open surgery, surgical duration >240 min, age >64 years, surgical complication grade >2, and critical comorbidities were identified as risk factors for delayed discharge. CONCLUSIONS: The optimal planned discharge time for patients undergoing esophagectomy with ERAS should be 7–10 days with a 4-day discharge observation window. Patients at risk of delayed discharge should be managed adopting PLOS prediction. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9922840 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-99228402023-02-14 Optimal discharge planning for esophagectomy patients with enhanced recovery after surgery: Recommendations Li, Kunzhi Wang, Kangning Wei, Xing Leng, Xuefeng Fang, Qiang Front Surg Surgery BACKGROUND: Studies have suggested that the postoperative length of stay (PLOS) of esophagectomy patients under the enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) pathway should be >10 days as against the previously recommended 7 days. We investigated the distribution and influencing factors of PLOS in the ERAS pathway in order to recommend an optimal planned discharge time. METHODS: This was a single-center retrospective study of 449 patients with thoracic esophageal carcinoma who underwent esophagectomy and perioperative ERAS between January 2013 and April 2021. We established a database to prospectively document the causes of delayed discharge. RESULTS: The mean and median PLOS were 10.2 days and 8.0 days (range: 5–97), respectively. Patients were divided into four groups: group A (PLOS ≤ 7 days), 179 patients (39.9%); group B (8 ≤ PLOS ≤ 10 days), 152 (33.9%); group C (11 ≤ PLOS ≤ 14 days), 68 (15.1%); group D (PLOS > 14 days), 50 patients (11.1%). The main cause of prolonged PLOS in group B was minor complications (prolonged chest drainage, pulmonary infection, recurrent laryngeal nerve injury). Severely prolonged PLOS in groups C and D were due to major complications and comorbidities. On multivariable logistic regression analysis, open surgery, surgical duration >240 min, age >64 years, surgical complication grade >2, and critical comorbidities were identified as risk factors for delayed discharge. CONCLUSIONS: The optimal planned discharge time for patients undergoing esophagectomy with ERAS should be 7–10 days with a 4-day discharge observation window. Patients at risk of delayed discharge should be managed adopting PLOS prediction. Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-01-30 /pmc/articles/PMC9922840/ /pubmed/36793310 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2023.1112675 Text en © 2023 Li, Wang, Wei, Leng and Fang. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Surgery Li, Kunzhi Wang, Kangning Wei, Xing Leng, Xuefeng Fang, Qiang Optimal discharge planning for esophagectomy patients with enhanced recovery after surgery: Recommendations |
title | Optimal discharge planning for esophagectomy patients with enhanced recovery after surgery: Recommendations |
title_full | Optimal discharge planning for esophagectomy patients with enhanced recovery after surgery: Recommendations |
title_fullStr | Optimal discharge planning for esophagectomy patients with enhanced recovery after surgery: Recommendations |
title_full_unstemmed | Optimal discharge planning for esophagectomy patients with enhanced recovery after surgery: Recommendations |
title_short | Optimal discharge planning for esophagectomy patients with enhanced recovery after surgery: Recommendations |
title_sort | optimal discharge planning for esophagectomy patients with enhanced recovery after surgery: recommendations |
topic | Surgery |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9922840/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36793310 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2023.1112675 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT likunzhi optimaldischargeplanningforesophagectomypatientswithenhancedrecoveryaftersurgeryrecommendations AT wangkangning optimaldischargeplanningforesophagectomypatientswithenhancedrecoveryaftersurgeryrecommendations AT weixing optimaldischargeplanningforesophagectomypatientswithenhancedrecoveryaftersurgeryrecommendations AT lengxuefeng optimaldischargeplanningforesophagectomypatientswithenhancedrecoveryaftersurgeryrecommendations AT fangqiang optimaldischargeplanningforesophagectomypatientswithenhancedrecoveryaftersurgeryrecommendations |