Cargando…
Grounding human-object interaction to affordance behavior in multimodal datasets
While affordance detection and Human-Object interaction (HOI) detection tasks are related, the theoretical foundation of affordances makes it clear that the two are distinct. In particular, researchers in affordances make distinctions between J. J. Gibson's traditional definition of an affordan...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9923013/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36793938 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/frai.2023.1084740 |
_version_ | 1784887656353628160 |
---|---|
author | Henlein, Alexander Gopinath, Anju Krishnaswamy, Nikhil Mehler, Alexander Pustejovsky, James |
author_facet | Henlein, Alexander Gopinath, Anju Krishnaswamy, Nikhil Mehler, Alexander Pustejovsky, James |
author_sort | Henlein, Alexander |
collection | PubMed |
description | While affordance detection and Human-Object interaction (HOI) detection tasks are related, the theoretical foundation of affordances makes it clear that the two are distinct. In particular, researchers in affordances make distinctions between J. J. Gibson's traditional definition of an affordance, “the action possibilities” of the object within the environment, and the definition of a telic affordance, or one defined by conventionalized purpose or use. We augment the HICO-DET dataset with annotations for Gibsonian and telic affordances and a subset of the dataset with annotations for the orientation of the humans and objects involved. We then train an adapted Human-Object Interaction (HOI) model and evaluate a pre-trained viewpoint estimation system on this augmented dataset. Our model, AffordanceUPT, is based on a two-stage adaptation of the Unary-Pairwise Transformer (UPT), which we modularize to make affordance detection independent of object detection. Our approach exhibits generalization to new objects and actions, can effectively make the Gibsonian/telic distinction, and shows that this distinction is correlated with features in the data that are not captured by the HOI annotations of the HICO-DET dataset. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9923013 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-99230132023-02-14 Grounding human-object interaction to affordance behavior in multimodal datasets Henlein, Alexander Gopinath, Anju Krishnaswamy, Nikhil Mehler, Alexander Pustejovsky, James Front Artif Intell Artificial Intelligence While affordance detection and Human-Object interaction (HOI) detection tasks are related, the theoretical foundation of affordances makes it clear that the two are distinct. In particular, researchers in affordances make distinctions between J. J. Gibson's traditional definition of an affordance, “the action possibilities” of the object within the environment, and the definition of a telic affordance, or one defined by conventionalized purpose or use. We augment the HICO-DET dataset with annotations for Gibsonian and telic affordances and a subset of the dataset with annotations for the orientation of the humans and objects involved. We then train an adapted Human-Object Interaction (HOI) model and evaluate a pre-trained viewpoint estimation system on this augmented dataset. Our model, AffordanceUPT, is based on a two-stage adaptation of the Unary-Pairwise Transformer (UPT), which we modularize to make affordance detection independent of object detection. Our approach exhibits generalization to new objects and actions, can effectively make the Gibsonian/telic distinction, and shows that this distinction is correlated with features in the data that are not captured by the HOI annotations of the HICO-DET dataset. Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-01-30 /pmc/articles/PMC9923013/ /pubmed/36793938 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/frai.2023.1084740 Text en Copyright © 2023 Henlein, Gopinath, Krishnaswamy, Mehler and Pustejovsky. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Artificial Intelligence Henlein, Alexander Gopinath, Anju Krishnaswamy, Nikhil Mehler, Alexander Pustejovsky, James Grounding human-object interaction to affordance behavior in multimodal datasets |
title | Grounding human-object interaction to affordance behavior in multimodal datasets |
title_full | Grounding human-object interaction to affordance behavior in multimodal datasets |
title_fullStr | Grounding human-object interaction to affordance behavior in multimodal datasets |
title_full_unstemmed | Grounding human-object interaction to affordance behavior in multimodal datasets |
title_short | Grounding human-object interaction to affordance behavior in multimodal datasets |
title_sort | grounding human-object interaction to affordance behavior in multimodal datasets |
topic | Artificial Intelligence |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9923013/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36793938 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/frai.2023.1084740 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT henleinalexander groundinghumanobjectinteractiontoaffordancebehaviorinmultimodaldatasets AT gopinathanju groundinghumanobjectinteractiontoaffordancebehaviorinmultimodaldatasets AT krishnaswamynikhil groundinghumanobjectinteractiontoaffordancebehaviorinmultimodaldatasets AT mehleralexander groundinghumanobjectinteractiontoaffordancebehaviorinmultimodaldatasets AT pustejovskyjames groundinghumanobjectinteractiontoaffordancebehaviorinmultimodaldatasets |