Cargando…
Dosimetric evaluation of the feasibility of utilizing a reduced number of interstitial needles in combined intracavitary and interstitial brachytherapy for cervical cancer
PURPOSE: To evaluate the ability of the Venezia advanced multichannel tandem and ring applicator to consistently produce dosimetrically comparable plans utilizing a reduced number of needle channels, to reduce the risk of secondary complications when boosting cervical cancer treatments with high dos...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9924101/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36355039 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.13833 |
_version_ | 1784887825079992320 |
---|---|
author | Jahan, Dishary Ahmad, Salahuddin Thompson, Spencer Schnell, Erich |
author_facet | Jahan, Dishary Ahmad, Salahuddin Thompson, Spencer Schnell, Erich |
author_sort | Jahan, Dishary |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: To evaluate the ability of the Venezia advanced multichannel tandem and ring applicator to consistently produce dosimetrically comparable plans utilizing a reduced number of needle channels, to reduce the risk of secondary complications when boosting cervical cancer treatments with high dose rate (HDR) brachytherapy. METHODS: We evaluated 26 fractions from 13 patients who were treated with HDR brachytherapy using the Venezia (Elekta) applicator. The original plans included a full load of 12–16 needles, including both parallel and 30‐degree oblique needles. We replanned each original to nine new configurations, with a reduced number of two, three, four, or six needles. Comparisons included differences in percentage dose coverage to 90% of the high‐risk clinical target volume, and percentage dose to 2 cm(3) of the bladder, rectum, sigmoid, and bowel. We considered new plans “passing” if they remained within our standards (D90 > 100%; D2 cm(3) < 85% bladder, <65% rectum, sigmoid, bowel) or did not perform worse than original. RESULTS: Removing only the two most anterior or the two most posterior needles from both sides showed 80.8% and 61.5% overall passing rate. Removal of the most anterior and posterior four needles together showed 65.4% overall passing rate. Removing all oblique needles showed 19.2% overall passing rate. Removing only left‐sided or only right‐sided oblique needles showed 46.2% and 23.1% overall passing, respectively. Removing only right‐sided or only left‐sided parallel needles separately showed 19.2% and 34.6% overall passing, respectively. Removing all parallel needles showed 11.5% overall passing rate. CONCLUSIONS: As only two replans required a full needle load to maintain dosimetric quality and 40 (76.9%), 36 (34.6%), 18 (69.2%), and 10 (19.2%) replans passed with 2, 3, 4, and 6 needles removed respectively, this indicates the potential for using a lesser number of interstitial needles during combined intracavitary and interstitial HDR brachytherapy while maintaining dosimetric quality. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9924101 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-99241012023-02-14 Dosimetric evaluation of the feasibility of utilizing a reduced number of interstitial needles in combined intracavitary and interstitial brachytherapy for cervical cancer Jahan, Dishary Ahmad, Salahuddin Thompson, Spencer Schnell, Erich J Appl Clin Med Phys Radiation Oncology Physics PURPOSE: To evaluate the ability of the Venezia advanced multichannel tandem and ring applicator to consistently produce dosimetrically comparable plans utilizing a reduced number of needle channels, to reduce the risk of secondary complications when boosting cervical cancer treatments with high dose rate (HDR) brachytherapy. METHODS: We evaluated 26 fractions from 13 patients who were treated with HDR brachytherapy using the Venezia (Elekta) applicator. The original plans included a full load of 12–16 needles, including both parallel and 30‐degree oblique needles. We replanned each original to nine new configurations, with a reduced number of two, three, four, or six needles. Comparisons included differences in percentage dose coverage to 90% of the high‐risk clinical target volume, and percentage dose to 2 cm(3) of the bladder, rectum, sigmoid, and bowel. We considered new plans “passing” if they remained within our standards (D90 > 100%; D2 cm(3) < 85% bladder, <65% rectum, sigmoid, bowel) or did not perform worse than original. RESULTS: Removing only the two most anterior or the two most posterior needles from both sides showed 80.8% and 61.5% overall passing rate. Removal of the most anterior and posterior four needles together showed 65.4% overall passing rate. Removing all oblique needles showed 19.2% overall passing rate. Removing only left‐sided or only right‐sided oblique needles showed 46.2% and 23.1% overall passing, respectively. Removing only right‐sided or only left‐sided parallel needles separately showed 19.2% and 34.6% overall passing, respectively. Removing all parallel needles showed 11.5% overall passing rate. CONCLUSIONS: As only two replans required a full needle load to maintain dosimetric quality and 40 (76.9%), 36 (34.6%), 18 (69.2%), and 10 (19.2%) replans passed with 2, 3, 4, and 6 needles removed respectively, this indicates the potential for using a lesser number of interstitial needles during combined intracavitary and interstitial HDR brachytherapy while maintaining dosimetric quality. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-11-10 /pmc/articles/PMC9924101/ /pubmed/36355039 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.13833 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics published by Wiley Periodicals, LLC on behalf of The American Association of Physicists in Medicine. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Radiation Oncology Physics Jahan, Dishary Ahmad, Salahuddin Thompson, Spencer Schnell, Erich Dosimetric evaluation of the feasibility of utilizing a reduced number of interstitial needles in combined intracavitary and interstitial brachytherapy for cervical cancer |
title | Dosimetric evaluation of the feasibility of utilizing a reduced number of interstitial needles in combined intracavitary and interstitial brachytherapy for cervical cancer |
title_full | Dosimetric evaluation of the feasibility of utilizing a reduced number of interstitial needles in combined intracavitary and interstitial brachytherapy for cervical cancer |
title_fullStr | Dosimetric evaluation of the feasibility of utilizing a reduced number of interstitial needles in combined intracavitary and interstitial brachytherapy for cervical cancer |
title_full_unstemmed | Dosimetric evaluation of the feasibility of utilizing a reduced number of interstitial needles in combined intracavitary and interstitial brachytherapy for cervical cancer |
title_short | Dosimetric evaluation of the feasibility of utilizing a reduced number of interstitial needles in combined intracavitary and interstitial brachytherapy for cervical cancer |
title_sort | dosimetric evaluation of the feasibility of utilizing a reduced number of interstitial needles in combined intracavitary and interstitial brachytherapy for cervical cancer |
topic | Radiation Oncology Physics |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9924101/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36355039 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.13833 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT jahandishary dosimetricevaluationofthefeasibilityofutilizingareducednumberofinterstitialneedlesincombinedintracavitaryandinterstitialbrachytherapyforcervicalcancer AT ahmadsalahuddin dosimetricevaluationofthefeasibilityofutilizingareducednumberofinterstitialneedlesincombinedintracavitaryandinterstitialbrachytherapyforcervicalcancer AT thompsonspencer dosimetricevaluationofthefeasibilityofutilizingareducednumberofinterstitialneedlesincombinedintracavitaryandinterstitialbrachytherapyforcervicalcancer AT schnellerich dosimetricevaluationofthefeasibilityofutilizingareducednumberofinterstitialneedlesincombinedintracavitaryandinterstitialbrachytherapyforcervicalcancer |