Cargando…

Isolation‐by‐distance and isolation‐by‐oceanography in Maroon Anemonefish (Amphiprion biaculeatus)

Obtaining dispersal estimates for a species is key to understanding local adaptation and population dynamics and to implementing conservation actions. Genetic isolation‐by‐distance (IBD) patterns can be used for estimating dispersal, and these patterns are especially useful for marine species in whi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Fitz, Kyra S., Montes, Humberto R., Thompson, Diane M., Pinsky, Malin L.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9923474/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36793687
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/eva.13448
_version_ 1784887748357783552
author Fitz, Kyra S.
Montes, Humberto R.
Thompson, Diane M.
Pinsky, Malin L.
author_facet Fitz, Kyra S.
Montes, Humberto R.
Thompson, Diane M.
Pinsky, Malin L.
author_sort Fitz, Kyra S.
collection PubMed
description Obtaining dispersal estimates for a species is key to understanding local adaptation and population dynamics and to implementing conservation actions. Genetic isolation‐by‐distance (IBD) patterns can be used for estimating dispersal, and these patterns are especially useful for marine species in which few other methods are available. In this study, we genotyped coral reef fish (Amphiprion biaculeatus) at 16 microsatellite loci across eight sites across 210 km in the central Philippines to generate fine‐scale estimates of dispersal. All sites except for one followed IBD patterns. Using IBD theory, we estimated a larval dispersal kernel spread of 8.9 km (95% confidence interval of 2.3–18.4 km). Genetic distance to the remaining site correlated strongly with the inverse probability of larval dispersal from an oceanographic model. Ocean currents were a better explanation for genetic distance at large spatial extents (sites greater than 150 km apart), while geographic distance remained the best explanation for spatial extents less than 150 km. Our study demonstrates the utility of combining IBD patterns with oceanographic simulations to understand connectivity in marine environments and to guide marine conservation strategies.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9923474
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-99234742023-02-14 Isolation‐by‐distance and isolation‐by‐oceanography in Maroon Anemonefish (Amphiprion biaculeatus) Fitz, Kyra S. Montes, Humberto R. Thompson, Diane M. Pinsky, Malin L. Evol Appl Special Issue Articles Obtaining dispersal estimates for a species is key to understanding local adaptation and population dynamics and to implementing conservation actions. Genetic isolation‐by‐distance (IBD) patterns can be used for estimating dispersal, and these patterns are especially useful for marine species in which few other methods are available. In this study, we genotyped coral reef fish (Amphiprion biaculeatus) at 16 microsatellite loci across eight sites across 210 km in the central Philippines to generate fine‐scale estimates of dispersal. All sites except for one followed IBD patterns. Using IBD theory, we estimated a larval dispersal kernel spread of 8.9 km (95% confidence interval of 2.3–18.4 km). Genetic distance to the remaining site correlated strongly with the inverse probability of larval dispersal from an oceanographic model. Ocean currents were a better explanation for genetic distance at large spatial extents (sites greater than 150 km apart), while geographic distance remained the best explanation for spatial extents less than 150 km. Our study demonstrates the utility of combining IBD patterns with oceanographic simulations to understand connectivity in marine environments and to guide marine conservation strategies. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-08-25 /pmc/articles/PMC9923474/ /pubmed/36793687 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/eva.13448 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Evolutionary Applications published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Special Issue Articles
Fitz, Kyra S.
Montes, Humberto R.
Thompson, Diane M.
Pinsky, Malin L.
Isolation‐by‐distance and isolation‐by‐oceanography in Maroon Anemonefish (Amphiprion biaculeatus)
title Isolation‐by‐distance and isolation‐by‐oceanography in Maroon Anemonefish (Amphiprion biaculeatus)
title_full Isolation‐by‐distance and isolation‐by‐oceanography in Maroon Anemonefish (Amphiprion biaculeatus)
title_fullStr Isolation‐by‐distance and isolation‐by‐oceanography in Maroon Anemonefish (Amphiprion biaculeatus)
title_full_unstemmed Isolation‐by‐distance and isolation‐by‐oceanography in Maroon Anemonefish (Amphiprion biaculeatus)
title_short Isolation‐by‐distance and isolation‐by‐oceanography in Maroon Anemonefish (Amphiprion biaculeatus)
title_sort isolation‐by‐distance and isolation‐by‐oceanography in maroon anemonefish (amphiprion biaculeatus)
topic Special Issue Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9923474/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36793687
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/eva.13448
work_keys_str_mv AT fitzkyras isolationbydistanceandisolationbyoceanographyinmaroonanemonefishamphiprionbiaculeatus
AT monteshumbertor isolationbydistanceandisolationbyoceanographyinmaroonanemonefishamphiprionbiaculeatus
AT thompsondianem isolationbydistanceandisolationbyoceanographyinmaroonanemonefishamphiprionbiaculeatus
AT pinskymalinl isolationbydistanceandisolationbyoceanographyinmaroonanemonefishamphiprionbiaculeatus