Cargando…
A simplified and effective off‐axis Winston–Lutz for single‐isocenter multi‐target SRS
PURPOSE: To safely perform single‐iso multi‐target (SIMT) stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS), clinics must demonstrate SRS delivery accuracy for off‐axis targets. The traditional Winston–Lutz (W–L) was widely adopted because it provides a simple and accurate solution for testing radiation‐isocenter coi...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9924106/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36420972 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.13816 |
_version_ | 1784887826299486208 |
---|---|
author | Eagle, Anton Tallhamer, Mike Keener, Justin Geneser, Sarah |
author_facet | Eagle, Anton Tallhamer, Mike Keener, Justin Geneser, Sarah |
author_sort | Eagle, Anton |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: To safely perform single‐iso multi‐target (SIMT) stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS), clinics must demonstrate SRS delivery accuracy for off‐axis targets. The traditional Winston–Lutz (W–L) was widely adopted because it provides a simple and accurate solution for testing radiation‐isocenter coincidence that uses a static target, enables testing arbitrary treatment angles, and does not require expensive commercial phantoms. The current noncommercial tests are cumbersome and insufficiently accurate. For an off‐axis Winston–Lutz (OAWL) test, one must design MLC fields centered on off‐axis targets. Unfortunately, because MLC leaf‐interfaces are often misaligned with the target center, accomplishing this presents a nontrivial geometry problem that has not been previously solved in the literature. We present a solution for evaluating SIMT SRS accuracy that provides a straightforward method for creating OAWL test fields and offers all the benefits of the standard W–L test. METHODS: We have developed a method to use any gantry, table, and initial collimator angles to create OAWL fields. This method calculates a series of nested coordinate transformations that produce a small collimator angle adjustment to align the MLC and create a symmetric field around an off‐axis target. RESULTS: For an 8 cm off‐axis target, the described method yields OAWL results within 0.07 mm of standard isocentric W–L results. Our six most recent isocentric W–L tests show max and mean errors of 0.59 and 0.37 mm, respectively. For six runs of our proposed OAWL test, the average max and mean errors are 0.66 and 0.40 mm, respectively. CONCLUSION: This method accurately evaluates SRS delivery accuracy for off‐axis distances that span the majority of a typical human brain for a centered SIMT arc. We have made this method publicly available, so that physicists can employ it within their clinics, foregoing the need for expensive phantoms and improving access to the state‐of‐the‐art SIMT SRS technique. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9924106 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-99241062023-02-14 A simplified and effective off‐axis Winston–Lutz for single‐isocenter multi‐target SRS Eagle, Anton Tallhamer, Mike Keener, Justin Geneser, Sarah J Appl Clin Med Phys Radiation Oncology Physics PURPOSE: To safely perform single‐iso multi‐target (SIMT) stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS), clinics must demonstrate SRS delivery accuracy for off‐axis targets. The traditional Winston–Lutz (W–L) was widely adopted because it provides a simple and accurate solution for testing radiation‐isocenter coincidence that uses a static target, enables testing arbitrary treatment angles, and does not require expensive commercial phantoms. The current noncommercial tests are cumbersome and insufficiently accurate. For an off‐axis Winston–Lutz (OAWL) test, one must design MLC fields centered on off‐axis targets. Unfortunately, because MLC leaf‐interfaces are often misaligned with the target center, accomplishing this presents a nontrivial geometry problem that has not been previously solved in the literature. We present a solution for evaluating SIMT SRS accuracy that provides a straightforward method for creating OAWL test fields and offers all the benefits of the standard W–L test. METHODS: We have developed a method to use any gantry, table, and initial collimator angles to create OAWL fields. This method calculates a series of nested coordinate transformations that produce a small collimator angle adjustment to align the MLC and create a symmetric field around an off‐axis target. RESULTS: For an 8 cm off‐axis target, the described method yields OAWL results within 0.07 mm of standard isocentric W–L results. Our six most recent isocentric W–L tests show max and mean errors of 0.59 and 0.37 mm, respectively. For six runs of our proposed OAWL test, the average max and mean errors are 0.66 and 0.40 mm, respectively. CONCLUSION: This method accurately evaluates SRS delivery accuracy for off‐axis distances that span the majority of a typical human brain for a centered SIMT arc. We have made this method publicly available, so that physicists can employ it within their clinics, foregoing the need for expensive phantoms and improving access to the state‐of‐the‐art SIMT SRS technique. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-11-24 /pmc/articles/PMC9924106/ /pubmed/36420972 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.13816 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics published by Wiley Periodicals, LLC on behalf of The American Association of Physicists in Medicine. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Radiation Oncology Physics Eagle, Anton Tallhamer, Mike Keener, Justin Geneser, Sarah A simplified and effective off‐axis Winston–Lutz for single‐isocenter multi‐target SRS |
title | A simplified and effective off‐axis Winston–Lutz for single‐isocenter multi‐target SRS |
title_full | A simplified and effective off‐axis Winston–Lutz for single‐isocenter multi‐target SRS |
title_fullStr | A simplified and effective off‐axis Winston–Lutz for single‐isocenter multi‐target SRS |
title_full_unstemmed | A simplified and effective off‐axis Winston–Lutz for single‐isocenter multi‐target SRS |
title_short | A simplified and effective off‐axis Winston–Lutz for single‐isocenter multi‐target SRS |
title_sort | simplified and effective off‐axis winston–lutz for single‐isocenter multi‐target srs |
topic | Radiation Oncology Physics |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9924106/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36420972 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.13816 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT eagleanton asimplifiedandeffectiveoffaxiswinstonlutzforsingleisocentermultitargetsrs AT tallhamermike asimplifiedandeffectiveoffaxiswinstonlutzforsingleisocentermultitargetsrs AT keenerjustin asimplifiedandeffectiveoffaxiswinstonlutzforsingleisocentermultitargetsrs AT genesersarah asimplifiedandeffectiveoffaxiswinstonlutzforsingleisocentermultitargetsrs AT eagleanton simplifiedandeffectiveoffaxiswinstonlutzforsingleisocentermultitargetsrs AT tallhamermike simplifiedandeffectiveoffaxiswinstonlutzforsingleisocentermultitargetsrs AT keenerjustin simplifiedandeffectiveoffaxiswinstonlutzforsingleisocentermultitargetsrs AT genesersarah simplifiedandeffectiveoffaxiswinstonlutzforsingleisocentermultitargetsrs |