Cargando…

Comparison of ocular morphological measurement by wide-angle echography and magnetic resonance imaging

OBJECTIVES: To compare the eye axial length (AL), equatorial horizontal diameter (HD), and equatorial vertical diameter (VD) of normal eyes using a novel wide-angle, arc-scanning, ultrasound diagnostic device for wide-angle B-mode echography. METHODS: In this cross-sectional study, wide-angle B-mode...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sekido, Kohsuke, Murayama, Kazuhiro, Mizuguchi, Tadashi, Sakurai, Ryota, Iwase, Akiyoshi, Shimada, Yoshiaki, Suzuki, Keita, Tanikawa, Atsuhiro, Horiguchi, Masayuki
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Fujita Medical Society 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9923445/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36789129
http://dx.doi.org/10.20407/fmj.2021-028
_version_ 1784887741515825152
author Sekido, Kohsuke
Murayama, Kazuhiro
Mizuguchi, Tadashi
Sakurai, Ryota
Iwase, Akiyoshi
Shimada, Yoshiaki
Suzuki, Keita
Tanikawa, Atsuhiro
Horiguchi, Masayuki
author_facet Sekido, Kohsuke
Murayama, Kazuhiro
Mizuguchi, Tadashi
Sakurai, Ryota
Iwase, Akiyoshi
Shimada, Yoshiaki
Suzuki, Keita
Tanikawa, Atsuhiro
Horiguchi, Masayuki
author_sort Sekido, Kohsuke
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: To compare the eye axial length (AL), equatorial horizontal diameter (HD), and equatorial vertical diameter (VD) of normal eyes using a novel wide-angle, arc-scanning, ultrasound diagnostic device for wide-angle B-mode echography. METHODS: In this cross-sectional study, wide-angle B-mode echography and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) were conducted on 22 normal eyes; the AL, HD, and VD were measured. RESULTS: The mean ALs were as follows: wide-angle B-mode echography, 25.22±1.47 mm and MRI, 25.24±1.46 mm; a significant correlation was observed between the two measurements (β=0.995 [0.976, 1.013]; p<0.001; 95% R(2)=1.00). The mean HDs were as follows: wide-angle B-mode echography, 22.33±0.84 mm and MRI, 22.55±0.90 mm; a significant correlation was observed between the two measurements (β=0.902 [0.750, 1.179]; p<0.001; 95% R(2)=0.81). The mean VDs were as follows: wide-angle B-mode echography, 22.77±0.91 mm; and MRI, 22.88±0.92 mm; a significant correlation was observed between the two measurements (β=0.966 [0.853, 1.097]; p<0.001; 95% R(2)=0.93). CONCLUSIONS: There were no significant differences in the measurements for each parameter by wide-angle B-mode echography and MRI. Therefore, wide-angle B-mode echography permits accurate visualization of ocular morphology.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9923445
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Fujita Medical Society
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-99234452023-02-13 Comparison of ocular morphological measurement by wide-angle echography and magnetic resonance imaging Sekido, Kohsuke Murayama, Kazuhiro Mizuguchi, Tadashi Sakurai, Ryota Iwase, Akiyoshi Shimada, Yoshiaki Suzuki, Keita Tanikawa, Atsuhiro Horiguchi, Masayuki Fujita Med J Original Article OBJECTIVES: To compare the eye axial length (AL), equatorial horizontal diameter (HD), and equatorial vertical diameter (VD) of normal eyes using a novel wide-angle, arc-scanning, ultrasound diagnostic device for wide-angle B-mode echography. METHODS: In this cross-sectional study, wide-angle B-mode echography and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) were conducted on 22 normal eyes; the AL, HD, and VD were measured. RESULTS: The mean ALs were as follows: wide-angle B-mode echography, 25.22±1.47 mm and MRI, 25.24±1.46 mm; a significant correlation was observed between the two measurements (β=0.995 [0.976, 1.013]; p<0.001; 95% R(2)=1.00). The mean HDs were as follows: wide-angle B-mode echography, 22.33±0.84 mm and MRI, 22.55±0.90 mm; a significant correlation was observed between the two measurements (β=0.902 [0.750, 1.179]; p<0.001; 95% R(2)=0.81). The mean VDs were as follows: wide-angle B-mode echography, 22.77±0.91 mm; and MRI, 22.88±0.92 mm; a significant correlation was observed between the two measurements (β=0.966 [0.853, 1.097]; p<0.001; 95% R(2)=0.93). CONCLUSIONS: There were no significant differences in the measurements for each parameter by wide-angle B-mode echography and MRI. Therefore, wide-angle B-mode echography permits accurate visualization of ocular morphology. Fujita Medical Society 2023-02 2022-05-25 /pmc/articles/PMC9923445/ /pubmed/36789129 http://dx.doi.org/10.20407/fmj.2021-028 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open access article distributed under the Terms of Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Sekido, Kohsuke
Murayama, Kazuhiro
Mizuguchi, Tadashi
Sakurai, Ryota
Iwase, Akiyoshi
Shimada, Yoshiaki
Suzuki, Keita
Tanikawa, Atsuhiro
Horiguchi, Masayuki
Comparison of ocular morphological measurement by wide-angle echography and magnetic resonance imaging
title Comparison of ocular morphological measurement by wide-angle echography and magnetic resonance imaging
title_full Comparison of ocular morphological measurement by wide-angle echography and magnetic resonance imaging
title_fullStr Comparison of ocular morphological measurement by wide-angle echography and magnetic resonance imaging
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of ocular morphological measurement by wide-angle echography and magnetic resonance imaging
title_short Comparison of ocular morphological measurement by wide-angle echography and magnetic resonance imaging
title_sort comparison of ocular morphological measurement by wide-angle echography and magnetic resonance imaging
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9923445/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36789129
http://dx.doi.org/10.20407/fmj.2021-028
work_keys_str_mv AT sekidokohsuke comparisonofocularmorphologicalmeasurementbywideangleechographyandmagneticresonanceimaging
AT murayamakazuhiro comparisonofocularmorphologicalmeasurementbywideangleechographyandmagneticresonanceimaging
AT mizuguchitadashi comparisonofocularmorphologicalmeasurementbywideangleechographyandmagneticresonanceimaging
AT sakurairyota comparisonofocularmorphologicalmeasurementbywideangleechographyandmagneticresonanceimaging
AT iwaseakiyoshi comparisonofocularmorphologicalmeasurementbywideangleechographyandmagneticresonanceimaging
AT shimadayoshiaki comparisonofocularmorphologicalmeasurementbywideangleechographyandmagneticresonanceimaging
AT suzukikeita comparisonofocularmorphologicalmeasurementbywideangleechographyandmagneticresonanceimaging
AT tanikawaatsuhiro comparisonofocularmorphologicalmeasurementbywideangleechographyandmagneticresonanceimaging
AT horiguchimasayuki comparisonofocularmorphologicalmeasurementbywideangleechographyandmagneticresonanceimaging