Cargando…

Carry‐over effects and fitness trade‐offs in marine life histories: The costs of complexity for adaptation

Most marine organisms have complex life histories, where the individual stages of a life cycle are often morphologically and ecologically distinct. Nevertheless, life‐history stages share a single genome and are linked phenotypically (by “carry‐over effects”). These commonalities across the life his...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Marshall, Dustin J., Connallon, Tim
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9923492/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36793690
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/eva.13477
_version_ 1784887752845688832
author Marshall, Dustin J.
Connallon, Tim
author_facet Marshall, Dustin J.
Connallon, Tim
author_sort Marshall, Dustin J.
collection PubMed
description Most marine organisms have complex life histories, where the individual stages of a life cycle are often morphologically and ecologically distinct. Nevertheless, life‐history stages share a single genome and are linked phenotypically (by “carry‐over effects”). These commonalities across the life history couple the evolutionary dynamics of different stages and provide an arena for evolutionary constraints. The degree to which genetic and phenotypic links among stages hamper adaptation in any one stage remains unclear and yet adaptation is essential if marine organisms will adapt to future climates. Here, we use an extension of Fisher's geometric model to explore how both carry‐over effects and genetic links among life‐history stages affect the emergence of pleiotropic trade‐offs between fitness components of different stages. We subsequently explore the evolutionary trajectories of adaptation of each stage to its optimum using a simple model of stage‐specific viability selection with nonoverlapping generations. We show that fitness trade‐offs between stages are likely to be common and that such trade‐offs naturally emerge through either divergent selection or mutation. We also find that evolutionary conflicts among stages should escalate during adaptation, but carry‐over effects can ameliorate this conflict. Carry‐over effects also tip the evolutionary balance in favor of better survival in earlier life‐history stages at the expense of poorer survival in later stages. This effect arises in our discrete‐generation framework and is, therefore, unrelated to age‐related declines in the efficacy of selection that arise in models with overlapping generations. Our results imply a vast scope for conflicting selection between life‐history stages, with pervasive evolutionary constraints emerging from initially modest selection differences between stages. Organisms with complex life histories should also be more constrained in their capacity to adapt to global change than those with simple life histories.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9923492
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-99234922023-02-14 Carry‐over effects and fitness trade‐offs in marine life histories: The costs of complexity for adaptation Marshall, Dustin J. Connallon, Tim Evol Appl Special Issue Articles Most marine organisms have complex life histories, where the individual stages of a life cycle are often morphologically and ecologically distinct. Nevertheless, life‐history stages share a single genome and are linked phenotypically (by “carry‐over effects”). These commonalities across the life history couple the evolutionary dynamics of different stages and provide an arena for evolutionary constraints. The degree to which genetic and phenotypic links among stages hamper adaptation in any one stage remains unclear and yet adaptation is essential if marine organisms will adapt to future climates. Here, we use an extension of Fisher's geometric model to explore how both carry‐over effects and genetic links among life‐history stages affect the emergence of pleiotropic trade‐offs between fitness components of different stages. We subsequently explore the evolutionary trajectories of adaptation of each stage to its optimum using a simple model of stage‐specific viability selection with nonoverlapping generations. We show that fitness trade‐offs between stages are likely to be common and that such trade‐offs naturally emerge through either divergent selection or mutation. We also find that evolutionary conflicts among stages should escalate during adaptation, but carry‐over effects can ameliorate this conflict. Carry‐over effects also tip the evolutionary balance in favor of better survival in earlier life‐history stages at the expense of poorer survival in later stages. This effect arises in our discrete‐generation framework and is, therefore, unrelated to age‐related declines in the efficacy of selection that arise in models with overlapping generations. Our results imply a vast scope for conflicting selection between life‐history stages, with pervasive evolutionary constraints emerging from initially modest selection differences between stages. Organisms with complex life histories should also be more constrained in their capacity to adapt to global change than those with simple life histories. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-09-20 /pmc/articles/PMC9923492/ /pubmed/36793690 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/eva.13477 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Evolutionary Applications published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Special Issue Articles
Marshall, Dustin J.
Connallon, Tim
Carry‐over effects and fitness trade‐offs in marine life histories: The costs of complexity for adaptation
title Carry‐over effects and fitness trade‐offs in marine life histories: The costs of complexity for adaptation
title_full Carry‐over effects and fitness trade‐offs in marine life histories: The costs of complexity for adaptation
title_fullStr Carry‐over effects and fitness trade‐offs in marine life histories: The costs of complexity for adaptation
title_full_unstemmed Carry‐over effects and fitness trade‐offs in marine life histories: The costs of complexity for adaptation
title_short Carry‐over effects and fitness trade‐offs in marine life histories: The costs of complexity for adaptation
title_sort carry‐over effects and fitness trade‐offs in marine life histories: the costs of complexity for adaptation
topic Special Issue Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9923492/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36793690
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/eva.13477
work_keys_str_mv AT marshalldustinj carryovereffectsandfitnesstradeoffsinmarinelifehistoriesthecostsofcomplexityforadaptation
AT connallontim carryovereffectsandfitnesstradeoffsinmarinelifehistoriesthecostsofcomplexityforadaptation