Cargando…
Is percutaneous drainage better than endoscopic drainage in the management of patients with malignant obstructive jaundice? A meta-analysis of RCTs
To compare the safety and efficacy of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) and percutaneous transhepatic cholangial drainage (PTCD) in the treatment of malignant obstructive jaundice, a systematic review and meta-analysis of published studies was undertaken to assess the differences...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9923096/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36793615 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2023.1105728 |
_version_ | 1784887667325927424 |
---|---|
author | Bian, Cnogwen Fang, Yuan Xia, Jun Shi, Lan Huang, Hanfei Xiong, Qiru Wu, Ruolin Zeng, Zhong |
author_facet | Bian, Cnogwen Fang, Yuan Xia, Jun Shi, Lan Huang, Hanfei Xiong, Qiru Wu, Ruolin Zeng, Zhong |
author_sort | Bian, Cnogwen |
collection | PubMed |
description | To compare the safety and efficacy of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) and percutaneous transhepatic cholangial drainage (PTCD) in the treatment of malignant obstructive jaundice, a systematic review and meta-analysis of published studies was undertaken to assess the differences between the two procedures in terms of efficacy and safety. From November 2000 to November 2022, the Embase, PubMed, MEDLINE, and Cochrane databases were searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on the treatment of malignant obstructive jaundice with ERCP or PTCD. Two investigators independently assessed the quality of the included studies and extracted the data. Six RCTs, including 407 patients, were included. The results of the meta-analysis showed that the overall technical success rate in the ERCP group was significantly lower than that in the PTCD group (Z=3.19, P=0.001, OR=0.31 (95% CI: 0.15-0.64)), but with a higher overall procedure-related complication incidence rate (Z=2.57, P=0.01, OR=0.55 (95% CI: 0.34-0.87)). The incidence of procedure-related pancreatitis in the ERCP group was higher than that in the PTCD group (Z=2.80, P=0.005, OR=5.29 (95% CI: 1.65-16.97)), and the differences were statistically significant. No significant difference was observed between the two groups when the clinical efficacy, postoperative cholangitis, and bleeding rate were compared.Both treatments for malignant obstructive jaundice were efficacious and safe. However, the PTCD group had a greater technique success rate and a lower incidence of postoperative pancreatitis.The present meta-analysis has been registered in PROSPERO |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9923096 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-99230962023-02-14 Is percutaneous drainage better than endoscopic drainage in the management of patients with malignant obstructive jaundice? A meta-analysis of RCTs Bian, Cnogwen Fang, Yuan Xia, Jun Shi, Lan Huang, Hanfei Xiong, Qiru Wu, Ruolin Zeng, Zhong Front Oncol Oncology To compare the safety and efficacy of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) and percutaneous transhepatic cholangial drainage (PTCD) in the treatment of malignant obstructive jaundice, a systematic review and meta-analysis of published studies was undertaken to assess the differences between the two procedures in terms of efficacy and safety. From November 2000 to November 2022, the Embase, PubMed, MEDLINE, and Cochrane databases were searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on the treatment of malignant obstructive jaundice with ERCP or PTCD. Two investigators independently assessed the quality of the included studies and extracted the data. Six RCTs, including 407 patients, were included. The results of the meta-analysis showed that the overall technical success rate in the ERCP group was significantly lower than that in the PTCD group (Z=3.19, P=0.001, OR=0.31 (95% CI: 0.15-0.64)), but with a higher overall procedure-related complication incidence rate (Z=2.57, P=0.01, OR=0.55 (95% CI: 0.34-0.87)). The incidence of procedure-related pancreatitis in the ERCP group was higher than that in the PTCD group (Z=2.80, P=0.005, OR=5.29 (95% CI: 1.65-16.97)), and the differences were statistically significant. No significant difference was observed between the two groups when the clinical efficacy, postoperative cholangitis, and bleeding rate were compared.Both treatments for malignant obstructive jaundice were efficacious and safe. However, the PTCD group had a greater technique success rate and a lower incidence of postoperative pancreatitis.The present meta-analysis has been registered in PROSPERO Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-01-30 /pmc/articles/PMC9923096/ /pubmed/36793615 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2023.1105728 Text en Copyright © 2023 Bian, Fang, Xia, Shi, Huang, Xiong, Wu and Zeng https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Oncology Bian, Cnogwen Fang, Yuan Xia, Jun Shi, Lan Huang, Hanfei Xiong, Qiru Wu, Ruolin Zeng, Zhong Is percutaneous drainage better than endoscopic drainage in the management of patients with malignant obstructive jaundice? A meta-analysis of RCTs |
title | Is percutaneous drainage better than endoscopic drainage in the management of patients with malignant obstructive jaundice? A meta-analysis of RCTs |
title_full | Is percutaneous drainage better than endoscopic drainage in the management of patients with malignant obstructive jaundice? A meta-analysis of RCTs |
title_fullStr | Is percutaneous drainage better than endoscopic drainage in the management of patients with malignant obstructive jaundice? A meta-analysis of RCTs |
title_full_unstemmed | Is percutaneous drainage better than endoscopic drainage in the management of patients with malignant obstructive jaundice? A meta-analysis of RCTs |
title_short | Is percutaneous drainage better than endoscopic drainage in the management of patients with malignant obstructive jaundice? A meta-analysis of RCTs |
title_sort | is percutaneous drainage better than endoscopic drainage in the management of patients with malignant obstructive jaundice? a meta-analysis of rcts |
topic | Oncology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9923096/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36793615 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2023.1105728 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT biancnogwen ispercutaneousdrainagebetterthanendoscopicdrainageinthemanagementofpatientswithmalignantobstructivejaundiceametaanalysisofrcts AT fangyuan ispercutaneousdrainagebetterthanendoscopicdrainageinthemanagementofpatientswithmalignantobstructivejaundiceametaanalysisofrcts AT xiajun ispercutaneousdrainagebetterthanendoscopicdrainageinthemanagementofpatientswithmalignantobstructivejaundiceametaanalysisofrcts AT shilan ispercutaneousdrainagebetterthanendoscopicdrainageinthemanagementofpatientswithmalignantobstructivejaundiceametaanalysisofrcts AT huanghanfei ispercutaneousdrainagebetterthanendoscopicdrainageinthemanagementofpatientswithmalignantobstructivejaundiceametaanalysisofrcts AT xiongqiru ispercutaneousdrainagebetterthanendoscopicdrainageinthemanagementofpatientswithmalignantobstructivejaundiceametaanalysisofrcts AT wuruolin ispercutaneousdrainagebetterthanendoscopicdrainageinthemanagementofpatientswithmalignantobstructivejaundiceametaanalysisofrcts AT zengzhong ispercutaneousdrainagebetterthanendoscopicdrainageinthemanagementofpatientswithmalignantobstructivejaundiceametaanalysisofrcts |