Cargando…

Tobacco quitline performance: Comparing the impacts of early cessation and proactive re-engagement on callers’ smoking status at follow-up at 12 months

INTRODUCTION: While tobacco Quitlines are effective in the promotion of smoking cessation, the majority of callers who wish to quit still fail to do so. The aim of this study was to determine if 12-month tobacco Quitline smoking cessation rates could be improved with re-engagement of callers whose f...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cassidy, Daniel G., Wang, Xin-Qun, Mallawaarachchi, Indika, Wiseman, Kara P., Ebbert, Jon O., Blue Star, John A., Aycock, Chase A., Estevez Burns, Rosemary, Jones, John R., Krunnfusz, Andrea E., Halbert, Jennifer P., Roy, Natalie M., Ellis, Jordan M., Williams, Juinell B., Klesges, Robert C., Talcott, Gerald W.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: European Publishing on behalf of the International Society for the Prevention of Tobacco Induced Diseases (ISPTID) 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9923459/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36798676
http://dx.doi.org/10.18332/tid/159125
_version_ 1784887744954105856
author Cassidy, Daniel G.
Wang, Xin-Qun
Mallawaarachchi, Indika
Wiseman, Kara P.
Ebbert, Jon O.
Blue Star, John A.
Aycock, Chase A.
Estevez Burns, Rosemary
Jones, John R.
Krunnfusz, Andrea E.
Halbert, Jennifer P.
Roy, Natalie M.
Ellis, Jordan M.
Williams, Juinell B.
Klesges, Robert C.
Talcott, Gerald W.
author_facet Cassidy, Daniel G.
Wang, Xin-Qun
Mallawaarachchi, Indika
Wiseman, Kara P.
Ebbert, Jon O.
Blue Star, John A.
Aycock, Chase A.
Estevez Burns, Rosemary
Jones, John R.
Krunnfusz, Andrea E.
Halbert, Jennifer P.
Roy, Natalie M.
Ellis, Jordan M.
Williams, Juinell B.
Klesges, Robert C.
Talcott, Gerald W.
author_sort Cassidy, Daniel G.
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: While tobacco Quitlines are effective in the promotion of smoking cessation, the majority of callers who wish to quit still fail to do so. The aim of this study was to determine if 12-month tobacco Quitline smoking cessation rates could be improved with re-engagement of callers whose first Quitline treatment failed to establish abstinence. METHODS: In an adaptive trial, 614 adult smokers, who were active duty, retired, and family of military personnel with TRICARE insurance who called a tobacco Quitline, received a previously evaluated and efficacious four-session tobacco cessation intervention with nicotine replacement therapy (NRT). At the scheduled follow-up at 3 months, callers who had not yet achieved abstinence were offered the opportunity to re-engage. This resulted in three caller groups: 1) those who were abstinent, 2) those who were still smoking but willing to re-engage with an additional Quitline treatment; and 3) individuals who were still smoking but declined re-engagement. A propensity score-adjusted logistic regression model was generated to compare past-7-day point prevalence abstinence at 12 months post Quitline consultation. RESULTS: Using a propensity score adjusted logistic regression model, comparison of the three groups resulted in higher odds of past-7-day point prevalence abstinence at follow-up at 12 months for those who were abstinent at 3 months compared to those who re-engaged (OR=9.6; 95% CI: 5.2–17.8; Bonferroni adjusted p<0.0001), and relative to those who declined re-engagement (OR=13.4; 95% CI: 6.8–26.3; Bonferroni adjusted p<0.0001). There was no statistically significant difference in smoking abstinence between smokers at 3 months who re-engaged and those who declined re-engagement (OR=1.39; 95% CI: 0.68–2.85). CONCLUSIONS: Tobacco Quitlines seeking to select a single initiative by which to maximize abstinence at follow-up at 12 months may benefit from diverting additional resources from the re-engagement of callers whose initial quit attempt failed, toward changes which increase callers’ probability of success within the first 3 months of treatment. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This study is registered at clinicaltrials.gov (NCT02201810).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9923459
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher European Publishing on behalf of the International Society for the Prevention of Tobacco Induced Diseases (ISPTID)
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-99234592023-02-15 Tobacco quitline performance: Comparing the impacts of early cessation and proactive re-engagement on callers’ smoking status at follow-up at 12 months Cassidy, Daniel G. Wang, Xin-Qun Mallawaarachchi, Indika Wiseman, Kara P. Ebbert, Jon O. Blue Star, John A. Aycock, Chase A. Estevez Burns, Rosemary Jones, John R. Krunnfusz, Andrea E. Halbert, Jennifer P. Roy, Natalie M. Ellis, Jordan M. Williams, Juinell B. Klesges, Robert C. Talcott, Gerald W. Tob Induc Dis Research Paper INTRODUCTION: While tobacco Quitlines are effective in the promotion of smoking cessation, the majority of callers who wish to quit still fail to do so. The aim of this study was to determine if 12-month tobacco Quitline smoking cessation rates could be improved with re-engagement of callers whose first Quitline treatment failed to establish abstinence. METHODS: In an adaptive trial, 614 adult smokers, who were active duty, retired, and family of military personnel with TRICARE insurance who called a tobacco Quitline, received a previously evaluated and efficacious four-session tobacco cessation intervention with nicotine replacement therapy (NRT). At the scheduled follow-up at 3 months, callers who had not yet achieved abstinence were offered the opportunity to re-engage. This resulted in three caller groups: 1) those who were abstinent, 2) those who were still smoking but willing to re-engage with an additional Quitline treatment; and 3) individuals who were still smoking but declined re-engagement. A propensity score-adjusted logistic regression model was generated to compare past-7-day point prevalence abstinence at 12 months post Quitline consultation. RESULTS: Using a propensity score adjusted logistic regression model, comparison of the three groups resulted in higher odds of past-7-day point prevalence abstinence at follow-up at 12 months for those who were abstinent at 3 months compared to those who re-engaged (OR=9.6; 95% CI: 5.2–17.8; Bonferroni adjusted p<0.0001), and relative to those who declined re-engagement (OR=13.4; 95% CI: 6.8–26.3; Bonferroni adjusted p<0.0001). There was no statistically significant difference in smoking abstinence between smokers at 3 months who re-engaged and those who declined re-engagement (OR=1.39; 95% CI: 0.68–2.85). CONCLUSIONS: Tobacco Quitlines seeking to select a single initiative by which to maximize abstinence at follow-up at 12 months may benefit from diverting additional resources from the re-engagement of callers whose initial quit attempt failed, toward changes which increase callers’ probability of success within the first 3 months of treatment. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This study is registered at clinicaltrials.gov (NCT02201810). European Publishing on behalf of the International Society for the Prevention of Tobacco Induced Diseases (ISPTID) 2023-02-15 /pmc/articles/PMC9923459/ /pubmed/36798676 http://dx.doi.org/10.18332/tid/159125 Text en © 2023 Cassidy D.G. et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
spellingShingle Research Paper
Cassidy, Daniel G.
Wang, Xin-Qun
Mallawaarachchi, Indika
Wiseman, Kara P.
Ebbert, Jon O.
Blue Star, John A.
Aycock, Chase A.
Estevez Burns, Rosemary
Jones, John R.
Krunnfusz, Andrea E.
Halbert, Jennifer P.
Roy, Natalie M.
Ellis, Jordan M.
Williams, Juinell B.
Klesges, Robert C.
Talcott, Gerald W.
Tobacco quitline performance: Comparing the impacts of early cessation and proactive re-engagement on callers’ smoking status at follow-up at 12 months
title Tobacco quitline performance: Comparing the impacts of early cessation and proactive re-engagement on callers’ smoking status at follow-up at 12 months
title_full Tobacco quitline performance: Comparing the impacts of early cessation and proactive re-engagement on callers’ smoking status at follow-up at 12 months
title_fullStr Tobacco quitline performance: Comparing the impacts of early cessation and proactive re-engagement on callers’ smoking status at follow-up at 12 months
title_full_unstemmed Tobacco quitline performance: Comparing the impacts of early cessation and proactive re-engagement on callers’ smoking status at follow-up at 12 months
title_short Tobacco quitline performance: Comparing the impacts of early cessation and proactive re-engagement on callers’ smoking status at follow-up at 12 months
title_sort tobacco quitline performance: comparing the impacts of early cessation and proactive re-engagement on callers’ smoking status at follow-up at 12 months
topic Research Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9923459/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36798676
http://dx.doi.org/10.18332/tid/159125
work_keys_str_mv AT cassidydanielg tobaccoquitlineperformancecomparingtheimpactsofearlycessationandproactivereengagementoncallerssmokingstatusatfollowupat12months
AT wangxinqun tobaccoquitlineperformancecomparingtheimpactsofearlycessationandproactivereengagementoncallerssmokingstatusatfollowupat12months
AT mallawaarachchiindika tobaccoquitlineperformancecomparingtheimpactsofearlycessationandproactivereengagementoncallerssmokingstatusatfollowupat12months
AT wisemankarap tobaccoquitlineperformancecomparingtheimpactsofearlycessationandproactivereengagementoncallerssmokingstatusatfollowupat12months
AT ebbertjono tobaccoquitlineperformancecomparingtheimpactsofearlycessationandproactivereengagementoncallerssmokingstatusatfollowupat12months
AT bluestarjohna tobaccoquitlineperformancecomparingtheimpactsofearlycessationandproactivereengagementoncallerssmokingstatusatfollowupat12months
AT aycockchasea tobaccoquitlineperformancecomparingtheimpactsofearlycessationandproactivereengagementoncallerssmokingstatusatfollowupat12months
AT estevezburnsrosemary tobaccoquitlineperformancecomparingtheimpactsofearlycessationandproactivereengagementoncallerssmokingstatusatfollowupat12months
AT jonesjohnr tobaccoquitlineperformancecomparingtheimpactsofearlycessationandproactivereengagementoncallerssmokingstatusatfollowupat12months
AT krunnfuszandreae tobaccoquitlineperformancecomparingtheimpactsofearlycessationandproactivereengagementoncallerssmokingstatusatfollowupat12months
AT halbertjenniferp tobaccoquitlineperformancecomparingtheimpactsofearlycessationandproactivereengagementoncallerssmokingstatusatfollowupat12months
AT roynataliem tobaccoquitlineperformancecomparingtheimpactsofearlycessationandproactivereengagementoncallerssmokingstatusatfollowupat12months
AT ellisjordanm tobaccoquitlineperformancecomparingtheimpactsofearlycessationandproactivereengagementoncallerssmokingstatusatfollowupat12months
AT williamsjuinellb tobaccoquitlineperformancecomparingtheimpactsofearlycessationandproactivereengagementoncallerssmokingstatusatfollowupat12months
AT klesgesrobertc tobaccoquitlineperformancecomparingtheimpactsofearlycessationandproactivereengagementoncallerssmokingstatusatfollowupat12months
AT talcottgeraldw tobaccoquitlineperformancecomparingtheimpactsofearlycessationandproactivereengagementoncallerssmokingstatusatfollowupat12months