Cargando…

Reduction of radiation dose using real‐time visual feedback dosimetry during angiographic interventions

This prospective study sought to evaluate potential savings of radiation dose to medical staff using real‐time dosimetry coupled with visual radiation dose feedback during angiographic interventions. For this purpose, we analyzed a total of 214 angiographic examinations that consisted of chemoemboli...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Koch, Vitali, Conrades, Lena Marie, Gruenewald, Leon D., Eichler, Katrin, Martin, Simon S., Booz, Christian, D'Angelo, Tommaso, Yel, Ibrahim, Bernatz, Simon, Mahmoudi, Scherwin, Albrecht, Moritz H., Scholtz, Jan‐Erik, Thalhammer, Axel, Zangos, Stephan, Vogl, Thomas J., Gruber‐Rouh, Tatjana
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9924107/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36565180
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.13860
_version_ 1784887826531221504
author Koch, Vitali
Conrades, Lena Marie
Gruenewald, Leon D.
Eichler, Katrin
Martin, Simon S.
Booz, Christian
D'Angelo, Tommaso
Yel, Ibrahim
Bernatz, Simon
Mahmoudi, Scherwin
Albrecht, Moritz H.
Scholtz, Jan‐Erik
Thalhammer, Axel
Zangos, Stephan
Vogl, Thomas J.
Gruber‐Rouh, Tatjana
author_facet Koch, Vitali
Conrades, Lena Marie
Gruenewald, Leon D.
Eichler, Katrin
Martin, Simon S.
Booz, Christian
D'Angelo, Tommaso
Yel, Ibrahim
Bernatz, Simon
Mahmoudi, Scherwin
Albrecht, Moritz H.
Scholtz, Jan‐Erik
Thalhammer, Axel
Zangos, Stephan
Vogl, Thomas J.
Gruber‐Rouh, Tatjana
author_sort Koch, Vitali
collection PubMed
description This prospective study sought to evaluate potential savings of radiation dose to medical staff using real‐time dosimetry coupled with visual radiation dose feedback during angiographic interventions. For this purpose, we analyzed a total of 214 angiographic examinations that consisted of chemoembolizations and several other types of therapeutic interventions. The Unfors RaySafe i2 dosimeter was worn by the interventionalist at chest height over the lead protection. A total of 110 interventions were performed with real‐time radiation dosimetry allowing the interventionalist to react upon higher x‐ray exposure and 104 examinations served as the comparative group without real‐time radiation monitoring. By using the real‐time display during interventions, the overall mean operator radiation dose decreased from 3.67 (IQR, 0.95–23.01) to 2.36 μSv (IQR, 0.52–12.66) (−36%; p = 0.032) at simultaneously reduced operator exposure time by 4.5 min (p = 0.071). Dividing interventions into chemoembolizations and other types of therapeutic interventions, radiation dose decreased from 1.31 (IQR, 0.46‐3.62) to 0.95 μSv (IQR, 0.53‐3.11) and from 24.39 (IQR, 12.14‐63.0) to 10.37 μSv (IQR, 0.85‐36.84), respectively, using live‐screen dosimetry (p ≤ 0.005). Radiation dose reductions were also observed for the participating assistants, indicating that they could also benefit from real‐time visual feedback dosimetry during interventions (−30%; p = 0.039). Integration of real‐time dosimetry into clinical processes might be useful in reducing occupational radiation exposure time during angiographic interventions. The real‐time visual feedback raised the awareness of interventionalists and their assistants to the potential danger of prolonged radiation exposure leading to the adoption of radiation‐sparing practices. Therefore, it might create a safer environment for the medical staff by keeping the applied radiation exposure as low as possible.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9924107
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-99241072023-02-14 Reduction of radiation dose using real‐time visual feedback dosimetry during angiographic interventions Koch, Vitali Conrades, Lena Marie Gruenewald, Leon D. Eichler, Katrin Martin, Simon S. Booz, Christian D'Angelo, Tommaso Yel, Ibrahim Bernatz, Simon Mahmoudi, Scherwin Albrecht, Moritz H. Scholtz, Jan‐Erik Thalhammer, Axel Zangos, Stephan Vogl, Thomas J. Gruber‐Rouh, Tatjana J Appl Clin Med Phys Radiation Protection & Regulations This prospective study sought to evaluate potential savings of radiation dose to medical staff using real‐time dosimetry coupled with visual radiation dose feedback during angiographic interventions. For this purpose, we analyzed a total of 214 angiographic examinations that consisted of chemoembolizations and several other types of therapeutic interventions. The Unfors RaySafe i2 dosimeter was worn by the interventionalist at chest height over the lead protection. A total of 110 interventions were performed with real‐time radiation dosimetry allowing the interventionalist to react upon higher x‐ray exposure and 104 examinations served as the comparative group without real‐time radiation monitoring. By using the real‐time display during interventions, the overall mean operator radiation dose decreased from 3.67 (IQR, 0.95–23.01) to 2.36 μSv (IQR, 0.52–12.66) (−36%; p = 0.032) at simultaneously reduced operator exposure time by 4.5 min (p = 0.071). Dividing interventions into chemoembolizations and other types of therapeutic interventions, radiation dose decreased from 1.31 (IQR, 0.46‐3.62) to 0.95 μSv (IQR, 0.53‐3.11) and from 24.39 (IQR, 12.14‐63.0) to 10.37 μSv (IQR, 0.85‐36.84), respectively, using live‐screen dosimetry (p ≤ 0.005). Radiation dose reductions were also observed for the participating assistants, indicating that they could also benefit from real‐time visual feedback dosimetry during interventions (−30%; p = 0.039). Integration of real‐time dosimetry into clinical processes might be useful in reducing occupational radiation exposure time during angiographic interventions. The real‐time visual feedback raised the awareness of interventionalists and their assistants to the potential danger of prolonged radiation exposure leading to the adoption of radiation‐sparing practices. Therefore, it might create a safer environment for the medical staff by keeping the applied radiation exposure as low as possible. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-12-24 /pmc/articles/PMC9924107/ /pubmed/36565180 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.13860 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics published by Wiley Periodicals, LLC on behalf of The American Association of Physicists in Medicine. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Radiation Protection & Regulations
Koch, Vitali
Conrades, Lena Marie
Gruenewald, Leon D.
Eichler, Katrin
Martin, Simon S.
Booz, Christian
D'Angelo, Tommaso
Yel, Ibrahim
Bernatz, Simon
Mahmoudi, Scherwin
Albrecht, Moritz H.
Scholtz, Jan‐Erik
Thalhammer, Axel
Zangos, Stephan
Vogl, Thomas J.
Gruber‐Rouh, Tatjana
Reduction of radiation dose using real‐time visual feedback dosimetry during angiographic interventions
title Reduction of radiation dose using real‐time visual feedback dosimetry during angiographic interventions
title_full Reduction of radiation dose using real‐time visual feedback dosimetry during angiographic interventions
title_fullStr Reduction of radiation dose using real‐time visual feedback dosimetry during angiographic interventions
title_full_unstemmed Reduction of radiation dose using real‐time visual feedback dosimetry during angiographic interventions
title_short Reduction of radiation dose using real‐time visual feedback dosimetry during angiographic interventions
title_sort reduction of radiation dose using real‐time visual feedback dosimetry during angiographic interventions
topic Radiation Protection & Regulations
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9924107/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36565180
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.13860
work_keys_str_mv AT kochvitali reductionofradiationdoseusingrealtimevisualfeedbackdosimetryduringangiographicinterventions
AT conradeslenamarie reductionofradiationdoseusingrealtimevisualfeedbackdosimetryduringangiographicinterventions
AT gruenewaldleond reductionofradiationdoseusingrealtimevisualfeedbackdosimetryduringangiographicinterventions
AT eichlerkatrin reductionofradiationdoseusingrealtimevisualfeedbackdosimetryduringangiographicinterventions
AT martinsimons reductionofradiationdoseusingrealtimevisualfeedbackdosimetryduringangiographicinterventions
AT boozchristian reductionofradiationdoseusingrealtimevisualfeedbackdosimetryduringangiographicinterventions
AT dangelotommaso reductionofradiationdoseusingrealtimevisualfeedbackdosimetryduringangiographicinterventions
AT yelibrahim reductionofradiationdoseusingrealtimevisualfeedbackdosimetryduringangiographicinterventions
AT bernatzsimon reductionofradiationdoseusingrealtimevisualfeedbackdosimetryduringangiographicinterventions
AT mahmoudischerwin reductionofradiationdoseusingrealtimevisualfeedbackdosimetryduringangiographicinterventions
AT albrechtmoritzh reductionofradiationdoseusingrealtimevisualfeedbackdosimetryduringangiographicinterventions
AT scholtzjanerik reductionofradiationdoseusingrealtimevisualfeedbackdosimetryduringangiographicinterventions
AT thalhammeraxel reductionofradiationdoseusingrealtimevisualfeedbackdosimetryduringangiographicinterventions
AT zangosstephan reductionofradiationdoseusingrealtimevisualfeedbackdosimetryduringangiographicinterventions
AT voglthomasj reductionofradiationdoseusingrealtimevisualfeedbackdosimetryduringangiographicinterventions
AT gruberrouhtatjana reductionofradiationdoseusingrealtimevisualfeedbackdosimetryduringangiographicinterventions