Cargando…

Dosimetric evaluation of the feasibility of utilizing a reduced number of interstitial needles in combined intracavitary and interstitial brachytherapy for cervical cancer

PURPOSE: To evaluate the ability of the Venezia advanced multichannel tandem and ring applicator to consistently produce dosimetrically comparable plans utilizing a reduced number of needle channels, to reduce the risk of secondary complications when boosting cervical cancer treatments with high dos...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jahan, Dishary, Ahmad, Salahuddin, Thompson, Spencer, Schnell, Erich
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9924101/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36355039
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.13833
_version_ 1784887825079992320
author Jahan, Dishary
Ahmad, Salahuddin
Thompson, Spencer
Schnell, Erich
author_facet Jahan, Dishary
Ahmad, Salahuddin
Thompson, Spencer
Schnell, Erich
author_sort Jahan, Dishary
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To evaluate the ability of the Venezia advanced multichannel tandem and ring applicator to consistently produce dosimetrically comparable plans utilizing a reduced number of needle channels, to reduce the risk of secondary complications when boosting cervical cancer treatments with high dose rate (HDR) brachytherapy. METHODS: We evaluated 26 fractions from 13 patients who were treated with HDR brachytherapy using the Venezia (Elekta) applicator. The original plans included a full load of 12–16 needles, including both parallel and 30‐degree oblique needles. We replanned each original to nine new configurations, with a reduced number of two, three, four, or six needles. Comparisons included differences in percentage dose coverage to 90% of the high‐risk clinical target volume, and percentage dose to 2 cm(3) of the bladder, rectum, sigmoid, and bowel. We considered new plans “passing” if they remained within our standards (D90 > 100%; D2 cm(3) < 85% bladder, <65% rectum, sigmoid, bowel) or did not perform worse than original. RESULTS: Removing only the two most anterior or the two most posterior needles from both sides showed 80.8% and 61.5% overall passing rate. Removal of the most anterior and posterior four needles together showed 65.4% overall passing rate. Removing all oblique needles showed 19.2% overall passing rate. Removing only left‐sided or only right‐sided oblique needles showed 46.2% and 23.1% overall passing, respectively. Removing only right‐sided or only left‐sided parallel needles separately showed 19.2% and 34.6% overall passing, respectively. Removing all parallel needles showed 11.5% overall passing rate. CONCLUSIONS: As only two replans required a full needle load to maintain dosimetric quality and 40 (76.9%), 36 (34.6%), 18 (69.2%), and 10 (19.2%) replans passed with 2, 3, 4, and 6 needles removed respectively, this indicates the potential for using a lesser number of interstitial needles during combined intracavitary and interstitial HDR brachytherapy while maintaining dosimetric quality.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9924101
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-99241012023-02-14 Dosimetric evaluation of the feasibility of utilizing a reduced number of interstitial needles in combined intracavitary and interstitial brachytherapy for cervical cancer Jahan, Dishary Ahmad, Salahuddin Thompson, Spencer Schnell, Erich J Appl Clin Med Phys Radiation Oncology Physics PURPOSE: To evaluate the ability of the Venezia advanced multichannel tandem and ring applicator to consistently produce dosimetrically comparable plans utilizing a reduced number of needle channels, to reduce the risk of secondary complications when boosting cervical cancer treatments with high dose rate (HDR) brachytherapy. METHODS: We evaluated 26 fractions from 13 patients who were treated with HDR brachytherapy using the Venezia (Elekta) applicator. The original plans included a full load of 12–16 needles, including both parallel and 30‐degree oblique needles. We replanned each original to nine new configurations, with a reduced number of two, three, four, or six needles. Comparisons included differences in percentage dose coverage to 90% of the high‐risk clinical target volume, and percentage dose to 2 cm(3) of the bladder, rectum, sigmoid, and bowel. We considered new plans “passing” if they remained within our standards (D90 > 100%; D2 cm(3) < 85% bladder, <65% rectum, sigmoid, bowel) or did not perform worse than original. RESULTS: Removing only the two most anterior or the two most posterior needles from both sides showed 80.8% and 61.5% overall passing rate. Removal of the most anterior and posterior four needles together showed 65.4% overall passing rate. Removing all oblique needles showed 19.2% overall passing rate. Removing only left‐sided or only right‐sided oblique needles showed 46.2% and 23.1% overall passing, respectively. Removing only right‐sided or only left‐sided parallel needles separately showed 19.2% and 34.6% overall passing, respectively. Removing all parallel needles showed 11.5% overall passing rate. CONCLUSIONS: As only two replans required a full needle load to maintain dosimetric quality and 40 (76.9%), 36 (34.6%), 18 (69.2%), and 10 (19.2%) replans passed with 2, 3, 4, and 6 needles removed respectively, this indicates the potential for using a lesser number of interstitial needles during combined intracavitary and interstitial HDR brachytherapy while maintaining dosimetric quality. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-11-10 /pmc/articles/PMC9924101/ /pubmed/36355039 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.13833 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics published by Wiley Periodicals, LLC on behalf of The American Association of Physicists in Medicine. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Radiation Oncology Physics
Jahan, Dishary
Ahmad, Salahuddin
Thompson, Spencer
Schnell, Erich
Dosimetric evaluation of the feasibility of utilizing a reduced number of interstitial needles in combined intracavitary and interstitial brachytherapy for cervical cancer
title Dosimetric evaluation of the feasibility of utilizing a reduced number of interstitial needles in combined intracavitary and interstitial brachytherapy for cervical cancer
title_full Dosimetric evaluation of the feasibility of utilizing a reduced number of interstitial needles in combined intracavitary and interstitial brachytherapy for cervical cancer
title_fullStr Dosimetric evaluation of the feasibility of utilizing a reduced number of interstitial needles in combined intracavitary and interstitial brachytherapy for cervical cancer
title_full_unstemmed Dosimetric evaluation of the feasibility of utilizing a reduced number of interstitial needles in combined intracavitary and interstitial brachytherapy for cervical cancer
title_short Dosimetric evaluation of the feasibility of utilizing a reduced number of interstitial needles in combined intracavitary and interstitial brachytherapy for cervical cancer
title_sort dosimetric evaluation of the feasibility of utilizing a reduced number of interstitial needles in combined intracavitary and interstitial brachytherapy for cervical cancer
topic Radiation Oncology Physics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9924101/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36355039
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.13833
work_keys_str_mv AT jahandishary dosimetricevaluationofthefeasibilityofutilizingareducednumberofinterstitialneedlesincombinedintracavitaryandinterstitialbrachytherapyforcervicalcancer
AT ahmadsalahuddin dosimetricevaluationofthefeasibilityofutilizingareducednumberofinterstitialneedlesincombinedintracavitaryandinterstitialbrachytherapyforcervicalcancer
AT thompsonspencer dosimetricevaluationofthefeasibilityofutilizingareducednumberofinterstitialneedlesincombinedintracavitaryandinterstitialbrachytherapyforcervicalcancer
AT schnellerich dosimetricevaluationofthefeasibilityofutilizingareducednumberofinterstitialneedlesincombinedintracavitaryandinterstitialbrachytherapyforcervicalcancer