Cargando…

Validation of 4D flow cardiovascular magnetic resonance in TIPS stent grafts using a 3D-printed flow phantom

BACKGROUND: Four-dimensional (4D) flow cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) is feasible for portal blood flow evaluation after placement of transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunts (TIPS) in patients with liver cirrhosis. However, clinical acceptance of 4D flow CMR in TIPS patients is limit...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Riedel, Christoph, Ristow, Inka, Lenz, Alexander, Schoennagel, Bjoern P., Hoffmann, Marko, Piecha, Felix, Adam, Gerhard, Reeder, Scott B., Bannas, Peter
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9923912/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36775827
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12968-023-00920-5
_version_ 1784887800438456320
author Riedel, Christoph
Ristow, Inka
Lenz, Alexander
Schoennagel, Bjoern P.
Hoffmann, Marko
Piecha, Felix
Adam, Gerhard
Reeder, Scott B.
Bannas, Peter
author_facet Riedel, Christoph
Ristow, Inka
Lenz, Alexander
Schoennagel, Bjoern P.
Hoffmann, Marko
Piecha, Felix
Adam, Gerhard
Reeder, Scott B.
Bannas, Peter
author_sort Riedel, Christoph
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Four-dimensional (4D) flow cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) is feasible for portal blood flow evaluation after placement of transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunts (TIPS) in patients with liver cirrhosis. However, clinical acceptance of 4D flow CMR in TIPS patients is limited due to the lack of validation studies. The purpose of this study was to validate 4D flow CMR-derived measurements in TIPS stent grafts using a three-dimensional (3D)-printed flow phantom. METHODS: A translucent flow phantom of the portal vasculature was 3D-printed. The phantom consisted of the superior mesenteric vein and the splenic vein draining into the portal vein, the TIPS-tract, and the hepatic vein. A TIPS stent graft (Gore® Viatorr®) was positioned within the TIPS-tract. Superior mesenteric vein and splenic vein served as inlets for blood-mimicking fluid. 4D flow CMR acquisitions were performed at 3T at preset flow rates of 0.8 to 2.8 l/min using velocity encoding of both 1.0 and 2.0 m/s. Flow rates and velocities were measured at predefined levels in the portal vasculature and within the stent graft. Accuracy of 4D flow CMR was assessed through linear regression with reference measurements obtained by flow sensors and two-dimensional (2D) phase contrast (PC) CMR. Intra- and interobserver agreement were assessed through Bland–Altman analyses. RESULTS: At a velocity encoding of 2.0 m/s, 4D flow CMR-derived flow rates and velocities showed an excellent correlation with preset flow rates and 2D PC CMR-derived flow velocities at all vascular levels and within the stent graft (all r ≥ 0.958, p ≤ 0.003). At a velocity encoding of 1.0 m/s, aliasing artifacts were present within the stent graft at flow rates ≥ 2.0 l/min. 4D flow CMR-derived measurements revealed high intra- and interobserver agreement. CONCLUSIONS: The in vitro accuracy and precision of 4D flow CMR is unaffected by the presence of TIPS stent grafts, suggesting that 4D flow CMR may be used to monitor TIPS patency in patients with liver cirrhosis. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12968-023-00920-5.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9923912
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-99239122023-02-14 Validation of 4D flow cardiovascular magnetic resonance in TIPS stent grafts using a 3D-printed flow phantom Riedel, Christoph Ristow, Inka Lenz, Alexander Schoennagel, Bjoern P. Hoffmann, Marko Piecha, Felix Adam, Gerhard Reeder, Scott B. Bannas, Peter J Cardiovasc Magn Reson Research BACKGROUND: Four-dimensional (4D) flow cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) is feasible for portal blood flow evaluation after placement of transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunts (TIPS) in patients with liver cirrhosis. However, clinical acceptance of 4D flow CMR in TIPS patients is limited due to the lack of validation studies. The purpose of this study was to validate 4D flow CMR-derived measurements in TIPS stent grafts using a three-dimensional (3D)-printed flow phantom. METHODS: A translucent flow phantom of the portal vasculature was 3D-printed. The phantom consisted of the superior mesenteric vein and the splenic vein draining into the portal vein, the TIPS-tract, and the hepatic vein. A TIPS stent graft (Gore® Viatorr®) was positioned within the TIPS-tract. Superior mesenteric vein and splenic vein served as inlets for blood-mimicking fluid. 4D flow CMR acquisitions were performed at 3T at preset flow rates of 0.8 to 2.8 l/min using velocity encoding of both 1.0 and 2.0 m/s. Flow rates and velocities were measured at predefined levels in the portal vasculature and within the stent graft. Accuracy of 4D flow CMR was assessed through linear regression with reference measurements obtained by flow sensors and two-dimensional (2D) phase contrast (PC) CMR. Intra- and interobserver agreement were assessed through Bland–Altman analyses. RESULTS: At a velocity encoding of 2.0 m/s, 4D flow CMR-derived flow rates and velocities showed an excellent correlation with preset flow rates and 2D PC CMR-derived flow velocities at all vascular levels and within the stent graft (all r ≥ 0.958, p ≤ 0.003). At a velocity encoding of 1.0 m/s, aliasing artifacts were present within the stent graft at flow rates ≥ 2.0 l/min. 4D flow CMR-derived measurements revealed high intra- and interobserver agreement. CONCLUSIONS: The in vitro accuracy and precision of 4D flow CMR is unaffected by the presence of TIPS stent grafts, suggesting that 4D flow CMR may be used to monitor TIPS patency in patients with liver cirrhosis. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12968-023-00920-5. BioMed Central 2023-02-13 /pmc/articles/PMC9923912/ /pubmed/36775827 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12968-023-00920-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Riedel, Christoph
Ristow, Inka
Lenz, Alexander
Schoennagel, Bjoern P.
Hoffmann, Marko
Piecha, Felix
Adam, Gerhard
Reeder, Scott B.
Bannas, Peter
Validation of 4D flow cardiovascular magnetic resonance in TIPS stent grafts using a 3D-printed flow phantom
title Validation of 4D flow cardiovascular magnetic resonance in TIPS stent grafts using a 3D-printed flow phantom
title_full Validation of 4D flow cardiovascular magnetic resonance in TIPS stent grafts using a 3D-printed flow phantom
title_fullStr Validation of 4D flow cardiovascular magnetic resonance in TIPS stent grafts using a 3D-printed flow phantom
title_full_unstemmed Validation of 4D flow cardiovascular magnetic resonance in TIPS stent grafts using a 3D-printed flow phantom
title_short Validation of 4D flow cardiovascular magnetic resonance in TIPS stent grafts using a 3D-printed flow phantom
title_sort validation of 4d flow cardiovascular magnetic resonance in tips stent grafts using a 3d-printed flow phantom
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9923912/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36775827
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12968-023-00920-5
work_keys_str_mv AT riedelchristoph validationof4dflowcardiovascularmagneticresonanceintipsstentgraftsusinga3dprintedflowphantom
AT ristowinka validationof4dflowcardiovascularmagneticresonanceintipsstentgraftsusinga3dprintedflowphantom
AT lenzalexander validationof4dflowcardiovascularmagneticresonanceintipsstentgraftsusinga3dprintedflowphantom
AT schoennagelbjoernp validationof4dflowcardiovascularmagneticresonanceintipsstentgraftsusinga3dprintedflowphantom
AT hoffmannmarko validationof4dflowcardiovascularmagneticresonanceintipsstentgraftsusinga3dprintedflowphantom
AT piechafelix validationof4dflowcardiovascularmagneticresonanceintipsstentgraftsusinga3dprintedflowphantom
AT adamgerhard validationof4dflowcardiovascularmagneticresonanceintipsstentgraftsusinga3dprintedflowphantom
AT reederscottb validationof4dflowcardiovascularmagneticresonanceintipsstentgraftsusinga3dprintedflowphantom
AT bannaspeter validationof4dflowcardiovascularmagneticresonanceintipsstentgraftsusinga3dprintedflowphantom