Cargando…

Clinical efficacy and safety of linezolid in intensive care unit patients

BACKGROUND: To characterize the population of critically ill patients and infections treated with linezolid in the intensive care unit (ICU), and to evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of linezolid therapy. METHODS: This multi-center, observational, real-world study was conducted across 52 hos...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ma, Aijia, Dong, Meiling, Cheng, Jiangli, Liao, Xuelian, Dong, Wei, Liu, Chang, Hu, Chenggong, Yang, Jing, Kang, Yan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9923966/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36789359
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jointm.2022.05.006
_version_ 1784887810113667072
author Ma, Aijia
Dong, Meiling
Cheng, Jiangli
Liao, Xuelian
Dong, Wei
Liu, Chang
Hu, Chenggong
Yang, Jing
Kang, Yan
author_facet Ma, Aijia
Dong, Meiling
Cheng, Jiangli
Liao, Xuelian
Dong, Wei
Liu, Chang
Hu, Chenggong
Yang, Jing
Kang, Yan
author_sort Ma, Aijia
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: To characterize the population of critically ill patients and infections treated with linezolid in the intensive care unit (ICU), and to evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of linezolid therapy. METHODS: This multi-center, observational, real-world study was conducted across 52 hospitals between June 9, 2018, and December 28, 2019. Patients who met the following inclusion criteria were included: (1) admitted to the ICU, (2) of any age group, and (3) having a clinical or laboratory diagnosis of a Gram-positive bacterial infection. Clinical efficacy was categorized as success (cured or improved), failed, or non-evaluable. Adverse events and serious adverse events were recorded during treatment. RESULTS: A total of 366 ICU patients who met the inclusion criteria were evaluated. Linezolid was used as second- and first-line treatment in 232 (63.4%) and 134 (36.6%) patients, respectively. The most common isolated strain was Staphylococcus aureus (methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus: n=37/119, 31.1%; methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus: n=15/119, 12.6%); this was followed by Enterococci (vancomycin-resistant Enterococci: n=8/119, 6.7%; vancomycin-susceptible Enterococci: n=11/119, 9.2%) and Streptococcus pneumoniae (multidrug-resistant: n=4/119, 3.4%; non-multidrug resistant: n=2/119, 1.7%). The main infection sites where pathogens were detected included the lung (n=216/366, 59.6%), skin and soft tissue (n=104/366, 28.4%), and blood (n=50/366, 13.7%). Clinical success was achieved in 301 (82.2%) patients; 34 (9.3%) were cured and 267 (73.0%) improved; treatment failure and non-evaluable outcomes were observed in 29 (7.9%) in 36 (9.8%) patients, respectively. Linezolid-related adverse events were reported in 8 (2.2%) patients. No treatment-related serious adverse events were reported. CONCLUSIONS: Based on real-world results, linezolid was found to be effective and safe in the treatment of Gram-positive bacterial infections in critically ill patients.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9923966
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-99239662023-02-13 Clinical efficacy and safety of linezolid in intensive care unit patients Ma, Aijia Dong, Meiling Cheng, Jiangli Liao, Xuelian Dong, Wei Liu, Chang Hu, Chenggong Yang, Jing Kang, Yan J Intensive Med Original Article BACKGROUND: To characterize the population of critically ill patients and infections treated with linezolid in the intensive care unit (ICU), and to evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of linezolid therapy. METHODS: This multi-center, observational, real-world study was conducted across 52 hospitals between June 9, 2018, and December 28, 2019. Patients who met the following inclusion criteria were included: (1) admitted to the ICU, (2) of any age group, and (3) having a clinical or laboratory diagnosis of a Gram-positive bacterial infection. Clinical efficacy was categorized as success (cured or improved), failed, or non-evaluable. Adverse events and serious adverse events were recorded during treatment. RESULTS: A total of 366 ICU patients who met the inclusion criteria were evaluated. Linezolid was used as second- and first-line treatment in 232 (63.4%) and 134 (36.6%) patients, respectively. The most common isolated strain was Staphylococcus aureus (methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus: n=37/119, 31.1%; methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus: n=15/119, 12.6%); this was followed by Enterococci (vancomycin-resistant Enterococci: n=8/119, 6.7%; vancomycin-susceptible Enterococci: n=11/119, 9.2%) and Streptococcus pneumoniae (multidrug-resistant: n=4/119, 3.4%; non-multidrug resistant: n=2/119, 1.7%). The main infection sites where pathogens were detected included the lung (n=216/366, 59.6%), skin and soft tissue (n=104/366, 28.4%), and blood (n=50/366, 13.7%). Clinical success was achieved in 301 (82.2%) patients; 34 (9.3%) were cured and 267 (73.0%) improved; treatment failure and non-evaluable outcomes were observed in 29 (7.9%) in 36 (9.8%) patients, respectively. Linezolid-related adverse events were reported in 8 (2.2%) patients. No treatment-related serious adverse events were reported. CONCLUSIONS: Based on real-world results, linezolid was found to be effective and safe in the treatment of Gram-positive bacterial infections in critically ill patients. Elsevier 2022-07-05 /pmc/articles/PMC9923966/ /pubmed/36789359 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jointm.2022.05.006 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. on behalf of Chinese Medical Association. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Original Article
Ma, Aijia
Dong, Meiling
Cheng, Jiangli
Liao, Xuelian
Dong, Wei
Liu, Chang
Hu, Chenggong
Yang, Jing
Kang, Yan
Clinical efficacy and safety of linezolid in intensive care unit patients
title Clinical efficacy and safety of linezolid in intensive care unit patients
title_full Clinical efficacy and safety of linezolid in intensive care unit patients
title_fullStr Clinical efficacy and safety of linezolid in intensive care unit patients
title_full_unstemmed Clinical efficacy and safety of linezolid in intensive care unit patients
title_short Clinical efficacy and safety of linezolid in intensive care unit patients
title_sort clinical efficacy and safety of linezolid in intensive care unit patients
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9923966/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36789359
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jointm.2022.05.006
work_keys_str_mv AT maaijia clinicalefficacyandsafetyoflinezolidinintensivecareunitpatients
AT dongmeiling clinicalefficacyandsafetyoflinezolidinintensivecareunitpatients
AT chengjiangli clinicalefficacyandsafetyoflinezolidinintensivecareunitpatients
AT liaoxuelian clinicalefficacyandsafetyoflinezolidinintensivecareunitpatients
AT dongwei clinicalefficacyandsafetyoflinezolidinintensivecareunitpatients
AT liuchang clinicalefficacyandsafetyoflinezolidinintensivecareunitpatients
AT huchenggong clinicalefficacyandsafetyoflinezolidinintensivecareunitpatients
AT yangjing clinicalefficacyandsafetyoflinezolidinintensivecareunitpatients
AT kangyan clinicalefficacyandsafetyoflinezolidinintensivecareunitpatients