Cargando…
Improving classification of correct and incorrect protein–protein docking models by augmenting the training set
MOTIVATION: Protein–protein interactions drive many relevant biological events, such as infection, replication and recognition. To control or engineer such events, we need to access the molecular details of the interaction provided by experimental 3D structures. However, such experiments take time a...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9923443/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36789292 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bioadv/vbad012 |
_version_ | 1784887741017751552 |
---|---|
author | Barradas-Bautista, Didier Almajed, Ali Oliva, Romina Kalnis, Panos Cavallo, Luigi |
author_facet | Barradas-Bautista, Didier Almajed, Ali Oliva, Romina Kalnis, Panos Cavallo, Luigi |
author_sort | Barradas-Bautista, Didier |
collection | PubMed |
description | MOTIVATION: Protein–protein interactions drive many relevant biological events, such as infection, replication and recognition. To control or engineer such events, we need to access the molecular details of the interaction provided by experimental 3D structures. However, such experiments take time and are expensive; moreover, the current technology cannot keep up with the high discovery rate of new interactions. Computational modeling, like protein–protein docking, can help to fill this gap by generating docking poses. Protein–protein docking generally consists of two parts, sampling and scoring. The sampling is an exhaustive search of the tridimensional space. The caveat of the sampling is that it generates a large number of incorrect poses, producing a highly unbalanced dataset. This limits the utility of the data to train machine learning classifiers. RESULTS: Using weak supervision, we developed a data augmentation method that we named hAIkal. Using hAIkal, we increased the labeled training data to train several algorithms. We trained and obtained different classifiers; the best classifier has 81% accuracy and 0.51 Matthews’ correlation coefficient on the test set, surpassing the state-of-the-art scoring functions. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: Docking models from Benchmark 5 are available at https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4012018. Processed tabular data are available at https://repository.kaust.edu.sa/handle/10754/666961. Google colab is available at https://colab.research.google.com/drive/1vbVrJcQSf6\_C3jOAmZzgQbTpuJ5zC1RP?usp=sharing SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics Advances online. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9923443 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-99234432023-02-13 Improving classification of correct and incorrect protein–protein docking models by augmenting the training set Barradas-Bautista, Didier Almajed, Ali Oliva, Romina Kalnis, Panos Cavallo, Luigi Bioinform Adv Original Paper MOTIVATION: Protein–protein interactions drive many relevant biological events, such as infection, replication and recognition. To control or engineer such events, we need to access the molecular details of the interaction provided by experimental 3D structures. However, such experiments take time and are expensive; moreover, the current technology cannot keep up with the high discovery rate of new interactions. Computational modeling, like protein–protein docking, can help to fill this gap by generating docking poses. Protein–protein docking generally consists of two parts, sampling and scoring. The sampling is an exhaustive search of the tridimensional space. The caveat of the sampling is that it generates a large number of incorrect poses, producing a highly unbalanced dataset. This limits the utility of the data to train machine learning classifiers. RESULTS: Using weak supervision, we developed a data augmentation method that we named hAIkal. Using hAIkal, we increased the labeled training data to train several algorithms. We trained and obtained different classifiers; the best classifier has 81% accuracy and 0.51 Matthews’ correlation coefficient on the test set, surpassing the state-of-the-art scoring functions. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: Docking models from Benchmark 5 are available at https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4012018. Processed tabular data are available at https://repository.kaust.edu.sa/handle/10754/666961. Google colab is available at https://colab.research.google.com/drive/1vbVrJcQSf6\_C3jOAmZzgQbTpuJ5zC1RP?usp=sharing SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics Advances online. Oxford University Press 2023-02-02 /pmc/articles/PMC9923443/ /pubmed/36789292 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bioadv/vbad012 Text en © The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Paper Barradas-Bautista, Didier Almajed, Ali Oliva, Romina Kalnis, Panos Cavallo, Luigi Improving classification of correct and incorrect protein–protein docking models by augmenting the training set |
title | Improving classification of correct and incorrect protein–protein docking models by augmenting the training set |
title_full | Improving classification of correct and incorrect protein–protein docking models by augmenting the training set |
title_fullStr | Improving classification of correct and incorrect protein–protein docking models by augmenting the training set |
title_full_unstemmed | Improving classification of correct and incorrect protein–protein docking models by augmenting the training set |
title_short | Improving classification of correct and incorrect protein–protein docking models by augmenting the training set |
title_sort | improving classification of correct and incorrect protein–protein docking models by augmenting the training set |
topic | Original Paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9923443/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36789292 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bioadv/vbad012 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT barradasbautistadidier improvingclassificationofcorrectandincorrectproteinproteindockingmodelsbyaugmentingthetrainingset AT almajedali improvingclassificationofcorrectandincorrectproteinproteindockingmodelsbyaugmentingthetrainingset AT olivaromina improvingclassificationofcorrectandincorrectproteinproteindockingmodelsbyaugmentingthetrainingset AT kalnispanos improvingclassificationofcorrectandincorrectproteinproteindockingmodelsbyaugmentingthetrainingset AT cavalloluigi improvingclassificationofcorrectandincorrectproteinproteindockingmodelsbyaugmentingthetrainingset |