Cargando…

Grounding human-object interaction to affordance behavior in multimodal datasets

While affordance detection and Human-Object interaction (HOI) detection tasks are related, the theoretical foundation of affordances makes it clear that the two are distinct. In particular, researchers in affordances make distinctions between J. J. Gibson's traditional definition of an affordan...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Henlein, Alexander, Gopinath, Anju, Krishnaswamy, Nikhil, Mehler, Alexander, Pustejovsky, James
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9923013/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36793938
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/frai.2023.1084740
_version_ 1784887656353628160
author Henlein, Alexander
Gopinath, Anju
Krishnaswamy, Nikhil
Mehler, Alexander
Pustejovsky, James
author_facet Henlein, Alexander
Gopinath, Anju
Krishnaswamy, Nikhil
Mehler, Alexander
Pustejovsky, James
author_sort Henlein, Alexander
collection PubMed
description While affordance detection and Human-Object interaction (HOI) detection tasks are related, the theoretical foundation of affordances makes it clear that the two are distinct. In particular, researchers in affordances make distinctions between J. J. Gibson's traditional definition of an affordance, “the action possibilities” of the object within the environment, and the definition of a telic affordance, or one defined by conventionalized purpose or use. We augment the HICO-DET dataset with annotations for Gibsonian and telic affordances and a subset of the dataset with annotations for the orientation of the humans and objects involved. We then train an adapted Human-Object Interaction (HOI) model and evaluate a pre-trained viewpoint estimation system on this augmented dataset. Our model, AffordanceUPT, is based on a two-stage adaptation of the Unary-Pairwise Transformer (UPT), which we modularize to make affordance detection independent of object detection. Our approach exhibits generalization to new objects and actions, can effectively make the Gibsonian/telic distinction, and shows that this distinction is correlated with features in the data that are not captured by the HOI annotations of the HICO-DET dataset.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9923013
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-99230132023-02-14 Grounding human-object interaction to affordance behavior in multimodal datasets Henlein, Alexander Gopinath, Anju Krishnaswamy, Nikhil Mehler, Alexander Pustejovsky, James Front Artif Intell Artificial Intelligence While affordance detection and Human-Object interaction (HOI) detection tasks are related, the theoretical foundation of affordances makes it clear that the two are distinct. In particular, researchers in affordances make distinctions between J. J. Gibson's traditional definition of an affordance, “the action possibilities” of the object within the environment, and the definition of a telic affordance, or one defined by conventionalized purpose or use. We augment the HICO-DET dataset with annotations for Gibsonian and telic affordances and a subset of the dataset with annotations for the orientation of the humans and objects involved. We then train an adapted Human-Object Interaction (HOI) model and evaluate a pre-trained viewpoint estimation system on this augmented dataset. Our model, AffordanceUPT, is based on a two-stage adaptation of the Unary-Pairwise Transformer (UPT), which we modularize to make affordance detection independent of object detection. Our approach exhibits generalization to new objects and actions, can effectively make the Gibsonian/telic distinction, and shows that this distinction is correlated with features in the data that are not captured by the HOI annotations of the HICO-DET dataset. Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-01-30 /pmc/articles/PMC9923013/ /pubmed/36793938 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/frai.2023.1084740 Text en Copyright © 2023 Henlein, Gopinath, Krishnaswamy, Mehler and Pustejovsky. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Artificial Intelligence
Henlein, Alexander
Gopinath, Anju
Krishnaswamy, Nikhil
Mehler, Alexander
Pustejovsky, James
Grounding human-object interaction to affordance behavior in multimodal datasets
title Grounding human-object interaction to affordance behavior in multimodal datasets
title_full Grounding human-object interaction to affordance behavior in multimodal datasets
title_fullStr Grounding human-object interaction to affordance behavior in multimodal datasets
title_full_unstemmed Grounding human-object interaction to affordance behavior in multimodal datasets
title_short Grounding human-object interaction to affordance behavior in multimodal datasets
title_sort grounding human-object interaction to affordance behavior in multimodal datasets
topic Artificial Intelligence
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9923013/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36793938
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/frai.2023.1084740
work_keys_str_mv AT henleinalexander groundinghumanobjectinteractiontoaffordancebehaviorinmultimodaldatasets
AT gopinathanju groundinghumanobjectinteractiontoaffordancebehaviorinmultimodaldatasets
AT krishnaswamynikhil groundinghumanobjectinteractiontoaffordancebehaviorinmultimodaldatasets
AT mehleralexander groundinghumanobjectinteractiontoaffordancebehaviorinmultimodaldatasets
AT pustejovskyjames groundinghumanobjectinteractiontoaffordancebehaviorinmultimodaldatasets